Literature DB >> 28307853

The effect of behavioural and morphological plasticity on foraging efficiency in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus sp.).

Troy Day1, J D McPhail2.   

Abstract

We conducted an experiment to assess the change in foraging efficiency resulting from diet-induced morphological and behavioural plasticity in a species of freshwater, threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus sp.). Different degrees of morphological and behavioural change were induced using two prey items commonly found in the diet of this species, allowing us to estimate the relative importance of each type of plasticity. The purpose of the experiment was twofold. First, earlier work had suggested that diet variability might be an important factor in the evolution of trophic morphological plasticity in sticklebacks. The present results extend this work by revealing the adaptive significance of morphological plasticity. The current experiment also qualitatively assessed the compatibility of the time scale of morphological change with that of the natural resource variability experienced by this species. The results indicate that diet-induced plasticity improves foraging efficiency continuously for up to 72 days of prey exposure. This is probably due in part to plasticity of the external trophic morphology but our results also suggest a complex interplay between morphology and behaviour. The time scale appears to be matched to that of natural diet variability although it is possible that some traits exhibit non-labile plasticity. Our discussion highlights the important distinction between conditions favouring the evolution of labile versus non-labile plasticity. The second objective of the experiment was to determine the relative importance of morphological and behavioural plasticity. Few studies have attempted to quantify the adaptive significance of morphological plasticity and no study to our knowledge has separated the effects of morphological and behavioural plasticity. Our experiment reveals that both behavioural and morphological plasticity are important and it also suggests a dichotomy between the two: behavioural plasticity predominately affects searching efficiency whereas morphological plasticity predominately affects handling efficiency.

Keywords:  Adaptive significance of plasticity; Behavioural versus morphological plasticity; Foraging efficiency; Phenotypic plasticity; Sticklebacks

Year:  1996        PMID: 28307853     DOI: 10.1007/BF00334665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

Review 1.  The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses.

Authors:  C D Harvell
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Character displacement and replicate adaptive radiation.

Authors:  D Schluter; J D McPhail
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Consumption rates and the evolution of diet-induced plasticity in the head morphology of Melanoplus femurrubrum (Orthoptera: Acrididae).

Authors:  Daniel B Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A COMPARISON OF TWO STICKLEBACKS.

Authors:  Troy Day; John Pritchard; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY.

Authors:  Sara Via; Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling.

Authors:  L E Lanyon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  PLASTICITY OF JAW AND SKULL MORPHOLOGY IN THE NEOTROPICAL CICHLIDS GEOPHAGUS BRASILIENSIS AND G. STEINDACHNERI.

Authors:  Peter H Wimberger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Development of hippocampal specialisation in two species of tit (Parus spp.).

Authors:  S D Healy; N S Clayton; J R Krebs
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Ancestral Plasticity and Allometry in Threespine Stickleback Fish Reveal Phenotypes Associated with Derived, Freshwater Ecotypes.

Authors:  Matthew A Wund; Sophie Valena; Susan Wood; John A Baker
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.138

3.  Effects of resource level and habitat type on behavioral and morphological plasticity in Eurasian perch.

Authors:  Jens Olsson; Richard Svanbäck; Peter Eklöv
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Functional basis of ecological divergence in sympatric stickleback.

Authors:  Matthew D McGee; Dolph Schluter; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Ecosystem size predicts eco-morphological variability in a postglacial diversification.

Authors:  Hans Recknagel; Oliver E Hooker; Colin E Adams; Kathryn R Elmer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Does phenotypic plasticity initiate developmental bias?

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Kirsty McWhinnie; Natalie Pilakouta; Lynsey Walker
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Evolutionary responses to invasion: cane toad sympatric fish show enhanced avoidance learning.

Authors:  Georgina Caller; Culum Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Morphological plasticity in a native freshwater fish from semiarid Australia in response to variable water flows.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Peter M Davies; Shaun P Collin; Pauline F Grierson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.