Literature DB >> 28307755

Range-body mass interactions of a northern ungulate - a test of hypothesis.

Olav Hjeljord1, Trond Histøl1.   

Abstract

Summer diet, summer temperature, length of the growth season and animal density appeared to best explain annual and regional differences in calf and yearling body mass in moose from southeastern Norway. In general animals inhabiting steep, alpine landscapes had less body mass than animals using flat, low-altitude habitats. Autumn body mass of calves and yearlings decreased with increasing snow depth during the preceding winter and spring. However, calf body mass was more influenced by the summer range and less by the winter range than was body mass of yearlings. There was no indication that the effect of snow depth on autumn body mass was greater in moose living on poor than on good summer ranges. Body mass decreased with increasing competition for summer forage, while the winter range mainly had an density-independent effect. Habitat quality, expressed as regression lines between calf and yearling body mass and animal density (hunting yield), differed between regions. On ranges of medium and high altitude where birch (Betula spp.) rowan (Sorbus aucuparia) and bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) dominated moose summer diet, body mass decreased at a rapid rate with increasing animal density. Body mass decreased at a slower rate at low-altitude ranges and at high-altitude ranges where willow (Salix spp.) and forbs dominated the diet. Body mass of lactating cows decreased with increasing animal density, but animal density did not affect body mass of non-lactating cows. There was no indication that the decrease in autumn body mass with increasing moose density over the last 25 years has caused a decrease in animal condition (ability to survive the winter). The results are discussed in relation to the effect of summer and winter range on population regulation in moose. It is concluded that a density-dependent effect is apparent on the summer range even at low and intermediate population densities. On the winter range, on the other hand, density-dependence is likely to occur only at high levels of population density.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alces alces; Habitat quality; Key words Body mass; Population density

Year:  1999        PMID: 28307755     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Climatic effects on life-history traits of moose in Estonia.

Authors:  Rauno Veeroja; Vallo Tilgar; Anne Kirk; Jüri Tõnisson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Geographical variation in the influence of density dependence and climate on the recruitment of Norwegian moose.

Authors:  Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether; Magnar Lillegård; Erling J Solberg; Steinar Engen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Marginal sinks or potential refuges? Costs and benefits for coral-obligate reef fishes at deep range margins.

Authors:  Chancey MacDonald; Geoffrey P Jones; Tom Bridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Global climate change and reindeer: effects of winter weather on the autumn weight and growth of calves.

Authors:  Robert B Weladji; Øystein Holand
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Sexual dimorphism and intercohort variation in reindeer calf antler length is associated with density and weather.

Authors:  Robert B Weladji; Oystein Holand; Geir Steinheim; Jonathan E Colman; Hallvard Gjøstein; Ansgar Kosmo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Moose body mass variation revisited: disentangling effects of environmental conditions and genetics.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Hallvard Haanes; Erling J Solberg; Knut H Røed; Kjell Arild Høgda; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Saether; Kjell Arild Høgda; Reidar Andersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Complex variation in habitat selection strategies among individuals driven by extrinsic factors.

Authors:  Edward J Raynor; Hawthorne L Beyer; John M Briggs; Anthony Joern
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Moose selecting for specific nutritional composition of birch places limits on food acceptability.

Authors:  Hilde K Wam; Annika M Felton; Caroline Stolter; Line Nybakken; Olav Hjeljord
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Biomarkers of Animal Nutrition: From Seasonal to Lifetime Indicators of Environmental Conditions.

Authors:  Rachel A Smiley; Tayler N LaSharr; Heather N Abernathy; Yasaman N Shakeri; Rebecca L Levine; Seth T Rankins; Rhiannon P Jakopak; Rebekah T Rafferty; Jaron T Kolek; Brittany L Wagler; Samantha P H Dwinnell; Timothy J Robinson; Jill E Randall; Rusty C Kaiser; Mark Thonhoff; Brandon Scurlock; Troy Fieseler; Gary L Fralick; Kevin L Monteith
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.