Literature DB >> 28307437

Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales.

T F Ginnett1, Montague W Demment1.   

Abstract

We test predictions about differences in the foraging behaviors of male and female giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi Matchie) that derive from a hypothesis linking sexual size dimorphism to foraging behavior. This body-size hypothesis predicts that males will exhibit specific behaviors that increase their dry-matter intake rate relative to females. Foraging behavior was examined at two hierarchical levels corresponding to two spatial and temporal scales, within patches and within habitats. Patches are defined as individual trees or shrubs and habitats are defined as collections of patches within plant communities. Males were predicted to increase dry-matter intake rate within patches by taking larger bites, cropping bites more quickly, chewing less, and chewing faster. Within habitats, males were expected to increase intake rate by increasing the proportion of foraging time devoted to food ingestion as opposed to inter-patch travel time and vigilance. The predictions were tested in a free-ranging population of giraffes in Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Males spent less total time foraging than females but allocated a greater proportion of their foraging time to forage ingestion as opposed to travel between patches. There was no sex difference in rumination time but males spent more time in activities other than foraging and rumination, such as walking. Within patches, males took larger bites than females, but females cropped bites more quickly and chewed faster. Males had longer per-bite handling times than females but had shorter handling times per gram of intake. Within habitats, males had longer average patch residence times but there was no significant sex difference in inter-patch travel times. There was no overall difference between sexes in vigilance while foraging, although there were significant sex by habitat and sex by season interactions. Although not all the predictions were confirmed, overall the results agree qualitatively with the body-size hypothesis. Sex-related differences in foraging behavior led to greater estimated intake rates for males at the within-patch and within-habitat scales.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Key words Giraffe ; Ruminant ;  Foraging behavior ;  Herbivore ;  Sexual dimorphism

Year:  1997        PMID: 28307437     DOI: 10.1007/s004420050162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism, activity budget and synchrony in groups of sheep.

Authors:  Pablo Michelena; Sarah Noël; Jacques Gautrais; Jean-François Gerard; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Richard Bon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nutritional quality of gorilla diets: consequences of age, sex, and season.

Authors:  Jessica M Rothman; Ellen S Dierenfeld; Harold F Hintz; Alice N Pell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Foraging decisions in a capital breeder: trade-offs between mass gain and lactation.

Authors:  Sandra Hamel; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Sex-related differences in the trade-off between foraging and vigilance in a granivorous forager.

Authors:  Thibaut Powolny; Vincent Bretagnolle; Astrid Aguilar; Cyril Eraud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  First Insights into the Urinary Metabolome of Captive Giraffes by Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Chenglin Zhu; Sabrina Fasoli; Gloria Isani; Luca Laghi
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Sex Differences in Risk Preference and c-Fos Expression in Paraventricular Thalamic Nucleus of Rats During Gambling Task.

Authors:  Hironori Ishii; Mariko Onodera; Shinya Ohara; Ken-Ichiro Tsutsui; Toshio Iijima
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species.

Authors:  Ashley Bennison; Joan Giménez; John L Quinn; Jonathan A Green; Mark Jessopp
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.