Literature DB >> 16456687

Sexual dimorphism, activity budget and synchrony in groups of sheep.

Pablo Michelena1, Sarah Noël, Jacques Gautrais, Jean-François Gerard, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Richard Bon.   

Abstract

The activity budget hypothesis has been proposed to explain the social segregation commonly observed in ungulate populations. This hypothesis suggests that differences in body size--i.e. between dimorphic males and females--may account for differences in activity budget. In particular, if females spend more time grazing and less time resting than males, activity synchrony would be reduced. Increased costs of maintaining synchrony despite differences in activity budget would facilitate group fragmentation and instability of mixed-sex groups. In this paper two prerequisites of the activity budget hypothesis were tested: (1) that males should spend less time feeding and more time resting than females in single-sex groups and (2) that lower activity synchrony should be observed in mixed-sex compared to single-sex groups. The activity budget and synchrony in mixed and single-sex groups of merino sheep (Ovis aries) of different sizes (2, 4, 6, 8 individuals) were measured in three contiguous 491-m2 arenas located in a natural pasture. Three same-size groups, one of each category, were observed simultaneously. We found no sexual differences in the time spent inactive and active (i.e. grazing, standing, moving, interacting). Males spent significantly more time grazing and less time standing than females. These differences disappeared when yearling males were omitted from the group. Males and females had similar bite and step rates. Sheep of both sexes spent less time resting and more time grazing and moving and had lower bite rates when in mixed-sex groups than when in single-sex groups. The synchrony among visually isolated groups was near zero, indicating that they changed activities independently. On the contrary, within-group synchrony was high; however it was higher in single-sex groups, in particular for males, than in mixed-sex groups. Our results suggest that differences in activity budget and synchrony alone are insufficient to explain social segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16456687     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0347-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.

Authors:  K E Ruckstuhl; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-02

2.  Group decision-making in animals.

Authors:  L Conradt; T J Roper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.

Authors:  Christophe Bonenfant; Leif E Loe; Atle Mysterud; Rolf Langvatn; Nils Chr Stenseth; Jean-Michel Gaillard; François Klein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The influence of sexual dimorphism in body size and mouth morphology on diet selection and sexual segregation in cervids.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; I J Gordon
Journal:  Acta Vet Hung       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  The relative roles of body size and feeding type on activity time of temperate ruminants.

Authors:  Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores.

Authors:  A Mysterud
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The relative roles of phylogeny, body size and feeding style on the activity time of temperate ruminants: a reanalysis.

Authors:  F Javier Pérez-Barbería; Iain J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Social segregation is not a consequence of habitat segregation in red deer and feral soay sheep.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Body size dimorphism and sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates: an experimental test with Soay sheep.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; I J Gordon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants?

Authors:  L Conradt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  8 in total

1.  Group size elicits specific physiological response in herbivores.

Authors:  Pablo Michelena; Marie-Hélène Pillot; Carole Henrion; Sylvain Toulet; Alain Boissy; Richard Bon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The role of foraging behaviour in the sexual segregation of the African elephant.

Authors:  Graeme Shannon; Bruce R Page; Kevin J Duffy; Rob Slotow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does the Jarman-Bell principle at intra-specific level explain sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates? Sex differences in forage digestibility in Soay sheep.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; E Pérez-Fernández; E Robertson; B Alvarez-Enríquez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  How group size affects vigilance dynamics and time allocation patterns: the key role of imitation and tempo.

Authors:  Pablo Michelena; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Out of Sight but Not Out of Mind? Behavioral Coordination in Red-Tailed Sportive Lemurs (Lepilemur ruficaudatus).

Authors:  Claudia Fichtel; Walter Zucchini; Roland Hilgartner
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Differences in social preference between the sexes during ontogeny drive segregation in a precocial species.

Authors:  Mark A Whiteside; Jayden O van Horik; Ellis J G Langley; Christine E Beardsworth; Philippa R Laker; Joah R Madden
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Light pollution affects space use and interaction of two small mammal species irrespective of personality.

Authors:  Julia Hoffmann; Annika Schirmer; Jana Anja Eccard
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  The effect of male age on patterns of sexual segregation in Siberian ibex.

Authors:  Muyang Wang; Joana Alves; António Alves da Silva; Weikang Yang; Kathreen E Ruckstuhl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.