Literature DB >> 2830635

Evolution of neurotransmitter receptor systems.

J C Venter1, U di Porzio, D A Robinson, S M Shreeve, J Lai, A R Kerlavage, S P Fracek, K U Lentes, C M Fraser.   

Abstract

The presence of hormones, neurotransmitters, their receptors and biosynthetic and degradative enzymes is clearly not only associated with the present and the recent past but with the past several hundred million years. Evidence is mounting which indicates substantial conservation of protein structure and function of these receptors and enzymes over these tremendous periods of time. These findings indicate that the evolution and development of the nervous system was not dependent upon the formation of new or better transmitter substances, receptor proteins, transducers and effector proteins but involved better utilization of these highly developed elements in creating advanced and refined circuitry. This is not a new concept; it is one that is now substantiated by increasingly sophisticated studies. In a 1953 article discussing chemical aspects of evolution (Danielli, 1953) Danielli quotes Medawar, "... endocrine evolution is not an evolution of hormones but an evolution of the uses to which they are put; an evolution not, to put it crudely, of chemical formulae but of reactivities, reaction patterns and tissue competences." To also quote Danielli, "In terms of comparative biochemistry, one must ask to what extent the evolution of these reactivities, reaction patterns and competences is conditional upon the evolution of methods of synthesis of new proteins, etc., and to what extent the proteins, etc., are always within the synthetic competence of an organism. In the latter case evolution is the history of changing uses of molecules, and not of changing synthetic abilities." (Danielli, 1953). Figure 4 outlines a phylogenetic tree together with an indication of where evidence exists for both the enzymes that determine the biosynthesis and metabolism of the cholinergic and adrenergic transmitters and their specific cholinergic and adrenergic receptors. This figure illustrates a number of important points. For example, the evidence appears to show that the transmitters and their associated enzymes existed for a substantial period before their respective receptor proteins. While the transmitters and enzymes appear to exist in single cellular organisms, there is no solid evidence for the presence of adrenergic or cholinergic receptors until multicellular organisms where the receptors appear to be clearly associated with specific cellular and neuronal communication (Fig. 4). One can only speculate as to the possible role for acetylcholine and the catecholamine in single cell organisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2830635     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(88)90004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  14 in total

Review 1.  Immunohistochemistry of cholinergic receptors.

Authors:  H Schröder
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1992-10

Review 2.  In vitro mutagenesis and the search for structure-function relationships among G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  T M Savarese; C M Fraser
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Evo-devo and brain scaling: candidate developmental mechanisms for variation and constancy in vertebrate brain evolution.

Authors:  Christine J Charvet; Georg F Striedter; Barbara L Finlay
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Primary structure of rat cardiac beta-adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors obtained by automated DNA sequence analysis: further evidence for a multigene family.

Authors:  J Gocayne; D A Robinson; M G FitzGerald; F Z Chung; A R Kerlavage; K U Lentes; J Lai; C D Wang; C M Fraser; J C Venter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Total synthesis and expression of a gene for the alpha-subunit of bovine rod outer segment guanine nucleotide-binding protein (transducin).

Authors:  T P Sakmar; H G Khorana
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Temporal and spatial expression patterns of two G-protein coupled receptors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F Hannan; L M Hall
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  1996-06

Review 7.  Trace amine-associated receptor 1-Family archetype or iconoclast?

Authors:  David K Grandy
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 8.  Drosophila melanogaster G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  T Brody; A Cravchik
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  The Drosophila surface glia transcriptome: evolutionary conserved blood-brain barrier processes.

Authors:  Michael K DeSalvo; Samantha J Hindle; Zeid M Rusan; Souvinh Orng; Mark Eddison; Kyle Halliwill; Roland J Bainton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Astrocyte-Neuron Interactions during Learning May Occur by Lactate Signaling Rather than Metabolism.

Authors:  Mauro DiNuzzo
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.