Literature DB >> 28305266

Analysis of early stages of budding inHydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor.

Stefan Berking1, Alfred Gierer1.   

Abstract

Buds originate inHydra attenuata at a position 1/3 of the body length from the basal disc. The position with respect to the vertical axes is determined first and the position of the bud on the circumference of this budding region is specified later.Bud formation in hydra is reversibly prevented by pre-treatment with an inhibitor purified from hydra tissue (Berking, 1977). Some hours after the end of the treatment with the inhibitor, bud formation is resumed. From the starting or restarting point of development after the inhibitory treatment to the visible beginning of bud formation, 4 intermediary stages were distinguished on the basis of different responses to a second treatment with inhibitor. The pre0treatment is followed immediately by a period of maximal sensitivity to the inhibitor, which varies in length. At the conclusion of this phase the time interval required for the visible appearance of buds is fixed (12 h). In this and the following phase another application of inhibitor can cancel the entire preparatory process from the pre-treatment onwards. A transition to near complete resistance to inhibitor is the basis for defining a third phase. In a fourth phase, immediately before the evagination of the bud starts, the proesence of the inhibitor will again hinder the development. Upon removal of the inhibitor the suppressed buds will appear.

Keywords:  Hydra; Inhibition; Morphogenesis

Year:  1977        PMID: 28305266     DOI: 10.1007/BF00848052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol        ISSN: 0340-0794


  11 in total

1.  Evidence for a foot-inhibiting substance in hydra.

Authors:  T Schmidt; H C Schaller
Journal:  Cell Differ       Date:  1976-10

2.  Bud formation inHydra: Inhibition by an endogenous morphogen.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1977-09

3.  Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth and morphogenesis in Hydra.

Authors:  H Bode; S Berking; C N David; A Gierer; H Schaller; E Trenkner
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1973-12

4.  Tissue dynamics of steady state growth in Hydra littoralis. II. Patterns of tissue movement.

Authors:  R D Campbell
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  The feedback inhibition of basal disk regeneration in Hydra has a continuously variable intensity.

Authors:  H K MacWilliams; F C Kafatos; W H Bossert
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Morphogenetic movements during budding in Hydra.

Authors:  S Shostak; D R Kankel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Bud morphogenesis in hydra.

Authors:  S G Clarkson; L Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Isolation and characterization of a low-molecular-weight substance activating head and bud formation in hydra.

Authors:  H C Schaller
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1973-02

9.  A theory of biological pattern formation.

Authors:  A Gierer; H Meinhardt
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1972-12

10.  Budding in hydra: the role of cell multiplication and cell movement in bud initiation.

Authors:  G Webster; S Hamilton
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1972-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Analysis of morphogenetic mutants of hydra : III.Maxi andMini.

Authors:  H C Schaller; T Schmidt; K Flick; C J P Grimmelikhuijzen
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1977-09

2.  Separation and specificity of action of four morphogens from hydra.

Authors:  H Chica Schaller; Tobias Schmidt; Cok J P Grimmelikhuijzen
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1979-06

3.  The fractionation of aHydra-derived inhibitor into head and foot inhibitors may be an artefact.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1983-11

4.  Evaluation of tentacle regeneration as a biological assay inHydra.

Authors:  Valerie Raabe Flechtner; Georgia Elizabeth Lesh-Laurie; Michael Kenneth Abbott
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1981-03

5.  Hydra pattern is controlled by two distinct but interacting morphogen sets.

Authors:  Somdatta Sinha; Sivatosh Mookerjee
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1984-01

6.  Analysis of head and foot formation inHydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1979-09

7.  The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts.

Authors:  H Chica Schaller
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1984-03

8.  Lithium ions interfere with pattern control in Hydra vulgaris.

Authors:  Monika Hassel; Stefan Berking
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1990-05

9.  Tumour-promoting phorbol esters rapidly inhibit bud formation in hydra.

Authors:  Yoshiki Shiba; Hiroshi Yamasaki; Yoshinobu Kanno
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1987-10

10.  Modulatory action of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on bud production inHydra.

Authors:  Yoshiki Shiba
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1981-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.