Literature DB >> 28304944

Analysis of head and foot formation inHydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor.

Stefan Berking1.   

Abstract

In tissue regenerating the head, the ability to initiate head formation in a host increases with the time allowed for regeneration before grafting, while the foot-initiating ability decreases concomitantly. The reverse was found for tissue about to regenerate a foot. The early divergent changes thus indicated are counteracted in both head and foot regeneration by treatment with an inhibitor (Berking, 1977) in low concentrations.The inhibitor also interferes with processes which determine wether or not hypostome and tentacles are formed, and how many tentacles (if any) appear. The circumferential spacing of the tentacles was regular whether their number was normal or below normal.Secondary axes caused by implanted tissue either detach after having formed a head and a foot (i.e. behave like buds) or do not detach, having only formed a head. This alternative depends on the origin and amount of the implanted tissue and on the position of the implant within the host.The following model based on these findings is proposed: Head and foot formation start with pre-patterns which cause a continuously increasing change of the tissue's ability to initiate a head or a foot. Along the body axis this ability is determined by a graded distribution of "sources". As development progresses, the high source density which accumulates in the head region causes the formation of a hypostome and tentacles; the angular spacing of tentacles is also dependent on source density. At a certain low source density foot-formation is initiated. The inhibitor counteracts the increase of source density in head-forming tissue as well as the decrease of source density in foot-forming tissue. It thus appears to be part of the mechanism which controls morphogenesis in hydra.

Keywords:  Hydra; Inhibitor; Model for Patterning; Morphogenesis; Regeneration

Year:  1979        PMID: 28304944     DOI: 10.1007/BF00848589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol        ISSN: 0340-0794


  15 in total

1.  CELLULAR SEGREGATION AND HETEROCYTIC DOMINANCE IN HYDRA.

Authors:  H M LENHOFF
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Bud formation inHydra: Inhibition by an endogenous morphogen.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1977-09

3.  Analysis of early stages of budding inHydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor.

Authors:  Stefan Berking; Alfred Gierer
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1977-06

4.  Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth and morphogenesis in Hydra.

Authors:  H Bode; S Berking; C N David; A Gierer; H Schaller; E Trenkner
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1973-12

5.  Experimental studies on axial polarity in hydra.

Authors:  O K Wilby; G Webster
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1970-11

6.  Hydra viridis: inhibition by the basal disk of basal disk differentiation.

Authors:  H K MacWilliams; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-03-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. I. Regional differences in time required for hypostome determination.

Authors:  G Webster; L Wolpert
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1966-08

8.  Regeneration of hydra from reaggregated cells.

Authors:  A Gierer; S Berking; H Bode; C N David; K Flick; G Hansmann; H Schaller; E Trenkner
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-09-27

9.  Positional information and pattern regulation in hydra: formation of the foot end.

Authors:  J Hicklin; L Wolpert
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1973-12

10.  Budding in hydra: the role of cell multiplication and cell movement in bud initiation.

Authors:  G Webster; S Hamilton
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1972-04
View more
  16 in total

1.  Metamorphosis ofHydractinia echinata Insights into pattern formation in Hydroids.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1984-11

2.  Properties of the foot inhibitor from hydra.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; H Chica Schaller
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1980-06

3.  Analysis of morphogenetic mutants of hydra : IV.Reg-16, a mutant deficient in head regeneration.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmner; H Chica Schaller
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1981-07

4.  Protein kinase modulators interfere with bud formation in Hydra vulgaris.

Authors:  Fernando Pérez; Stefan Berking
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1994-03

5.  Specification of the head-body proportion inHydra attenuata regenerating the head.

Authors:  Stefan Berking; Dietmar Schindler
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1983-11

6.  The fractionation of aHydra-derived inhibitor into head and foot inhibitors may be an artefact.

Authors:  Stefan Berking
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1983-11

7.  Evaluation of tentacle regeneration as a biological assay inHydra.

Authors:  Valerie Raabe Flechtner; Georgia Elizabeth Lesh-Laurie; Michael Kenneth Abbott
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1981-03

8.  The role of parental positional information in the determination of antero-posterior polarity during palleal budding in ascidians.

Authors:  Kazuo Kawamura; Hiroshi Watanabe
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1983-01

9.  Hydra pattern is controlled by two distinct but interacting morphogen sets.

Authors:  Somdatta Sinha; Sivatosh Mookerjee
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1984-01

10.  The influences of ecto- and endoderm in determining the axial polarity ofHydra attenuata Pall. (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa).

Authors:  Iris Smid; Pierre Tardent
Journal:  Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1982-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.