Literature DB >> 28303473

Incremental role of resting myocardial computed tomography perfusion for predicting physiologically significant coronary artery disease: A machine learning approach.

Donghee Han1,2, Ji Hyun Lee1,2, Asim Rizvi1, Heidi Gransar3, Lohendran Baskaran1, Joshua Schulman-Marcus1,4, Bríain Ó Hartaigh1, Fay Y Lin1, James K Min5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of resting myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) might serve as a useful addition for determining coronary artery disease. We aimed to evaluate the incremental benefit of resting CTP over coronary stenosis for predicting ischemia using a computational algorithm trained by machine learning methods.
METHODS: 252 patients underwent CCTA and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). CT stenosis was classified as 0%, 1-30%, 31-49%, 50-70%, and >70% maximal stenosis. Significant ischemia was defined as invasive FFR < 0.80. Resting CTP analysis was performed using a gradient boosting classifier for supervised machine learning.
RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values according to resting CTP when added to CT stenosis (>70%) for predicting ischemia were 68.3%, 52.7%, 84.6%, 78.2%, and 63.0%, respectively. Compared with CT stenosis [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.74], the addition of resting CTP appeared to improve discrimination (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81, P value .001) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement: 0.52, P value < .001) of ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of resting CTP analysis acquired from machine learning techniques may improve the predictive utility of significant ischemia over coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; machine learning; perfusion analysis; rest perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303473     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0834-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  29 in total

1.  Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  A R Jayaweera; K Wei; M Coggins; J P Bin; C Goodman; S Kaul
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.

Authors:  James K Min; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; Farouc A Jaffer; Jonathon Leipsic; Martin B Leon; G B John Mancini; Laura Mauri; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-08-07

5.  Classification accuracy and cut point selection.

Authors:  Xinhua Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Brian S Ko; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Michael Leung; Paul R Antonis; Arthur Nasis; Marcus Crossett; Sarah A Hope; Sam J Lehman; John Troupis; Tony DeFrance; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Additional diagnostic value of first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging without stress when combined with 64-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Osawa; Toru Miyoshi; Yasushi Koyama; Katsushi Hashimoto; Shuhei Sato; Kazufumi Nakamura; Nobuhiro Nishii; Kunihisa Kohno; Hiroshi Morita; Susumu Kanazawa; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Effect of contrast media on coronary vascular resistance: contrast-induced coronary vasodilation.

Authors:  E M Baile; P D Paré; Y D'yachkova; R G Carere
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Left ventricular hypertrophy, subclinical atherosclerosis, and inflammation.

Authors:  Sameer K Mehta; J Eduardo Rame; Amit Khera; Sabina A Murphy; Russell M Canham; Ronald M Peshock; James A de Lemos; Mark H Drazner
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Sung Shine Shim; Yookyung Kim; Soo Mee Lim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  16 in total

1.  The machine learning approach: Artificial intelligence is coming to support critical clinical thinking.

Authors:  Carmela Nappi; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: A radiomic guide to precision phenotyping of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Evangelos K Oikonomou; Musib Siddique; Charalambos Antoniades
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry.

Authors:  Lien-Hsin Hu; Julian Betancur; Tali Sharir; Andrew J Einstein; Sabahat Bokhari; Mathews B Fish; Terrence D Ruddy; Philipp A Kaufmann; Albert J Sinusas; Edward J Miller; Timothy M Bateman; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo Di Carli; Guido Germano; Frederic Commandeur; Joanna X Liang; Yuka Otaki; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Development and application of artificial intelligence in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Beibei Jiang; Ning Guo; Yinghui Ge; Lu Zhang; Matthijs Oudkerk; Xueqian Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Deep learning analysis of left ventricular myocardium in CT angiographic intermediate-degree coronary stenosis improves the diagnostic accuracy for identification of functionally significant stenosis.

Authors:  Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Majd Zreik; Michiel Voskuil; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum; Tim Leiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: state of the art and implications for the imaging cardiologist.

Authors:  K R Siegersma; T Leiner; D P Chew; Y Appelman; L Hofstra; J W Verjans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 8.  Machine Learning for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Cardiac CT: A Survey.

Authors:  Nils Hampe; Jelmer M Wolterink; Sanne G M van Velzen; Tim Leiner; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 9.  Image-Based Cardiac Diagnosis With Machine Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Carlos Martin-Isla; Victor M Campello; Cristian Izquierdo; Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Bettina Baeßler; Steffen E Petersen; Karim Lekadir
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-01-24

10.  Machine Learning Framework to Identify Individuals at Risk of Rapid Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: From the PARADIGM Registry.

Authors:  Donghee Han; Kranthi K Kolli; Subhi J Al'Aref; Lohendran Baskaran; Alexander R van Rosendael; Heidi Gransar; Daniele Andreini; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Kavitha Chinnaiyan; Jung Hyun Choi; Edoardo Conte; Hugo Marques; Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves; Ilan Gottlieb; Martin Hadamitzky; Jonathon A Leipsic; Erica Maffei; Gianluca Pontone; Gilbert L Raff; Sangshoon Shin; Yong-Jin Kim; Byoung Kwon Lee; Eun Ju Chun; Ji Min Sung; Sang-Eun Lee; Renu Virmani; Habib Samady; Peter Stone; Jagat Narula; Daniel S Berman; Jeroen J Bax; Leslee J Shaw; Fay Y Lin; James K Min; Hyuk-Jae Chang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.