| Literature DB >> 28303006 |
Ghaith Aljayyoussi1, Hayley E Tyrer1, Louise Ford1, Hanna Sjoberg1, Nicolas Pionnier1, David Waterhouse1, Jill Davies1, Joanne Gamble1, Haelly Metuge2,3, Darren A N Cook1, Andrew Steven1, Raman Sharma1, Ana F Guimaraes1, Rachel H Clare1, Andrew Cassidy1, Kelly L Johnston1, Laura Myhill1, Laura Hayward1, Samuel Wanji2,3, Joseph D Turner1, Mark J Taylor4, Stephen A Ward1.
Abstract
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) and onchocerciasis are priority neglected tropical diseases targeted for elimination. The only safe drug treatment with substantial curative activity against the filarial nematodes responsible for LF (Brugia malayi, Wuchereria bancrofti) or onchocerciasis (Onchocerca volvulus) is doxycycline. The target of doxycycline is the essential endosymbiont, Wolbachia. Four to six weeks doxycycline therapy achieves >90% depletion of Wolbachia in worm tissues leading to blockade of embryogenesis, adult sterility and premature death 18-24 months post-treatment. Long treatment length and contraindications in children and pregnancy are obstacles to implementing doxycycline as a public health strategy. Here we determine, via preclinical infection models of Brugia malayi or Onchocerca ochengi that elevated exposures of orally-administered rifampicin can lead to Wolbachia depletions from filariae more rapidly than those achieved by doxycycline. Dose escalation of rifampicin achieves >90% Wolbachia depletion in time periods of 7 days in B. malayi and 14 days in O. ochengi. Using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and mouse-human bridging analysis, we conclude that clinically relevant dose elevations of rifampicin, which have recently been determined as safe in humans, could be administered as short courses to filariasis target populations with potential to reduce anti-Wolbachia curative therapy times to between one and two weeks.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28303006 PMCID: PMC5428297 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00322-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
In-vitro and in-vivo IC50 values of doxycycline and rifampicin calculated based on the individual potency of each drug in the dose escalation studies in animals using PK-PD modelling.
| Drug | Doxycycline | Rifampicin | Ratio (doxycycline/rifampicin) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 1.3 | 16.9 | |
| 1059 | 65 | 16.3 |
Figure 1Pharmacokinetic profiles. Systemic exposure to doxycycline (DOX) and rifampicin (RIF) in BALB/c SCID mice are shown as follows. (a) PK profile of DOX after single 25 mg/kg dose. (b) PK profile of DOX at day 7 after 7 bi-daily 25 mg/kg doses. (c) PK profile of RIF after single 25 mg/kg dose. (d) PK profile of RIF at day 7 after 7 bi-daily 25 mg/kg doses.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of doxycycline and rifampicin and after single dose and chronic dose administration.
| Drug | Doxycycline | Rifampicin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Single | 7 day | Single | 7 day |
| 25 mg/kg | 25 mg/kg | 25 mg/kg | 25 mg/kg | |
| 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.11 | 0.128 | |
| 7.0 | 8.2 | 1.45 | 1.551 | |
| 12.2 | 15.6 | 90.9 | 81.3 | |
Figure 2Pharmacological Outputs: Anti-filarial, anti-Wolbachia pharmacological effects of doxycycline (DOX) and rifampicin (RIF) in vivo. immediate pharmacological effects of DOX and RIF on Brugia malayi female adult Wolbachia loads (a,b) or post-washout (c,d). Effects on B. malayi microfilariae (Bmmf) production (e). Effects on Onchocerca ochengi male adult Wolbachia loads post-washout (f,g). Box and whiskers represent min-max (n = 10–29; B. malayi Wolbachia, n = 4–25; Bmmf, n = 5–17 O. ochengi Wolbachia). Solid line = control median Wolbachia level, long dashed line = 90%, short dashed line = 99% depletion level. Significance indicated *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Adult B. malayi or O. ochengi worm burden recoveries post-dosing.
| Treatment Species | Vehicle | DOX | RIF | Vehicle | DOX | RIF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| — | 25 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 35 | 25 | — | 25 | 35 | 35 |
|
| — | bid | bid | qd | qd | qd | bid | — | bid | qd | qd |
|
| 28–42 | 28 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 28 | 28 | 7 | 14 |
|
| 25 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 248 | 27 | 67 | 73 | 34 | 78 | 100 | 19 | 13 | 5 | 7 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 9 | 6 | 24 | 23 | 2 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 34 | 10 | 29 | 27 | 9 | 23 | 21 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 159 | 17 | 49 | 54 | 22 | 51 | 50 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 6 | 4 | 15 | 12.5 | 1 | 16.5 | 5 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 23 | 7 | 23 | 18 | 6 | 18 | 12 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 53 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 10 | 29 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 7 |
Figure 3Human-Mouse Bridging. PK profile of rifampicin in mouse at 15MKD (Black solid line) in comparison to exposures expected in man based on 600 mg dosing in 70 kg individuals (a) (green solid line representing median prediction and dashed red lines representing 5% and 95% percentiles of the prediction). % Probability of achieving optimal rifampicin exposure in humans at a dosing range of 4 mg/kg–45 mg/kg (b). (optimal exposure is defined as the median total 24 hour steady state AUC in mice receiving daily 15 mg/kg dose).