Literature DB >> 28302948

The accuracy of the CAD system using intraoral and extraoral scanners for designing of fixed dental prostheses.

Sakura Shimizu1, Akikazu Shinya1, Soichi Kuroda1, Harunori Gomi1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of prostheses affects clinical success and is, in turn, affected by the accuracy of the scanner and CAD programs. Thus, their accuracy is important. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner with active triangulation (Cerec Omnicam), an intraoral scanner with a confocal laser (3Shape Trios), and an extraoral scanner with active triangulation (D810). The second aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the digital crowns designed with two different scanner/CAD combinations. The accuracy of the intraoral scanners and extraoral scanner was clinically acceptable. Marginal and internal fit of the digital crowns fabricated using the intraoral scanner and CAD programs were inferior to those fabricated using the extraoral scanner and CAD programs.

Keywords:  Accuracy; CAD software; CAD/CAM; Extraoral scanner; Intraoral scanner

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28302948     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  7 in total

1.  Marginal and internal fit of feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM crowns fabricated via different extraoral digitization methods: a micro-computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Ece İrem Oğuz; Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan; Mert Ocak; Burak Bilecenoğlu; Zeynep Ekici
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of International Standard Spherical Model by Digital Dental Scanners.

Authors:  Hong Xin Cai; Qi Jia; HaoYu Shi; Yujie Jiang; Jingnan Xue; ChunXu Chen; Haotian Gong; Jie Liu; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  In-vitro evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using digital scanning technologies.

Authors:  Çise Özal; Mutahhar Ulusoy
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Efficiency of occlusal and interproximal adjustments in CAD-CAM manufactured single implant crowns - cast-free vs 3D printed cast-based.

Authors:  Tobias Graf; Jan-Frederik Güth; Christian Diegritz; Anja Liebermann; Josef Schweiger; Oliver Schubert
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ali Mahmoud Hashemi; Hamid Mahmoud Hashemi; Hakimeh Siadat; Ahmadreza Shamshiri; Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.

Authors:  Naiyu Cui; Jiayin Wang; Xingyu Hou; Shixun Sun; Qixuan Huang; Ho-Kyung Lim; HongXin Cai; Qi Jia; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 7.  Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Se-Wook Pyo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.