Clement J Bottino1, Erinn T Rhodes2, Catherine Kreatsoulas3, Joanne E Cox4, Eric W Fleegler5. 1. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: clement.bottino@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 3. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, Mass. 4. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe a clinical approach for food insecurity screening incorporating a menu offering food-assistance referrals, and to examine relationships between food insecurity and referral selection. METHODS: Caregivers of 3- to 10-year-old children presenting for well-child care completed a self-administered questionnaire on a laptop computer. Items included the US Household Food Security Survey Module: 6-Item Short Form (food insecurity screen) and a referral menu offering assistance with: 1) finding a food pantry, 2) getting hot meals, 3) applying for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and 4) applying for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Referrals were offered independent of food insecurity status or eligibility. We examined associations between food insecurity and referral selection using multiple logistic regression while adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 340 caregivers participated; 106 (31.2%) reported food insecurity, and 107 (31.5%) selected one or more referrals. Forty-nine caregivers (14.4%) reported food insecurity but selected no referrals; 50 caregivers (14.7%) selected one or more referrals but did not report food insecurity; and 57 caregivers (16.8%) both reported food insecurity and selected one or more referrals. After adjustment, caregivers who selected one or more referrals had greater odds of food insecurity compared to caregivers who selected no referrals (adjusted odds ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval 2.4-7.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, there was incomplete overlap between food insecurity and referral selection. Offering referrals may be a helpful adjunct to standard screening for eliciting family preferences and identifying unmet social needs.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a clinical approach for food insecurity screening incorporating a menu offering food-assistance referrals, and to examine relationships between food insecurity and referral selection. METHODS: Caregivers of 3- to 10-year-old children presenting for well-child care completed a self-administered questionnaire on a laptop computer. Items included the US Household Food Security Survey Module: 6-Item Short Form (food insecurity screen) and a referral menu offering assistance with: 1) finding a food pantry, 2) getting hot meals, 3) applying for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and 4) applying for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Referrals were offered independent of food insecurity status or eligibility. We examined associations between food insecurity and referral selection using multiple logistic regression while adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 340 caregivers participated; 106 (31.2%) reported food insecurity, and 107 (31.5%) selected one or more referrals. Forty-nine caregivers (14.4%) reported food insecurity but selected no referrals; 50 caregivers (14.7%) selected one or more referrals but did not report food insecurity; and 57 caregivers (16.8%) both reported food insecurity and selected one or more referrals. After adjustment, caregivers who selected one or more referrals had greater odds of food insecurity compared to caregivers who selected no referrals (adjusted odds ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval 2.4-7.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, there was incomplete overlap between food insecurity and referral selection. Offering referrals may be a helpful adjunct to standard screening for eliciting family preferences and identifying unmet social needs.
Authors: Andrew F Beck; Alicia J Cohen; Jeffrey D Colvin; Caroline M Fichtenberg; Eric W Fleegler; Arvin Garg; Laura M Gottlieb; Matthew S Pantell; Megan T Sandel; Adam Schickedanz; Robert S Kahn Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Stephenie C Lemon; Karen Burns White; Nicole Casanova; Laura S Dominici; John K Erban; Rachel A Freedman; Ted A James; Naomi Y Ko; Amy M LeClair; Beverly Moy; Susan K Parsons; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Sarah Polk; Kathryn M Leifheit; Rachel Thornton; Barry S Solomon; Lisa Ross DeCamp Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Jennifer A Makelarski; Emily Abramsohn; Jasmine H Benjamin; Senxi Du; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 9.308