Felipe Bochnia Cerci1. 1. Hospital Santa Casa de Curitiba - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.
Abstract
Staged retroauricular flap is a great option for full-thickness defects along the helical rim and antihelix. Donor site consists of the posterior ear, postauricular sulcus and mastoid area. The advantages of this flap include hidden donor scar, donor tissue similarity and rich vascularity. We present a case of collision tumor on the left helix treated with Mohs micrographic surgery and the resulting full-thickness defect repaired with a staged retroauricular flap. This flap is an effective technique for full-thickness helical defect repair with relatively little operative morbidity. High esthetic and functional results may be obtained restoring the ear size and shape.
Staged retroauricular flap is a great option for full-thickness defects along the helical rim and antihelix. Donor site consists of the posterior ear, postauricular sulcus and mastoid area. The advantages of this flap include hidden donor scar, donor tissue similarity and rich vascularity. We present a case of collision tumor on the left helix treated with Mohs micrographic surgery and the resulting full-thickness defect repaired with a staged retroauricular flap. This flap is an effective technique for full-thickness helical defect repair with relatively little operative morbidity. High esthetic and functional results may be obtained restoring the ear size and shape.
Staged flaps are excellent choices for reconstruction of ear defects of varying
complexity and location. Wounds along the helical rim, lobule, antihelix and conchal
bowl may be resurfaced with either staged pre-auricular or retroauricular
flaps.[1,2]The staged retroauricular flap (SRF) is more often used and is most applicable to
repair full-thickness helical rim and antihelix defects. Donor site consists of the
posterior ear, postauricular sulcus and mastoid area. Advantages of this flap
include donor tissue similarity, rich vascularity and hidden donor scar.[1,2,3] Its main
disadvantage is the necessity for a two-stage procedure.
CASE REPORT
A 52-year-old male patient was referred to the department of dermatology to evaluate
an erythematous plaque (1.6 cm x 1.4 cm) involving the left helix. Biopsy revealed a
collision tumor consisting of an infiltrative basal cell carcinoma and an invasive
squamous cell carcinoma.The patient was submitted to Mohs micrographic surgery under local anesthesia with
bupivacaine and lidocaine. After two stages, clear margins were achieved. The
resulting defect measured 1.9 cm x 1.7 cm and affected the left helix (Figure 1). Part of the cartilage was removed
leading to a full-thickness defect. Due to the horizontal configuration of the
defect, and after discussing outcomes with the patient, it was opted for a staged
retroauricular flap repair.
Figure 1
Full - thickness defect involving the left helix after Mohs surgery
Full - thickness defect involving the left helix after Mohs surgeryFirst, assessment of the anterior and posterior components of the primary defect was
made. The auricle was pressed against the mastoid to outline the vertical length of
the flap (Figure 2). Then, in order to recreate
the helix curvature, a cartilage graft was harvested from the ipsilateral antihelix
and sutured into the defect (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Flap design (dashed line). Donor sites include the postauricular ear,
sulcus, and mastoid area. The vertical height of the flap equals that of
the defect on the helical rim. The pedicle base is slightly widened for
a better blood supply
Figure 3
A: Cartilage graft (white arrow) harvested from the
antihelix (black arrow). B: Cartilage graft sutured into
place
Flap design (dashed line). Donor sites include the postauricular ear,
sulcus, and mastoid area. The vertical height of the flap equals that of
the defect on the helical rim. The pedicle base is slightly widened for
a better blood supplyA: Cartilage graft (white arrow) harvested from the
antihelix (black arrow). B: Cartilage graft sutured into
placeThe remaining of the flap was designed with two horizontal lines from the
retroauricular skin towards the hairline with progressive pedicle widening. The flap
was elevated above the perichondrium and fascia to ensure rich blood supply (Figure 4A). The mastoid scalp was slightly
undermined to increase flap mobility. The distal flap was thinned to obtain an
adequate thickness match and sutured into the defect. Part of the anterior defect
was left to heal by secondary intention (Figure
4B-C) and a gauze was
sutured (for 3 days) at the antihelical groove to help reestablish a natural-looking
proximal helical rim curvature (Figure 4D).
Figure 4
A: Flap elevated above perichondrium and fascia to ensure a
rich blood supply. B: Anterior portion of the defect
partially left to heal by secondary intention. C:
Postauricular pedicle (arrow). D: Gauze sutured into the
sulcus to help reestablish a natural- -looking proximal helical rim
curvature
A: Flap elevated above perichondrium and fascia to ensure a
rich blood supply. B: Anterior portion of the defect
partially left to heal by secondary intention. C:
Postauricular pedicle (arrow). D: Gauze sutured into the
sulcus to help reestablish a natural- -looking proximal helical rim
curvatureDonor site was left to heal by secondary intention. Gauze was also inserted into the
postauricular tunnel for hemostasis, comfort and prevention of contact between
primary and secondary wounds.After 3 weeks, the flap was divided at its posterior attachment and thinned to
provide precise fit and contour. The edges were curled over the helical rim and
sutured onto the posterior primary defect (Figure
5). The remaining pedicle was discarded and the donor area was left to
heal by secondary intention. Two months postoperatively, the patient had a
satisfactory result with helical rim restoration (Figure 6).
Figure 5
“Flap thinning during the second stage (arrow)
Figure 6
Two months postoperative. Contour, substance, and integrity of the
helical rim have been maintained
“Flap thinning during the second stage (arrow)Two months postoperative. Contour, substance, and integrity of the
helical rim have been maintained
DISCUSSION
Auricular reconstruction may be challenging due to the complex topography of the ear.
Distortions in the ear architecture or symmetry can affect facial
aesthetics.[2] Several
reconstructive options are available and should be individualized according to each
case and surgeon´s preference. Skin grafts, one-stage flaps, or secondary intention
healing usually offer good results on the ear.[3,4] Ear staged flaps are
often reserved for complex defects, cosmetically sensitive patients or for
functional restoration.[5]The staged retroauricular flap (SRF) is a random-pattern flap with a rich vascular
supply based on branches of the posterior auricular, superficial temporal and
occipital arteries. The main disadvantage of this flap is the need for two stages to
complete the procedure.[1,2] Posterior ear, postauricular sulcus
and mastoid area provide good skin color/texture match for excellent cosmetic
results.[5]Although full-thickness defects may be restored in single-stage procedures, SRF can
restore the ear to its previous size and shape.[6] In the present case, a wedge resection was also considered.
However, due to the horizontal orientation of the defect, a significant non-affected
area would have been removed, leading to a substantial reduction in the ear
size.Loss of cartilage can be tolerated without adverse sequelae for most ear defects,
considering that the ear is an excellent donor site for cartilage grafts in nasal
reconstruction.[7,8] If the primary defect involves
complete loss of a portion of the helical rim and a small amount of cartilage, the
flap may be folded onto itself to provide adequate thickness and support without a
cartilage graft. For larger defects, cartilage replacement may be required for
support. In these cases, cartilage may restore esthetic contour and/or structural
integrity and stability.[5]Recreation of the helical rim curvature is challenging. Distinct techniques may be
employed, including basting sutures, jelly roll flap and secondary intention
healing. Basting sutures are more successful during the first stage to recreate the
helical sulcus since wound healing and flap contraction at the second stage may
distort the sulcus.[2] The jelly roll
technique consists of doubling up the skin flap into a roll to simulate the soft
tissue that overlies the cartilage. Horizontal mattress sutures behind the flap
leading edge place the helical skin under compression and create
redundancy.[9] Secondary
intention healing of the anterior portion of the defect (if limited in size)
naturally helps to recreate the sulcus, as in the present case. Regardless of the
technique implemented, flaps should not be placed under tension since this will
attenuate and flatten the sulcus.The donor area is left to heal entirely by secondary intention or may be partially
covered with the remaining pedicle after the second stage.[1,2,6] Safety of performing SRF under local
anesthesia has been well documented with low complication rates when applied with
appropriate techniques.[10] SRF is
an effective repair method for full-thickness helical defects that has relatively
little operative morbidity. High esthetic and functional results may be obtained
restoring the ear size and shape.
Authors: Phillip C Hochwalt; Kevin N Christensen; Sean R Cantwell; Thomas L Hocker; Jerry D Brewer; Christian L Baum; Christopher J Arpey; Clark C Otley; Randall K Roenigk Journal: Dermatol Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.398