Literature DB >> 25545178

Comparison of full-thickness skin grafts versus second-intention healing for Mohs defects of the helix.

Phillip C Hochwalt1, Kevin N Christensen, Sean R Cantwell, Thomas L Hocker, Jerry D Brewer, Christian L Baum, Christopher J Arpey, Clark C Otley, Randall K Roenigk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two repair options for Mohs defects of the helix include full-thickness skin grafting and second-intention healing. Limited long-term data exist comparing these 2 repair options.
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) versus second-intention wound healing for Mohs defects on the helix.
METHODS: In this study, 29 second-intention and 18 FTSG repairs were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patient questionnaires and retrospective chart analysis were used to assess secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: The average second-intention VAS score was 82.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.6), and the average FTSG VAS score was 75.2 (SD = 16.7) (difference of 6.9, 95% confidence interval: -1.3 to 15.1, p = .061). A subsequent noninferiority test indicated that cosmetic outcome of second-intention healing was at least as good as that of FTSG in the authors' study (p < .001). Retrospective chart analysis revealed no significant difference in complications. Patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: Mohs surgical defects of the helix left to heal by second-intention have comparable long-term cosmetic outcomes to those repaired by FTSG. There was no significant difference in complications, and patients were highly satisfied with both repair options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25545178     DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  3 in total

1.  Repair of auricular defects following Mohs micrographic surgery or excision: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathryn T Shahwan; Gabriel J Amon; Laura K Archibald; Caitlin Bakker; Adam R Mattox; Murad Alam; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 2.  Review and reappraisal of assessment parameters of second intention healing after Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Gabrielle Schwartzman; Alexander M Cartron; Amor Khachemoune
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.017

3.  Staged retroauricular flap for helical reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Felipe Bochnia Cerci
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.