| Literature DB >> 28299338 |
Pingyao Xie1, Lili Cui2, Yuan Shan2, Wen-Yi Kang1.
Abstract
The compounds of Radix Paeoniae Rubra (RPR) were isolated and identified by bioassay-guided method, and antithrombotic effects and mechanism were investigated by the acute blood stasis rat model. The RPR extract was evaluated by APTT, TT, PT, and FIB assays in vitro. Results indicated that RPR extract exhibited the anticoagulant activity. In order to find active compounds, six compounds were isolated and identified, and four compounds, paeoniflorin (Pae), pentagalloylglucose (Pen), albiflorin (Ali), and protocatechuic acid (Pro), exhibited the anticoagulant activity in vitro. Therefore, the antithrombosis effects of RPR extract and four active compounds were investigated in vivo by measuring whole blood viscosity (WBV), plasma viscosity (PV), APTT, PT, TT, and FIB. Meanwhile, the levels of TXB2, 6-Keto-PGF1α , eNOS, and ET-1 were detected. Results suggested that RPR extract and four active compounds had the inhibition effect on thrombus formation, and the antithrombotic effects were associated with the regulation of vascular endothelium active substance, activating blood flow and anticoagulation effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28299338 PMCID: PMC5337344 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9475074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract and six compounds in vitro (n = 4; p < 0.001 or 0.001 < p < 0.01 or p < 0.05 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 or 0.001 < ##p < 0.01 or #p < 0.05 versus breviscapine).
Effect on WBV (mPa·s) at various shear rates.
| Group | WBV (mPa·s) | PV (mPa·s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200/S | 30/S | 3/S | 30/s | |
| Con | 4.34 ± 0.20 | 5.45 ± 0.33 | 9.88 ± 0.61 | 1.23 ± 0.03 |
| Mod | 5.44 ± 0.17 | 6.80 ± 0.14 | 12.66 ± 0.25 | 1.42 ± 0.03 |
| Asp | 4.67 ± 0.47### | 5.75 ± 0.19### | 9.98 ± 0.36### | 1.27 ± 0.03### |
| Ret | 4.68 ± 0.17### | 6.04 ± 0.45## | 10.39 ± 0.68### | 1.29 ± 0.01### |
| Rea | 4.67 ± 0.46### | 5.80 ± 0.56### | 10.17 ± 0.41### | 1.29 ± 0.05### |
| Rbu | 4.64 ± 0.43### | 5.60 ± 0.61### | 10.38 ± 0.54### | 1.26 ± 0.04### |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8, p < 0.001 versus control group, ###p < 0.001 and 0.001 < ##p < 0.01 versus model group.
Effect on ESR and PCV.
| Group | Dose (g/kg) | ESR (mm·h−1) | PCV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 3.00 ± 0.08 | 37.15 ± 2.46 |
| Mod | — | 11.60 ± 1.14 | 46.83 ± 0.71 |
| Asp | 0.1 | 7.40 ± 0.55### | 38.92 ± 1.04### |
| Ret | 1.2 | 6.79 ± 0.84### | 41.71 ± 1.30###△ |
| Rea | 1.2 | 7.80 ± 0.84### | 39.73 ± 2.33### |
| Rbu | 1.2 | 6.80 ± 0.84### | 39.73 ± 1.82### |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8, p < 0.001 versus control group, ###p < 0.001 versus model group, and △p < 0.05 versus aspirin.
Figure 2Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract in vivo (n = 8; p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 versus aspirin; #p < 0.05 versus model group).
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1 in serum.
| Group | Dose (g/kg) | 6-Keto-PGF1 | TXB2 | TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 91.79 ± 7.38 | 83.36 ± 6.75 | 0.911 ± 0.08 |
| Mod | — | 81.26 ± 2.05 | 108.78 ± 3.79 | 1.34 ± 0.06 |
| Asp | 0.1 | 90.58 ± 4.56# | 81.90 ± 4.38### | 0.910 ± 0.07### |
| Ret | 1.2 | 96.27 ± 8.13### | 83.52 ± 3.74### | 0.874 ± 0.10###△△△ |
| Rea | 1.2 | 86.81 ± 6.10 | 84.42 ± 7.96### | 0.976 ± 0.11### |
| Rbu | 1.2 | 91.24 ± 5.36# | 99.24 ± 6.93##△△△ | 1.09 ± 0.09###△△△ |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8; p < 0.001 or p < 0.05 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 or 0.01 < ##p < 0.001 or #p < 0.05 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 versus aspirin.
Figure 3The effects of RPR treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n = 8; p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 or 0.001 < ##p < 0.01 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 or △p < 0.05 versus aspirin; #p < 0.05).
Effect on WBV (mPa·s) at various shear rates.
| Group | Dose | WBV (mPa·s) | PV (mPa·s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200/S | 30/S | 3/S | 30/S | ||
| Con | — | 3.96 ± 0.11 | 5.26 ± 0.09 | 10.06 ± 0.21 | 1.27 ± 0.04 |
| Mod | — | 5.29 ± 0.18 | 6.60 ± 0.23 | 12.55 ± 0.43 | 1.41 ± 0.03 |
| Xdi | 3.6 mL/Kg | 4.14 ± 0.04### | 5.28 ± 0.19### | 10.49 ± 0.86### | 1.27 ± 0.01### |
| Pro | 5.0 mg/Kg | 4.77 ± 0.09###△△△ | 5.82 ± 0.11###△△△ | 11.10 ± 0.18### | 1.36 ± 0.03#△△△ |
| Ali | 5.0 mg/Kg | 4.37 ± 0.17###△△ | 5.39 ± 0.26### | 10.27 ± 0.47### | 1.33 ± 0.03###△ |
| Pae | 5.0 mg/Kg | 4.46 ± 0.11###△△△ | 5.58 ± 0.12###△△ | 10.62 ± 0.23### | 1.35 ± 0.03#△△△ |
| Pen | 5.0 mg/Kg | 4.63 ± 0.05###△△△ | 5.69 ± 0.99###△△ | 10.70 ± 0.39### | 1.34 ± 0.02##△△ |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8, p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001, 0.001 < ##p < 0.01, and #p < 0.05 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001, 0.001 < △△p < 0.01, and △p < 0.05 versus Xdi.
Effect on ESR and PCV.
| Group | Dose | ESR (mm·h−1) | PCV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 3.00 ± 0.82 | 36.04 ± 1.23 |
| Mod | — | 10.50 ± 0.58 | 45.80 ± 1.30 |
| Xdi | 3.6 mL/Kg | 7.25 ± 0.50### | 37.11 ± 1.73### |
| Pro | 5 mg/Kg | 8.50 ± 0.58## | 40.73 ± 1.16###△△ |
| Ali | 5 mg/Kg | 8.5 ± 1.29## | 37.56 ± 2.37### |
| Pae | 5 mg/Kg | 8.75 ± 1.7#△ | 38.68 ± 1.48### |
| Pen | 5 mg/Kg | 8.90 ± 0.84#△ | 39.55 ± 1.48###△ |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8, p < 0.001 versus control group, and ###p < 0.001 or 0.001 < ##p < 0.01 or #p < 0.05 versus model group, and 0.001 < △△p < 0.01 or △p < 0.05 versus Xdi.
Figure 4Anticoagulation activity of active compounds in vivo (n = 8; p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 or #p < 0.05 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 or △p < 0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001 < △△p < 0.01).
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1 in serum.
| Group | Dose | 6-Keto-PGF1 | TXB2 | TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | — | 1.358 ± 0.11 | 100.74 ± 2.58 | 1.358 ± 0.11 |
| Mod | — | 1.872 ± 0.10 | 109.63 ± 1.00 | 1.872 ± 0.10 |
| Xdi | 3.6 mL/Kg | 1.178 ± .015### | 100.24 ± 3.16### | 1.178 ± .015### |
| Pro | 5 mg/Kg | 1.479 ± 0.04###△△△ | 106.25 ± 3.58 | 1.479 ± 0.04###△△△ |
| Ali | 5 mg/Kg | 1.406 ± 0.11###△△ | 100.36 ± 1.05### | 1.406 ± 0.11###△△ |
| Pae | 5 mg/Kg | 1.208 ± 0.08### | 106.42 ± 2.32 | 1.208 ± 0.08### |
| Pen | 5 mg/Kg | 1.198 ± 0.07### | 101.23 ± 2.35### | 1.198 ± 0.07### |
Data represent mean ± SD. n = 8; p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 or 0.01 < △△p < 0.001 versus Xdi.
Figure 5The effects of active compounds treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n = 8; p < 0.001 versus control group; ###p < 0.001 or 0.001 < ##p < 0.01 versus model group; △△△p < 0.001 or △p < 0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001 < p < 0.01 versus control group).