Literature DB >> 28298190

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin has an advantage over serum cystatin C and glomerular filtration rate in prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Olga L Barbarash1,2, Irina S Bykova1, Vasiliy V Kashtalap1,2, Mikhail V Zykov1, Oksana N Hryachkova1, Victoria V Kalaeva1, Kristina S Shafranskaya1, Victoria N Karetnikova1,2, Anton G Kutikhin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess significance of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) and cystatin C (sCC) in prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: We recruited 357 consecutive patients who were admitted to the hospital within 24 h after onset of STEMI. On the 1st and 12th-14th day after hospital admission, we measured levels of sNGAL and sCC. We also determined presence of renal dysfunction (RD), defined as glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. After 3 years of follow-up, we performed a logistic regression and assessed the value of RD, sNGAL, and sCC in prediction of combined endpoint, defined as cardiovascular death or any cardiovascular complication.
RESULTS: RD, sCC level ≥ 1.9 mg/L, and sNGAL level ≥ 1.25 ng/mL on the 12th-14th day of hospitalization were associated with a 1.6-fold, 1.9-fold, and 2.9-fold higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcome, respectively. Area under the ROC curve was the highest for the model based on sNGAL level compared to the models based on sCC level or RD presence.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of sNGAL level in patients with STEMI on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission may improve prediction of adverse cardiovascular outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystatin C; Glomerular filtration rate; Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; Renal dysfunction; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28298190      PMCID: PMC5353887          DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0514-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord        ISSN: 1471-2261            Impact factor:   2.298


Background

According to the World Health Organization statistics, coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death worldwide [1]. An estimated 7.4 million people died from CAD in 2012, representing 11.2% of all global deaths [1]. In the Russian Federation alone, there were 597,921 deaths from CAD, which is the highest number amongst all countries included into analysis [1]. A number of investigations revealed a significant association of renal dysfunction [RD, defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2] with a high risk of cardiovascular death or acute cardiovascular events [2-4]. Moreover, RD is significantly associated with an adverse cardiovascular outcome in patients with CAD [5]. A critical decrease in GFR and albuminuria commonly occur at the late stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) when > 30% of nephrons are affected [6]. However, there is a crucial need in novel, highly sensitive and specific markers of RD at the early stages of CKD. Recently, serum cystatin C (sCC) and serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) were suggested as the promising candidates [7, 8]. It is known that CC arises in all nucleated cells and is one of the most important endogenous inhibitors of cysteine proteinases whilst NGAL is produced by tubular epithelial cells and neutrophils in response to inflammation or ischemia, inhibiting bacterial growth and inducing epithelial cell proliferation [9]. The diagnostic value of sCC and sNGAL was shown for acute kidney injury, progression of CKD, and acute cardiorenal syndrome [10, 11]. Moreover, there is growing evidence of sCC and sNGAL importance in atherosclerosis and myocardial remodeling [12, 13]. In addition, sCC and sNGAL are associated with the risk factors of atherosclerosis [14, 15]. We carried out this study with the aim to investigate the value of sCC and sNGAL in prediction of an adverse cardiovascular outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We recruited 357 patients who were admitted within 24 h of STEMI onset to Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases (Kemerovo, Russian Federation) in 2012–2013. The study was performed in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The local ethical committee approved the study and all the participants provided written informed consent after a full explanation of the study was given to them. The criteria of inclusion into the study were 1) age > 18 years; 2) diagnosis of STEMI according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines [16]; 3) written informed consent to participate in the study. Criteria of exclusion were 1) age < 18 years; 2) past medical history of cancer, concomitant autoimmune and/or mental disorders; 3) recurrent MI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Stable angina, congestive heart failure, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus were diagnosed according to ESC guidelines on the management of stable CAD [17], ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure [18], ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension [19], ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias [20], and ESC/EASD Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [21], respectively. Smoking, body mass index, past medical history of MI or stroke, and family history of CAD were defined using the medical records. Clinicopathological features of the patients are represented in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinicopathological features of the patients, n = 357

FeatureValue
Female gender, n (%)99 (27.7)
Mean age, years (95% confidence interval)61.3 (59.9–62.6)
Stable angina, n (%)176 (49.3)
Congestive heart failure, n (%)75 (21.0)
Arterial hypertension, n (%)301 (84.3)
Hypercholesterolemia, n (%)87 (24.4)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)60 (16.8)
Smoking, n (%)180 (50.4)
Body mass index > 25 kg/m2, n (%)265 (74.2)
Past medical history of myocardial infarction, n (%)65 (18.2)
Past medical history of stroke, n (%)31 (8.7)
Family history of coronary artery disease, n (%)91 (25.5)
Clinicopathological features of the patients, n = 357 Selective coronary angiography was performed within the first hours after hospital admission using GE Healthcare Innova 3100 Cardiac Angiography System (General Electric Healthcare). Colour duplex screening of the extracranial arteries (ECA) and lower extremity arteries (LEA) was performed on the 5th-7th day after hospital admission in all patients using the cardiovascular ultrasound system Vivid 7 Dimension (General Electric Healthcare) with a 5.7 MHz linear array transducer (for ECA), a 2.5–3 MHz curved array transducer, and a 5 MHz linear array transducer (for LEA). An extent of arterial stenosis was assessed in B regimen and by dopplerography (visualizing the local haemodynamics in the stenosis zone). Common and internal carotid arteries, vertebral, and subclavian arteries were visualized from both sides during the ECA screening; common and deep femoral arteries, popliteal, anterior and posterior tibial arteries were visualized from both sides during the LEA screening. The intima-media thickness (IMT) of common carotid artery was measured in the automatic mode (the value < 1 mm was considered normal). Polyvascular disease was defined as an increase in IMT ≥ 1 mm or ECA and/or LEA stenosis. The preferable methods of myocardial reperfusion were defined in the shortest terms and included PCI or systemic thrombolytic therapy (TLT). Myocardial revascularization was not conducted when technical problems occurred or in patients with complex coronary anatomy or those with contraindications to TLT or PCI. All patients received the standard therapy of unfractionated heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and statins. Long-acting nitrates, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, inotropic and antiarrhythmic drugs were prescribed if needed. Serum creatinine level was measured at hospital admission and before hospital discharge with the further calculation of GFR by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. In the case of in-hospital death, the final level of serum creatinine was taken into account. RD was defined as GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The levels of sCC and sNGAL were measured on the 1st and 12th-14th day after hospital admission by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the respective kits of R&D Systems according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Reference values for sCC were 0.52–0.90 mg/L and 0.56–0.98 mg/L for females and males, respectively. Reference values for sNGAL were 0.037–0.106 ng/mL. In-hospital case fatality rate was 10.4% (37/357 patients). The prevalence of in-hospital non-lethal cardiovascular complications is represented in Table 2. After 3 years of follow-up, we collected data from 87.8% (281/320) discharged patients. Follow-up was conducted by a telephone-based interview. Cardiovascular death, recurrent MI, stroke, hospital admission due to unstable angina, and acute decompensated heart failure were considered as an adverse cardiovascular outcome, or the study endpoints. The prevalence of the study endpoints is represented in Table 3.
Table 2

In-hospital non-lethal cardiovascular complications, n = 357

ComplicationValue
Early postinfarction angina, n (%)50 (14.0)
Recurrent myocardial infarction, n (%)18 (5.0)
Stroke, n (%)2 (0.6)
Arrhythmia or heart block, n (%)96 (26.9)
Any non-lethal cardiovascular complications, n (%)166 (46.5)
Table 3

Study endpoints after 3 years of follow-up, n = 281

Study endpointValue
Cardiovascular death, n (%)43 (15.3)
Recurrent myocardial infarction, n (%)40 (14.2)
Stroke, n (%)12 (4.3)
Hospital admission due to unstable angina, n (%)81 (28.8)
Acute decompensated heart failure, n (%)23 (8.2)
Combined endpoint, n (%)199 (70.8)
In-hospital non-lethal cardiovascular complications, n = 357 Study endpoints after 3 years of follow-up, n = 281 Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc (MedCalc Software) and SPSS (IBM). A sampling distribution was assessed by D’Agostino-Pearson test. Descriptive data were represented by median, interquartile range (25th and 75th percentiles), mean, and standard deviation of the mean. Two independent groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test. An adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed using false discovery rate (FDR). P-values, or q-values if FDR was applied (q-values are the name given to the adjusted p-values found using an optimized FDR approach), ≤ 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. For multivariate analysis, we performed a stepwise linear logistic regression using forward Wald method with the plotting of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and further calculation of the area under the curve (AUC). Cut-off levels for sCC and sNGAL were defined according to the linear logistic regression to determine the optimal predictive values but were not linked to GFR.

Results

At hospital admission, all the patients were divided into two groups, with (n = 104, 29.1%) and without (n = 253, 70.9%) RD. The same stratification was carried out before hospital discharge [n = 86 (24.1%) and n = 271 (75.9%) patients with and without RD, respectively]. Medians of sCC and sNGAL levels on the 1st day after hospital admission were 1.21 (0.89–1.63) mg/L and 1.33 (0.36–1.91) ng/mL, respectively. Medians of sCC and sNGAL levels on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission were 1.50 (1.02–1.90) mg/L and 1.63 (1.25–2.62) ng/mL, respectively. Patients with RD at hospital admission had significantly higher levels of sCC on the 1st and 12th-14th day after hospital admission [1.76 (1.06–1.96) and 1.75 (1.15–2.16) mg/L, respectively) compared to those without RD [1.16 (0.86–1.34) and 1.31 (0.95–1.66) mg/L], p = 0.037 and 0.001, respectively (Table 4). Patients with RD at hospital discharge had significantly higher levels of sCC [1.74 (1.29–2.17) mg/L] and sNGAL [1.93 (1.55–2.52) ng/mL] on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission in comparison with those without RD [1.41 (0.96–1.7) mg/L and 1.53 (1.18–2.62) ng/mL], p = 0.024 and 0.031, respectively (Table 5). Regarding all other comparisons, we did not find any significant differences.
Table 4

Concentrations of serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with and without renal dysfunction at hospital admission, n = 357

FeatureRenal dysfunction at hospital admission, n = 104No renal dysfunction at hospital admission, n = 253 P value
Serum cystatin C on the 1st day after hospital admission, mg/L1.76 (1.06–1.96)1.16 (0.86–1.34)0.037
Serum cystatin C on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, mg/L1.75 (1.15–2.16)1.31 (0.95–1.66)0.001
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin on the 1st day after hospital admission, ng/mL1.41 (1.01–1.82)1.36 (1.08–1.64)0.95
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, ng/mL1.78 (1.43–2.12)1.85 (1.65–2.06)0.68
Table 5

Concentrations of serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with and without renal dysfunction before hospital discharge, n = 357

FeatureRenal dysfunction before hospital discharge, n = 86No renal dysfunction before hospital discharge, n = 271 P value
Serum cystatin C on the 1st day after hospital admission, mg/L1.27 (1.04–1.69)1.12 (0.95–1.4)0.14
Serum cystatin C on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, mg/L1.74 (1.29–2.17)1.41 (0.96–1.7)0.024
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin on the 1st day after hospital admission, ng/mL1.42 (1.05–2.28)1.23 (0.2–1.76)0.06
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, ng/mL1.93 (1.55–2.52)1.53 (1.18–2.62)0.031
Concentrations of serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with and without renal dysfunction at hospital admission, n = 357 Concentrations of serum cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in patients with and without renal dysfunction before hospital discharge, n = 357 An increased level of sNGAL on the 1st day after admission was significantly associated with in-hospital non-lethal cardiovascular complications [1.42 (1.17–2.27) and 1.20 (0.20–1.86) ng/mL in patients with and without them, respectively, p = 0.019]. Moreover, a higher level of sNGAL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission was significantly associated with a cardiovascular death after 3 years of follow-up (Fig. 1). In addition, elevated concentrations of sCC and sNGAL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission were significantly associated with a combined endpoint (Figs. 1 and 2). Notably, 132 patients had a level of sNGAL ≥ 1.25 ng/mL at hospital discharge that could possibly point on an infection [9]; however, none of them had signs or symptoms of any infectious disease both at hospital admission and hospital discharge. Nevertheless, we did not perform a specialized screening for latent infections.
Fig. 1

Medians of sNGAL levels on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission depending on cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up

Fig. 2

Medians of sCC levels on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission depending on cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up; the Y axis is cut from 0 to 1.46 for the better visualization of the results

Medians of sNGAL levels on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission depending on cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up Medians of sCC levels on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission depending on cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up; the Y axis is cut from 0 to 1.46 for the better visualization of the results For the determination of the independent factors of an adverse cardiovascular outcome, we performed a stepwise linear logistic regression. Factors included into regression were age, gender, past medical history of MI or stroke, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, smoking, Killip class of acute heart failure at hospital admission, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), localization of MI, number of affected coronary arteries, polyvascular disease, myocardial revascularization, sCC or sNGAL level on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, and RD before hospital discharge. We identified anterior MI, LVEF < 40%, 3 affected coronary arteries, past medical history of stroke, level of sCC ≥ 1.9 mg/L on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, level of sNGAL ≥ 1.25 ng/mL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, and RD before hospital discharge as the factors significantly associated with an adverse cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up (Table 6). Performance of PCI was associated with a significant decrease in risk of an adverse cardiovascular outcome (Table 6).
Table 6

Independent predictors of an adverse cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up

Predictor P valueOdds ratio95% confidence interval
Lower boundUpper bound
Anterior localization of myocardial infarction0.0092.31.24.1
Left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%0.0013.61.77.6
Three affected coronary arteries0.0222.01.13.7
Past medical history of stroke0.0011.61.22.2
Level of serum cystatin C on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission ≥ 1.9 mg/L0.0041.91.22.9
Level of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission ≥ 1.25 ng/mL0.0032.91.46.0
Renal dysfunction before hospital discharge0.0011.61.22.2
Percutaneous coronary intervention0.0010.40.30.7
Independent predictors of an adverse cardiovascular outcome after 3 years of follow-up Finally, we compared AUC of the models based on RD before hospital discharge, level of sCC ≥ 1.9 mg/L, and level of sNGAL ≥ 1.25 ng/mL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission. The latter model had the highest predictive value (AUC = 0.78) whilst two other models had equally lower predictive value (AUC = 0.70, Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Comparison of the predictive value of the models based on different markers of renal dysfunction regarding adverse cardiovascular outcome

Comparison of the predictive value of the models based on different markers of renal dysfunction regarding adverse cardiovascular outcome

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the value of sCC and sNGAL level in prediction of an adverse cardiovascular outcome after STEMI. While sCC is a well-established marker of GFR [22, 23], sNGAL is mainly a neutrophil biomarker related to the bacterial infections; however, a number of studies also demonstrated an increase in sNGAL as a response to renal tubular damage [24-26]. Despite sNGAL is not well-recognized GFR marker compared to sCr and sCC and is not used for the calculation of GFR, sCr, sCC, and sNGAL all being the markers of renal tubular damage can be compared directly to each other for estimating efficiency in prediction of adverse outcome. We previously demonstrated that sCC measured 1 day before and 7 days after CABG surgery is an appropriate predictor of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes [27]. Here we showed that sCC and sNGAL can be potential markers of RD in patients with STEMI if measured on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission. Moreover, the level of sCC ≥ 1.9 mg/L and level of sNGAL ≥ 1.25 ng/mL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission were associated with an adverse cardiovascular outcome in these patients after 3 years of follow-up. Out of three predictive models based on GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, level of sCC ≥ 1.9 mg/L, and level of sNGAL ≥ 1.25 ng/mL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission, the latter had the highest predictive value. This corresponds to the results of Akerblom et al. who identified high level of sCC as an independent predictor of cardiovascular death or MI in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after 1 year of follow-up [28]. In addition, our results are in accordance with the data of Lindberg et al. who detected that high level of sNGAL is an independent predictor of an adverse cardiovascular outcome after 2 years of follow-up in patients with STEMI who underwent PCI [29]. Noteworthy, one of the recent studies demonstrated that a multimarker approach using sCC and a number of other biomarkers added prognostic information to the GRACE risk score in patients with ACS and high risk defined by GRACE, with increasing 6-month mortality in patients with a higher number of elevated biomarkers at hospital admission [30]. In our study, 39 patients were lost to follow-up; however, all of them were alive at that moment. Out of them, 17 (43.6%) patients had major cardiovascular risk factors, i.e., diabetes mellitus, CKD, or arterial hypertension; 15 (38.5%) and 24 (61.5%) respectively had cardiovascular complications and a decrease in GFR during the hospital stay. All these variables were comparable to the general sample; hence, exclusion of the patients lost to follow-up from the statistical analysis was unlikely to affect the results. However, this still can be considered as a study limitation along with a single-center design. Therefore, both sCC and sNGAL have high predictive value for the stratification of cardiovascular risk in patients with STEMI; however, sNGAL has an advantage over sCC.

Conclusion

Patients with STEMI and in-hospital RD have higher levels of sCC and sNGAL compared to those without in-hospital RD. Elevated concentrations of sCC and sNGAL on the 12th-14th day after hospital admission can be suggested as the significant predictors of an adverse cardiovascular outcome in these patients after 3 years of follow-up. The model based on increased level of sNGAL has higher predictive value compared to those based on elevated concentration of sCC and decreased GFR.
  30 in total

1.  ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Lars Rydén; Peter J Grant; Stefan D Anker; Christian Berne; Francesco Cosentino; Nicolas Danchin; Christi Deaton; Javier Escaned; Hans-Peter Hammes; Heikki Huikuri; Michel Marre; Nikolaus Marx; Linda Mellbin; Jan Ostergren; Carlo Patrono; Petar Seferovic; Miguel Sousa Uva; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Michal Tendera; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Paul Valensi; Jose Luis Zamorano; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Guy De Backer; Per Anton Sirnes; Eduardo Alegria Ezquerra; Angelo Avogaro; Lina Badimon; Elena Baranova; Helmut Baumgartner; John Betteridge; Antonio Ceriello; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; Dietrich C Gulba; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; John K Kjekshus; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Eli Lev; Christian Mueller; Ludwig Neyses; Peter M Nilsson; Joep Perk; Piotr Ponikowski; Zeljko Reiner; Naveed Sattar; Volker Schächinger; André Scheen; Henrik Schirmer; Anna Strömberg; Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Juan Luis Tamargo; Margus Viigimaa; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Robert G Xuereb
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  A basic science view of acute kidney injury biomarkers.

Authors:  Jennifer R Charlton; Didier Portilla; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 3.  Cystatin C: an emerging biomarker in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Christos Angelidis; Spyridon Deftereos; Georgios Giannopoulos; Nikolaos Anatoliotakis; Georgios Bouras; Georgios Hatzis; Vasiliki Panagopoulou; Vlasios Pyrgakis; Michael W Cleman
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function.

Authors:  Michael G Shlipak; Kunihiro Matsushita; Johan Ärnlöv; Lesley A Inker; Ronit Katz; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Mark J Sarnak; Brad C Astor; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey; Ron T Gansevoort
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Multimarker approach with cystatin C, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein and red blood cell distribution width in risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Catarina Vieira; Sérgio Nabais; Vítor Ramos; Carlos Braga; António Gaspar; Pedro Azevedo; Miguel Álvares Pereira; Nuno Salomé; Adelino Correia
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 1.374

6.  ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

Authors:  Zeljko Reiner; Alberico L Catapano; Guy De Backer; Ian Graham; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Olov Wiklund; Stefan Agewall; Eduardo Alegria; M John Chapman; Paul Durrington; Serap Erdine; Julian Halcox; Richard Hobbs; John Kjekshus; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Gabriele Riccardi; Robert F Storey; David Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Impact of renal dysfunction on clinical outcome in patients with low risk of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Fa-Po Chung; Tze-Fan Chao; Jo-Nan Liao; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Chern-En Chiang; Shu-Meng Cheng; Wei-Shiang Lin; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Serum and urinary NGAL but not KIM-1 raises in human postrenal AKI.

Authors:  Anja Urbschat; Stefan Gauer; Patrick Paulus; Manuel Reissig; Christine Weipert; Elizabeth Ramos-Lopez; Rainer Hofmann; Peyman Hadji; Helmut Geiger; Nicholas Obermüller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.686

9.  Sequential changes in renal function and the risk of stroke and death in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yutao Guo; Haijun Wang; Xiaoning Zhao; Yu Zhang; Dexian Zhang; Jingling Ma; Yutang Wang; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prognostic value of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and glycosylated hemoglobin for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with single concomitant chronic total occlusion following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Wenhua Peng; Channa Zhang; Zhijun Wang; Wenqi Yang; He Luo; Xiaofeng Li; Dongliang Fu; Changan Yu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Neutrophil degranulation and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Xiahenazi Aiyasiding; Wen-Jing Li; Hai-Han Liao; Qi-Zhu Tang
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.712

3.  Association between Cystatin C and Cardiac Function in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Real-World Analysis.

Authors:  Bowen Lou; Yongbai Luo; Haoxuan Zhang; Haoyu Wu; Gulinigaer Tuerhong Jiang; Hui Liu; Kejia Kan; Xiang Hao; Lizhe Sun; Zuyi Yuan; Jianqing She
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Cristian Stătescu; Larisa Anghel; Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi; Andreea Leonte; Laura-Cătălina Benchea; Radu-Andy Sascău
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Predictive and Prognostic Value of Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jaeho Byeon; Ik Jun Choi; Dongjae Lee; Youngchul Ahn; Mi-Jeong Kim; Doo Soo Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.