Literature DB >> 28297399

A comparative study of automatic image segmentation algorithms for target tracking in MR-IGRT.

Yuan Feng1,2,3, Iwan Kawrakow4, Jeff Olsen2, Parag J Parikh2, Camille Noel2, Omar Wooten2, Dongsu Du2, Sasa Mutic2, Yanle Hu2,5.   

Abstract

On-board magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance during radiation therapy offers the potential for more accurate treatment delivery. To utilize the real-time image information, a crucial prerequisite is the ability to successfully segment and track regions of interest (ROI). The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of different segmentation algorithms using motion images (4 frames per second) acquired using a MR image-guided radiotherapy (MR-IGRT) system. Manual contours of the kidney, bladder, duodenum, and a liver tumor by an experienced radiation oncologist were used as the ground truth for performance evaluation. Besides the manual segmentation, images were automatically segmented using thresholding, fuzzy k-means (FKM), k-harmonic means (KHM), and reaction-diffusion level set evolution (RD-LSE) algorithms, as well as the tissue tracking algorithm provided by the ViewRay treatment planning and delivery system (VR-TPDS). The performance of the five algorithms was evaluated quantitatively by comparing with the manual segmentation using the Dice coefficient and target registration error (TRE) measured as the distance between the centroid of the manual ROI and the centroid of the automatically segmented ROI. All methods were able to successfully segment the bladder and the kidney, but only FKM, KHM, and VR-TPDS were able to segment the liver tumor and the duodenum. The performance of the thresholding, FKM, KHM, and RD-LSE algorithms degraded as the local image contrast decreased, whereas the performance of the VP-TPDS method was nearly independent of local image contrast due to the reference registration algorithm. For segmenting high-contrast images (i.e., kidney), the thresholding method provided the best speed (<1 ms) with a satisfying accuracy (Dice=0.95). When the image contrast was low, the VR-TPDS method had the best automatic contour. Results suggest an image quality determination procedure before segmentation and a combination of different methods for optimal segmentation with the on-board MR-IGRT system. PACS number(s): 87.57.nm, 87.57.N-, 87.61.Tg.
© 2016 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; image segmentation; image-guided radiotherapy; motion images

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28297399      PMCID: PMC5875567          DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i2.5820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  31 in total

1.  STACS: new active contour scheme for cardiac MR image segmentation.

Authors:  Chamchai Pluempitiwiriyawej; José M F Moura; Yi-Jen Lin Wu; Chien Ho
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Atlas renormalization for improved brain MR image segmentation across scanner platforms.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Contour based respiratory motion analysis for free breathing CT.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Tingliang Zhuang; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Comparison of liver tumor motion with and without abdominal compression using cine-magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Cynthia L Eccles; Ritesh Patel; Anna K Simeonov; Gina Lockwood; Masoom Haider; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A direct morphometric comparison of five labeling protocols for multi-atlas driven automatic segmentation of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sean M Nestor; Erin Gibson; Fu-Qiang Gao; Alex Kiss; Sandra E Black
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The Australian magnetic resonance imaging-linac program.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Michael Barton; Stuart Crozier
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Comparative assessment of segmentation algorithms for tumor delineation on a test-retest [(11)C]choline dataset.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Tony Shepherd; Federico Turkheimer; Dimitris Visvikis; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Twyla R Willoughby; Patrick A Kupelian; Jean Pouliot; Katsuto Shinohara; Michelle Aubin; Mack Roach; Lisa L Skrumeda; James M Balter; Dale W Litzenberg; Scott W Hadley; John T Wei; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Markerless EPID image guided dynamic multi-leaf collimator tracking for lung tumors.

Authors:  J Rottmann; P Keall; R Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition.

Authors:  J C Bezdek; L O Hall; L P Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.