Literature DB >> 28296814

Pedicle Screw Safety: How Much Anterior Breach Is Safe?: A Cadaveric and CT-Based Study.

Vishal Sarwahi1, Monica Payares, Stephen Wendolowski, Rachel Gecelter, Kathleen Maguire, Dan Wang, Beverly Thornhill, Terry Amaral.   

Abstract

MINI: The objective of this study was to determine the safety limits of anterior/anterolateral pedicle screw breaches. Through clinical and cadaveric study, it appears that less than 4 mm of breach has a significantly lower likelihood of impingement on vital structures (P < 0.001). STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical retrospective chart review and basic science study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety limits of an anterior/anterorolateral misplaced pedicle screw on computed tomography (CT) scan in spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the limits of medial breaches (<4 mm) are known, the safe limits for anterior/anterolateral breaches in spine deformity are not yet defined.
METHODS: The present study had two parts. In part I, postoperative CT scans of 165 patients operated on for spine deformity were reviewed for screw misplacement (2800 screws). The amount of anterior/anterolateral breach was measured. Protrusions were also evaluated for proximity to vital structures. All scans were reviewed by musculoskeletal radiologist. In part II, eight cadavers were instrumented with 6 × 30 and 6 × 40 mm bilaterally from T1-S1. Screws were randomly inserted under navigation guidance either "IN" or "OUT-anterior/lateral." CT scan was performed, followed by gross dissection to determine screw position.
RESULTS: Part I: 116(4.2%) screws were misplaced anterior/anterolaterally. Thirty-one (26.7%) were adjacent to vital structures. Fisher exact test showed 4 mm or less breach has significantly lower likelihood of impingement (P < 0.001). Screws adjacent/impinging the aorta protruded an average 5.7 ± 0.6 mm, whereas screws not involving the aorta breached an average 3.9 ± 0.2 mm, (P < 0.001). Part II: 285 screws were inserted. On CT scan, 125 were misplaced anterior/anterolaterally. On gross dissection, 89 were visibly misplaced; 23 were covered entirely by soft tissue but were palpable; and 13 were contained in bone. All 23 screws did not endanger any structures and protruded less than 4 mm on CT scan.
CONCLUSION: Anterior/anterolateral breaches of 4 mm or less on CT poses no significant risk of impingement and therefore can be considered safe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28296814     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Is the Implant in Bone? The Accuracy of CT and Fluoroscopic Imaging for Detecting Malpositioned Pelvic Screw and SI Fusion Implants.

Authors:  Jose E San Miguel-Ruiz; David Polly; Melissa Albersheim; Jonathan Sembrano; Takashi Takahashi; Paul Lender; Christopher T Martin
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

2.  Three-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws in L4-L5-S1 fixation: single-centre experience of pedicular accuracy and S1 cortical fixation of 810 screws.

Authors:  Manuel García-Fantini; Ricardo De Casas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  Utilization of the 3D-printed spine model for freehand pedicle screw placement in complex spinal deformity correction.

Authors:  Lee A Tan; Ketan Yerneni; Alexander Tuchman; Xudong J Li; Meghan Cerpa; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery.

Authors:  Arnold B Vardiman; David J Wallace; Neil R Crawford; Jessica R Riggleman; Leigh A Ahrendtsen; Charles G Ledonio
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-07-19

5.  How to improve the safety of bicortical pedicle screw insertion in the thoracolumbar vertebrae: analysis base on three-dimensional CT reconstruction of patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Qingxian Hou; Yanchen Chu; Xiuling Huang; Wenjiu Yang; Jinglong Ma; Zhijie Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Perspective on the integration of optical sensing into orthopedic surgical devices.

Authors:  Carl Fisher; James Harty; Albert Yee; Celina L Li; Katarzyna Komolibus; Konstantin Grygoryev; Huihui Lu; Ray Burke; Brian C Wilson; Stefan Andersson-Engels
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.758

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.