| Literature DB >> 28296025 |
Martine M A Beeftink1, Wilko Spiering2, Mark R De Jong3, Pieter A Doevendans1, Peter J Blankestijn4, Arif Elvan3, Jan-Evert Heeg5, Michiel L Bots6, Michiel Voskuil1.
Abstract
Renal denervation may be more effective if performed distal in the renal artery because of smaller distances between the lumen and perivascular nerves. The authors reviewed the angiographic results of 97 patients and compared blood pressure reduction in relation to the location of the denervation. No significant differences in blood pressure reduction or complications were found between patient groups divided according to their spatial distribution of the ablations (proximal to the bifurcation in both arteries, distal to the bifurcation in one artery and distal in the other artery, or distal to the bifurcation in both arteries), but systolic ambulatory blood pressure reduction was significantly related to the number of distal ablations. No differences in adverse events were observed. In conclusion, we found no reason to believe that renal denervation distal to the bifurcation poses additional risks over the currently advised approach of proximal denervation, but improved efficacy remains to be conclusively established. ©2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Entities:
Keywords: hypertension-general; optimized treatment; renal denervation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28296025 PMCID: PMC8030832 DOI: 10.1111/jch.12989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ISSN: 1524-6175 Impact factor: 3.738