Literature DB >> 28295167

Poorer detection rates of severe fetal growth restriction in women of likely refugee background: A case for re-focusing pregnancy care.

Mary Anne Biro1, Christine East1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (< third centile) in a singleton pregnancy undelivered by 40 weeks is one of a number of Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators, which aim to provide a measure of the quality and safety of maternity care. Women of refugee background have been found to have poorer perinatal outcomes compared to others and these outcomes can in part be explained by previous history. However, less access to and engagement with pregnancy care may also be contributing factors. This study examined the impact of likely refugee background on severe FGR in a singleton pregnancy undelivered by 40 weeks.
METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken utilising data on women who gave birth to a severely growth-restricted infant at Monash Health during January 2013-July 2015. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were undertaken to examine the association between the mother being of likely refugee background and severe FGR in singletons delivered after 40 weeks.
RESULTS: There was an association between the mother being of likely refugee background and giving birth to a severely growth-restricted baby after 40 weeks with these mothers at two and half times the odds compared to mothers of non-refugee background (adjusted odds ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.44-4.42).
CONCLUSIONS: While detecting FGR is clinically challenging, our findings suggest that maternity services need to be supported to offer care tailored to the specific needs of vulnerable and disadvantaged populations. Providing quality, culturally responsive and accessible care is fundamental to addressing refugee maternal and perinatal health inequalities.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal growth restriction; pregnancy care; refugee

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28295167     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

1.  "In Africa, There Was No Family Planning. Every Year You Just Give Birth": Family Planning Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Somali and Congolese Refugee Women After Resettlement to the United States.

Authors:  Pamela A Royer; Lenora M Olson; Brandi Jackson; Lana S Weber; Lori Gawron; Jessica N Sanders; David K Turok
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2019-07-26

Review 2.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and International Immigration Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samira Behboudi-Gandevani; Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi; Mohammad Hossein Panahi; Abbas Mardani; Piret Paal; Christina Prinds; Mojtaba Vaismoradi
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.640

3.  Bibliometric analysis of global migration health research in peer-reviewed literature (2000-2016).

Authors:  Waleed M Sweileh; Kolitha Wickramage; Kevin Pottie; Charles Hui; Bayard Roberts; Ansam F Sawalha; Saed H Zyoud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Sergio A Silverio; James Harris; Angela Harden; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.372

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.