Literature DB >> 28295165

Declining invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: A comparison of tertiary hospital and national data from 2012 to 2015.

Kristine Johnson1, Joanne Kelley2, Virginia Saxton3, Susan P Walker2,4, Lisa Hui2,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the superior accuracy of maternal plasma cell-free DNA-based prenatal screening has resulted in >50% national decline in amniocenteses and chorionic villus sampling (CVS), creating new implications for specialist training.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the annual figures on amniocenteses and CVS in a tertiary hospital with national population-based trends between 2012 and 2015.
METHODS: Retrospective study examining the amniocentesis and CVS procedures performed in a tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2015. Numbers of procedures, indications for testing, type of test and diagnostic results were analysed. Trends in the annual numbers of procedures were compared to national population-based data from Medicare Benefits Schedule database.
RESULTS: The annual numbers of diagnostic procedures in our tertiary centre fell from 267 to 215 over the study period, representing a 19.5% decline. This was significantly smaller than the corresponding national decline of 53.7% for the same period (P < 0.0001). In 2015, ultrasound abnormality (including nuchal translucency ≥ 3.5 mm) surpassed high-risk screening results as the most common indication for invasive testing. Thirty percent of procedures performed for an ultrasound abnormality occurred prior to 18 weeks gestation.
CONCLUSION: Our tertiary centre experienced a relatively smaller decline in prenatal diagnostic procedures compared with national figures, largely due to an increase in testing for ultrasound abnormalities. Our results demonstrate the increasing contribution of first trimester ultrasound in the detection of fetal abnormalities in the cell-free DNA era and the continued viability of specialist training in invasive procedures.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amniocentesis; chorionic villus sampling; karyotype; noninvasive prenatal testing; prenatal diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28295165     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  3 in total

1.  Array study in fetuses with nuchal translucency above the 95th percentile: a 4-year observational single-centre study.

Authors:  Edgar Coello-Cahuao; María Ángeles Sánchez-Durán; Inés Calero; María Teresa Higueras; Mayte Avilés García; Carlota Rodó; Nerea Maiz; Alberto Plaja Rustein; Neus Castells-Sarret; Carmen Mediano-Vizuete; Elena Carreras
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  In-house genetic counseling increases the detection of abnormal karyotypes-a 26-year experience in prenatal diagnosis in a single tertiary referral hospital in Poland.

Authors:  Julia Bijok; Anna Kucińska-Chahwan; Diana Massalska; Alicja Ilnicka; Grzegorz Panek; Tomasz Roszkowski
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Pawel Sadlecki; Marek Grabiec; Pawel Walentowicz; Malgorzata Walentowicz-Sadlecka
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.