Literature DB >> 28295031

X-linkage is not a general inhibitor of tissue-specific gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

E Argyridou1, A K Huylmans1, A Königer1, J Parsch1.   

Abstract

As a consequence of its difference in copy number between males and females, the X chromosome is subject to unique evolutionary forces and gene regulatory mechanisms. Previous studies of Drosophila melanogaster have shown that the expression of X-linked, testis-specific reporter genes is suppressed in the male germline. However, it is not known whether this phenomenon is restricted to testis-expressed genes or if it is a more general property of genes with tissue-specific expression, which are also underrepresented on the X chromosome. To test this, we compared the expression of three tissue-specific reporter genes (ovary, accessory gland and Malpighian tubule) inserted at various autosomal and X-chromosomal locations. In contrast to testis-specific reporter genes, we found no reduction of X-linked expression in any of the other tissues. In accessory gland and Malpighian tubule, we detected higher expression of the X-linked reporter genes, which suggests that they are at least partially dosage compensated. We found no difference in the tissue-specificity of X-linked and autosomal reporter genes. These findings indicate that, in general, the X chromosome is not a detrimental environment for tissue-specific gene expression and that the suppression of X-linked expression is limited to the male germline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28295031      PMCID: PMC5520135          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2017.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  28 in total

Review 1.  Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Sebida: a database for the functional and evolutionary analysis of genes with sex-biased expression.

Authors:  Florian Gnad; John Parsch
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Transgene Coplacement and high efficiency site-specific recombination with the Cre/loxP system in Drosophila.

Authors:  M L Siegal; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Two tightly-linked Drosophila male accessory gland transcripts with the same developmental expression derive from independent transcription units.

Authors:  M Park; S A Monsma; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes.

Authors:  Hugo J Bellen; Robert W Levis; Guochun Liao; Yuchun He; Joseph W Carlson; Garson Tsang; Martha Evans-Holm; P Robin Hiesinger; Karen L Schulze; Gerald M Rubin; Roger A Hoskins; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Dosage Compensation and the Distribution of Sex-Biased Gene Expression in Drosophila: Considerations and Genomic Constraints.

Authors:  Miguel Gallach; Esther Betrán
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Sex Chromosome-wide Transcriptional Suppression and Compensatory Cis-Regulatory Evolution Mediate Gene Expression in the Drosophila Male Germline.

Authors:  Emily L Landeen; Christina A Muirhead; Lori Wright; Colin D Meiklejohn; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Maria D Vibranovski
Journal:  J Genomics       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 10.  Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease.

Authors:  Venkateswara R Chintapalli; Jing Wang; Julian A T Dow
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  A putative de novo evolved gene required for spermatid chromatin condensation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Emily L Rivard; Andrew G Ludwig; Prajal H Patel; Anna Grandchamp; Sarah E Arnold; Alina Berger; Emilie M Scott; Brendan J Kelly; Grace C Mascha; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Geoffrey D Findlay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.917

2.  Regulation of the X Chromosome in the Germline and Soma of Drosophila melanogaster Males.

Authors:  Eliza Argyridou; John Parsch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Variable dosage compensation is associated with female consequences of an X-linked, male-beneficial mutation.

Authors:  Jack G Rayner; Thomas J Hitchcock; Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel; Danial Asgari; Florencia Schlamp; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.