Literature DB >> 28294944

The computational nature of memory modification.

Samuel J Gershman1, Marie-H Monfils2, Kenneth A Norman3, Yael Niv3.   

Abstract

Retrieving a memory can modify its influence on subsequent behavior. We develop a computational theory of memory modification, according to which modification of a memory trace occurs through classical associative learning, but which memory trace is eligible for modification depends on a structure learning mechanism that discovers the units of association by segmenting the stream of experience into statistically distinct clusters (latent causes). New memories are formed when the structure learning mechanism infers that a new latent cause underlies current sensory observations. By the same token, old memories are modified when old and new sensory observations are inferred to have been generated by the same latent cause. We derive this framework from probabilistic principles, and present a computational implementation. Simulations demonstrate that our model can reproduce the major experimental findings from studies of memory modification in the Pavlovian conditioning literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Pavlovian conditioning; extinction; memory; neuroscience; none; reconsolidation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28294944      PMCID: PMC5391211          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.23763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  161 in total

Review 1.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Mrigankka S Fotedar; Aditya V Datey; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Memory retrieval before or after extinction reduces recovery of fear in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Kathryn D Baker; Gavan P McNally; Rick Richardson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Individual differences in learning predict the return of fear.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Synaptic consolidation: from synapses to behavioral modeling.

Authors:  Lorric Ziegler; Friedemann Zenke; David B Kastner; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exploring a latent cause theory of classical conditioning.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Yael Niv
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery.

Authors:  D C Brooks; M E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1993-01

8.  Post-retrieval extinction training enhances or hinders the extinction of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats dependent on the retrieval-extinction interval.

Authors:  Xiang Ma; Jian-Jun Zhang; Long-Chuan Yu
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Post-retrieval extinction in adolescence prevents return of juvenile fear.

Authors:  Carolyn E Jones; Marie-H Monfils
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Suppression of adult neurogenesis impairs population coding of similar contexts in hippocampal CA3 region.

Authors:  Yosuke Niibori; Tzong-Shiue Yu; Jonathan R Epp; Katherine G Akers; Sheena A Josselyn; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  26 in total

1.  Episodic memory and Pavlovian conditioning: ships passing in the night.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Marijn C W Kroes
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-10-11

Review 2.  Learning task-state representations.

Authors:  Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Memory editing from science fiction to clinical practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelps; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  In a Temporally Segmented Experience Hippocampal Neurons Represent Temporally Drifting Context But Not Discrete Segments.

Authors:  John H Bladon; Daniel Joseph Sheehan; Camila S De Freitas; Marc W Howard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  How to never be wrong.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

6.  Shifting from fear to safety through deconditioning-update.

Authors:  Bruno Popik; Felippe Espinelli Amorim; Olavo B Amaral; Lucas De Oliveira Alvares
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Mnemonic prediction errors promote detailed memories.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Natalie A Plotkin; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Does mental context drift or shift?

Authors:  Sarah DuBrow; Nina Rouhani; Yael Niv; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Novelty is not surprise: Human exploratory and adaptive behavior in sequential decision-making.

Authors:  He A Xu; Alireza Modirshanechi; Marco P Lehmann; Wulfram Gerstner; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Adaptive learning is structure learning in time.

Authors:  Linda Q Yu; Robert C Wilson; Matthew R Nassar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 9.052

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.