Literature DB >> 28294168

Assessment of the construct validity of the Australian Health Star Rating: a nutrient profiling diagnostic accuracy study.

S L Cooper1, F E Pelly1, J B Lowe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Nutrient profiling models classify the healthiness of foods based on their nutritional composition and provide the science that underlies nutrition signposting schemes. The two objectives were to examine the construct validity of the Health Star Rating (HSR) system by determining its diagnostic accuracy and to detect the optimal HSR cutoff points to define healthiness in packaged dairy foods. We hypothesised that ultra-processed dairy, defined by NOVA, would have less stars (less healthy) and non-ultra-processed dairy would have more stars (more healthy). SUBJECTS/
METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the HSR system used for 621 dairy foods for sale in an Australian regional supermarket was investigated. The healthiness of packaged dairy was measured using the NOVA food classification system.
RESULTS: The dairy beverages model was found to discriminate between healthy and less healthy dairy beverages as classified by NOVA (AUC: 0.653; 95% CI: 0.556-0.750; P=0.005). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for dairy beverages demonstrated that the optimal cutoff point corresponded to a rating of four stars. There was no discrimination power when using the HSR for predicting the health value of yoghurt and other dairy, or cheeses.
CONCLUSIONS: At the optimal cutoff point of four stars the HSR has a high sensitivity but a low specificity to correctly classify healthy packaged dairy beverages, as defined by NOVA. We provide evidence to support the construct validity of the HSR model for dairy beverages, but not for the models used for yoghurts and other dairy products, or cheeses.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28294168     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  25 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap.

Authors:  E Labouze; C Goffi; L Moulay; V Azaïs-Braesco
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 3.  Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Monteiro; Geoffrey Cannon; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins; Carla Adriano Martins; Josefa Garzillo; Daniela Silva Canella; Larissa Galastri Baraldi; Maluh Barciotte; Maria Laura da Costa Louzada; Renata Bertazzi Levy; Rafael Moreira Claro; Patrícia Constante Jaime
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Moubarac; M Batal; M L Louzada; E Martinez Steele; C A Monteiro
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christina A Roberto; Marie A Bragg; Marlene B Schwartz; Marissa J Seamans; Aviva Musicus; Nicole Novak; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Application of the British Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system in a French food composition database.

Authors:  Chantal Julia; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Mathilde Touvier; Caroline Méjean; Léopold Fezeu; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Performance characteristics of NuVal and the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI).

Authors:  David L Katz; Valentine Y Njike; Lauren Q Rhee; Arthur Reingold; Keith T Ayoob
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children's lipid profiles: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  F Rauber; P D B Campagnolo; D J Hoffman; M R Vitolo
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.222

9.  Development and validation of the nutrient-rich foods index: a tool to measure nutritional quality of foods.

Authors:  Victor L Fulgoni; Debra R Keast; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Laura da Costa Louzada; Ana Paula Bortoletto Martins; Daniela Silva Canella; Larissa Galastri Baraldi; Renata Bertazzi Levy; Rafael Moreira Claro; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Geoffrey Cannon; Carlos Augusto Monteiro
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.106

View more
  5 in total

1.  Balanced Hybrid Nutrient Density Score Compared to Nutri-Score and Health Star Rating Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analyses.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; Tanhia D Gonzalez; Colin D Rehm
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing.

Authors:  Sarah Dickie; Julie L Woods; Mark Lawrence
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Energy Density of New Food Products Targeted to Children.

Authors:  Danielle J Azzopardi; Kathleen E Lacy; Julie L Woods
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study.

Authors:  Theresa Poon; Marie-Ève Labonté; Christine Mulligan; Mavra Ahmed; Kacie M Dickinson; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective.

Authors:  Claire Elizabeth Pulker; Georgina S A Trapp; Jane Anne Scott; Christina Mary Pollard
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.