| Literature DB >> 28292072 |
Nyambe Sinyange1, Lungowe Sitali2, Choolwe Jacobs2, Patrick Musonda2, Charles Michelo2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In spite of the extreme importance of an early antenatal care visit, more than 50% of Zambian pregnant women book for antenatal care late. We aimed to determine factors associated with late antenatal care booking in Zambia.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; ZDHS; booking; factors; late
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28292072 PMCID: PMC5325499 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.109.6873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Frequency distribution of selected predictor variables of late ANC booking by timing of ANC booking among women aged 15-49 years in Zambia, stratified by rural and urban
| Characteristic | Overall | Rural | Urban | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Early-ANC booking | Late-ANC booking | P-value (chi²) | Early-ANC booking | Late-ANC booking | P-value (chi²) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||||||
| <20 | 47 (14) | 283 (86) | 0.04 | 33 (16) | 179 (84) | 0.47 | 14 (12) | 104 (88) | 0.04 |
| 20-34 | 584 (20) | 2267 (80) | 358 (19) | 1505 (81) | 226 (23) | 762 (77) | |||
| 35-49 | 150 (19) | 653 (81) | 108 (18) | 486 (82) | 41 (20) | 167 (80) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| No education | 103 (21) | 397 (79) | <0.01 | 97 (21) | 356 (79) | <0.01 | 6 (13) | 41 (87) | <0.01 |
| Primary | 430 (18) | 2001 (82) | 331 (18) | 1503 (82) | 99 (17) | 498 (83) | |||
| Secondary | 200 (22) | 728 (78) | 65 (17) | 310 (83) | 135 (24) | 418 (76) | |||
| Higher | 48 (38) | 76 (62) | 6 (75) | 2 (25) | 42 (36) | 74 (63) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Wanted then | 464 (22) | 1657 (78) | 0.01 | 306 (20) | 1185 (80) | 0.03 | 158 (25) | 472 (75) | 0.02 |
| Wanted later | 184 (17) | 908 (83) | 115 (17) | 577 (83) | 69 (17) | 331 (82) | |||
| Wanted no more | 133 (17) | 638 (83) | 78 (16) | 409 (84) | 55 (19) | 229 (81) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Yes | 235 (16) | 1156 (83) | <0.01 | 186 (17) | 877 (83) | 0.25 | 49 (15) | 279 (85) | <0.01 |
| No | 547 (21) | 2047 (79) | 314 (19) | 1296 (81) | 233 (24) | 751 (76) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Yes | 457 (21) | 1756 (79) | 0.13 | 326 (20) | 1292 (80) | 0.04 | 131 (22) | 464 (78) | 0.68 |
| No | 324 (18) | 1447 (82) | 173 (16) | 880 (84) | 151 (21) | 567 (79) | |||
Figure 1Proportions of ANC booking in month’s categories in Zambia
Figure 2Proportions of Late ANC booking by provinces of Zambia
Final model for predictor variables for late ANC booking among women aged 15-49 years in Zambia
| Predictors of late ANC booking | Overall | Rural | Urban | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (%) | AOR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |
|
| ||||||
| Wanted then | 78 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Wanted later | 83 | 1.35 (1.10-1.66) | 1.28 (1.00-1.65) | 0.05 | 1.44 (0.99-2.09) | 0.05 |
| Wanted no more | 83 | 1.27 (1.02-1.59) | 1.31 (0.99-1.74) | 0.05 | 1.17 (0.79-1.72) | 0.42 |
|
| ||||||
| <20 | 86 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 20-34 | 80 | 0.69 (0.50-0.97) | 0.81 (0.53-1.24) | 0.34 | 0.53 (0.31-0.88) | 0.01 |
| 35-49 | 81 | 0.75 (0.53-1.06) | 0.86 (0.56-1.33) | 0.50 | 0.58 (0.32-1.09) | 0.089 |
|
| ||||||
| No education | 79 | 1 | ||||
| Primary | 82 | 1.19 (0.93-1.54) | 1.24 (0.94-1.63) | 0.12 | 0.78 (0.29-2.13) | 0.62 |
| Secondary | 78 | 0.92 (0.68-1.22) | 1.24 (0.86-1.79) | 0.24 | 0.50 (0.18-1.36) | 0.17 |
| Higher | 62 | 0.45 (0.27-0.74) | 0.08 (0.08-0.38) | <0.01 | 0.34 (0.12-0.96) | 0.04 |
|
| ||||||
| Big problem | 83 | 1 | ||||
| Not a big problem | 79 | 0.76 (0.63-0.92) | 0.83(0.65-1.06) | 0.13 | 0.62 (0.47-0.82) | <0.01 |
|
| ||||||
| Big problem | 79 | 1 | ||||
| Not a big problem | 82 | 1.26 (1.03-1.53) | 1.34 (1.05-1.70) | 0.02 | 1.17 (0.84-1.62) | 0.35 |
|
| ||||||
| No | 68 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 81 | 2.16 (1.16-4.03) | 2.39 (1.28-4.45) | <0.01 | n/a | n/a |
AOR= Adjusted Odds Ratio OR= Odds Ratio CI= Confidence Interval
Logistic regression