Literature DB >> 18639909

Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England.

R E Rowe1, H Magee, M A Quigley, P Heron, J Askham, P Brocklehurst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evidence about sociodemographic factors associated with late attendance for antenatal care in the UK is of poor quality. This study aimed to identify any social or ethnic differences in access to antenatal care, and to quantify the effect of any such differences using data collected in a survey of women's experiences of antenatal screening. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using a postal questionnaire.
METHODS: A stratified clustered random sampling strategy was used. Hospitals in England were stratified according to ethnic mix. In order to ensure inclusion of an adequate number of women from Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) backgrounds, hospitals with >or= 15% of women of BME origin were oversampled. Pregnant women aged >or= 16 years, receiving care in 15 participating hospitals, were sent a postal questionnaire at 27-31 weeks of gestation. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) comparing social and ethnic groups for attendance for antenatal care, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.
RESULTS: In total, 839 women (57%) returned completed questionnaires. Compared with all women giving birth in 2005 in England and Wales, the survey sample contained fewer women aged <20 years (5.8% vs 6.9%), more women aged >35 years (24.1% vs 19.6%) and fewer women who were born outside the UK (14.8% vs 20.8%). Five percent of responders were late attenders for their first antenatal appointment. The odds of late initiation of antenatal care were higher for women born outside the UK [OR 4.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.25-8.52; P=0.0004] and for women living without a husband/partner (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.81-4.16; P=0.0002). In total, 2.5% of women were late attenders for their booking appointment. The odds of late booking were higher for Black women (OR 5.92, 95% CI 2.97-11.83) and women living without a husband/partner (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.97-3.93; P=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of women initiate and/or book late for antenatal care. This study provides recent, good-quality evidence that women born outside the UK and those living without a husband/partner may be at particular risk of late attendance for antenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639909     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  34 in total

Review 1.  Migrant women's utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Heaman; H Bayrampour; D Kingston; B Blondel; M Gissler; C Roth; S Alexander; A Gagnon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

3.  Individual and Area Level Factors Associated with Prenatal, Delivery, and Postnatal Care in Pakistan.

Authors:  Henna Budhwani; Kristine Ria Hearld; Hanne Harbison
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

4.  "It's a life you're playing with": A qualitative study on experiences of NHS maternity services among undocumented migrant women in England.

Authors:  Laura B Nellums; Jaynaide Powis; Lucy Jones; Anna Miller; Kieran Rustage; Neal Russell; Jon S Friedland; Sally Hargreaves
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Reasons given by pregnant women for late initiation of antenatal care in the niger delta, Nigeria.

Authors:  P N Ebeigbe; E P Ndidi; G O Igberase; I G Oseremen
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2010-06

6.  Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system.

Authors:  Georgina Sutherland; Jane Yelland; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

7.  Differences in timely antenatal care between first and second-generation migrants in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anushka A Choté; Gerrit T Koopmans; Christianne J M de Groot; Renske J Hoefman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Eric A P Steegers; Johan P Mackenbach; Margo Trappenburg; Marleen Foets
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

8.  Current status of antenatal care of pregnant women-8 provinces in China, 2018.

Authors:  Wenling Hu; Huanqing Hu; Wei Zhao; Aiqun Huang; Qi Yang; Jiangli Di
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK.

Authors:  Jenny A Cresswell; Ge Yu; Bethan Hatherall; Joanne Morris; Farah Jamal; Angela Harden; Adrian Renton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  The utilization of antenatal care among rural-to-urban migrant women in Shanghai: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Zhihuan Jennifer Huang; Sijia Yang; Jie Pan; Brian Smith; Biao Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.