Literature DB >> 28289758

Changes in university orthodontic care over a period of 20 years : Patient characteristics, treatment quality, and treatment costs.

Julia von Bremen1, Eva Maria Streckbein2, Sabine Ruf3.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to analyze whether there were changes in the severity of malocclusions of patients treated at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany over a period of 20 years (1992-2012) and if the implementation of the KIG system (German index of treatment need) in 2001 had any effect on the patient cohort. Furthermore, the study aimed to analyze the influence of the severity of malocclusion on treatment quality and economic efficiency (relation payment per case/treatment effort).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The files of all 5385 patients admitted to the orthodontic department between 1992 and 2012 were screened and the following information was recorded: patient characteristics, treatment duration, KIG, treatment outcome, and costs.
RESULTS: In the KIG period, patients were older, pretreatment malocclusions were more severe, treatment took longer, required more appointments, and did not achieve the same degree of perfection as in the pre-KIG period. Patients with a higher pretreatment KIG category had longer treatments and did not achieve the same degree of perfection as patients with lower KIG categories. Although total payment was slightly higher for the more severe cases, their cost-per-appointment ratio was significantly lower.
CONCLUSION: In the present university department, a shift of the orthodontic care task towards more complex cases has occurred over the last 20 years. Generally the quality of orthodontic treatment was good, but it has been demonstrated that the higher KIG cases did not end up at the same level of excellence as the lower KIG cases. Furthermore, KIG 5 patients had a longer treatment duration, and required more appointments than lower KIG cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KIG system; Reimbursement; Treatment costs; Treatment quality; University orthodontic care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28289758     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-017-0088-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  27 in total

1.  Total inpatient treatment costs in patients with severe burns: towards a more accurate reimbursement model.

Authors:  Tarun Mehra; Virve Koljonen; Burkhardt Seifert; Jörk Volbracht; Pietro Giovanoli; Jan Plock; Rudolf Maria Moos
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.193

2.  Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective grading system, and comprehensive clinical assessment.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Tadashi Honjo; Tomohiro Fukunaga; Shouichi Miyawaki; W Eugene Roberts; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Mavreas; Athanasios E Athanasiou
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results over a ten-year period].

Authors:  J Ahlgren
Journal:  Tandlakartidningen       Date:  1988-03-01

5.  An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  F R Beckwith; R J Ackerman; C M Cobb; D E Tira
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  A Comparison of Costs Between Medical and Surgical Patients in an Academic Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Benson S Hsu; Thomas B Brazelton
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2015-12

7.  Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration.

Authors:  Monica A Fisher; Reid M Wenger; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.

Authors:  Charee L Campbell; W Eugene Roberts; James K Hartsfield; Rong Qi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  [The suitability of orthodontical groups of indications (OGI) for preventive dental examinations of the public health service].

Authors:  I Gottstein; A Borutta
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2007-10

10.  Prevalence and development of KIG-relevant symptoms in primary school students from Frankfurt am Main.

Authors:  Bettina Glasl; Björn Ludwig; Peter Schopf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.938

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.

Authors:  I Graf; N C Bock; T Bartzela; V Röper; U Schumann; K Reck; H Christ; K Höfer; U Fritz; D Wiechmann; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; M Wolf; S Ruf; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.341

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.