Jonathan Penm1,2, Neil J MacKinnon3, Stephen M Strakowski4, Jun Ying5, Michelle M Doty6. 1. James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio jonathan.penm@sydney.edu.au. 2. Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. 3. James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas. 5. College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 6. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, New York.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Care coordination has been identified as a key strategy in improving the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the US health care system. Our objective was to determine whether population or health care system issues are associated with primary care coordination gaps in the United States and other high-income countries. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2013 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy (IHP) survey with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Respondents were adult primary care patients from 11 countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States. Poor primary care coordination was defined as participants reporting at least 3 gaps in the coordination of care out of a maximum of 5. RESULTS: Analyses were based on 13,958 respondents. The rate of poor primary care coordination was 5.2% (724/13,958 respondents) overall and highest in the United States, at 9.8% (137/1,395 respondents). Multivariate regression analysis among all respondents found that they were less likely to experience poor primary care coordination if their primary care physician often or always knew their medical history, spent sufficient time, involved them, and explained things well (odds ratio = 0.6 for each). Poor primary care coordination was more likely to occur among patients with chronic conditions (odds ratios = 1.4-2.1 depending on number) and patients younger than 65 years (odds ratios = 1.6-2.3 depending on age-group). Among US respondents, insurance status, health status, household income, and sex were not associated with poor primary care coordination. CONCLUSIONS: The United States had the highest rate of poor primary care coordination among the 11 high-income countries evaluated. An established relationship with a primary care physician was significantly associated with better care coordination, whereas being chronically ill or younger was associated with poorer care coordination.
PURPOSE: Care coordination has been identified as a key strategy in improving the effectiveness, safety, and efficiency of the US health care system. Our objective was to determine whether population or health care system issues are associated with primary care coordination gaps in the United States and other high-income countries. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2013 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy (IHP) survey with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Respondents were adult primary care patients from 11 countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States. Poor primary care coordination was defined as participants reporting at least 3 gaps in the coordination of care out of a maximum of 5. RESULTS: Analyses were based on 13,958 respondents. The rate of poor primary care coordination was 5.2% (724/13,958 respondents) overall and highest in the United States, at 9.8% (137/1,395 respondents). Multivariate regression analysis among all respondents found that they were less likely to experience poor primary care coordination if their primary care physician often or always knew their medical history, spent sufficient time, involved them, and explained things well (odds ratio = 0.6 for each). Poor primary care coordination was more likely to occur among patients with chronic conditions (odds ratios = 1.4-2.1 depending on number) and patients younger than 65 years (odds ratios = 1.6-2.3 depending on age-group). Among US respondents, insurance status, health status, household income, and sex were not associated with poor primary care coordination. CONCLUSIONS: The United States had the highest rate of poor primary care coordination among the 11 high-income countries evaluated. An established relationship with a primary care physician was significantly associated with better care coordination, whereas being chronically ill or younger was associated with poorer care coordination.
Authors: Dionne Kringos; Wienke Boerma; Yann Bourgueil; Thomas Cartier; Toni Dedeu; Toralf Hasvold; Allen Hutchinson; Margus Lember; Marek Oleszczyk; Danica Rotar Pavlic; Igor Svab; Paolo Tedeschi; Stefan Wilm; Andrew Wilson; Adam Windak; Jouke Van der Zee; Peter Groenewegen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Dana Gelb Safran; Melinda Karp; Kathryn Coltin; Hong Chang; Angela Li; John Ogren; William H Rogers Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ana L Hincapie; Marion Slack; Daniel C Malone; Neil J MacKinnon; Terri L Warholak Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2016 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 0.926
Authors: Román Freixa-Pamias; Pere Blanch Gràcia; Lluïsa Rodriguez Latre; Antoni Oliva Vicedo; Carmen Alonso Permanyer; Pilar Sánchez Chamero; Elisabet Mena Sebastià; Miriam García Bermúdez; Alberto Cabestrero de Diego; Angels González Guardia; Elena Salas González; Carolina Bosch Carabante; José Manuel Depares López; Mireia Sans Corrales; Juan Francisco Pajares Díaz-Meco; Jordi Vericat Garcia; Maria Jesús Megido Badía; Jordi Vilarasau Farre; Maria Rotllan Terradellas; Angel Jover Blanca Journal: Eur Cardiol Date: 2017-12
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Catherine Arsenault; Keely Jordan; Hannah H Leslie; Sanam Roder-DeWan; Olusoji Adeyi; Pierre Barker; Bernadette Daelmans; Svetlana V Doubova; Mike English; Ezequiel García-Elorrio; Frederico Guanais; Oye Gureje; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Lixin Jiang; Edward Kelley; Ephrem Tekle Lemango; Jerker Liljestrand; Address Malata; Tanya Marchant; Malebona Precious Matsoso; John G Meara; Manoj Mohanan; Youssoupha Ndiaye; Ole F Norheim; K Srinath Reddy; Alexander K Rowe; Joshua A Salomon; Gagan Thapa; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Muhammad Pate Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jason A Sharpe; Anne Thackeray; Julie M Fritz; Brook I Martin; John Magel; Megan E Vanneman Journal: Musculoskelet Sci Pract Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Carrie Colla; Wendy Yang; Alexander J Mainor; Ellen Meara; Marietou H Ouayogode; Valerie A Lewis; Stephen Shortell; Elliott Fisher Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Brian E Dixon; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Vivian M Guerrero; Justine May; Nicholas S Koufacos; Andrew M Bean; Joan D Penrod; Cathy C Schubert; Kenneth S Boockvar Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Tejal K Gandhi; Gary S Kaplan; Lucian Leape; Donald M Berwick; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Amy Edmondson; Gregg S Meyer; David Michaels; Julianne M Morath; Charles Vincent; Robert Wachter Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 7.035