Literature DB >> 28288949

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of a Busulfan Test Dose in Adult Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Elizabeth Weil1, Felicia Zook1, Carolyn Oxencis1, Angela Canadeo1, Angela Urmanski2, Mindy Waggoner1, Daniel Eastwood3, Marcelo Pasquini4, Mehdi Hamadani4, Parameswaran Hari5.   

Abstract

Owing to interpatient variability in busulfan exposure, therapeutic monitoring of busulfan is often used in myeloablative allogeneic transplantation to ensure that patients are near the optimal steady-state goal of 900 ng/mL. One challenge in therapeutic monitoring of busulfan is the brief course of busulfan treatment, requiring prompt analysis and dose adjustments as needed. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a busulfan test dose before the start of the conditioning regimen would allow for all conditioning regimen doses to be given at the calculated optimized dose. An observational study was completed to evaluate the effects of a busulfan test dose of 0.9 mg/kg administered before the start of a myeloablative intravenous busulfan-based conditioning regimen. Sixty adult patients who received a busulfan conditioning regimen were reviewed, including 30 patients prior to the implementation of the busulfan test dose (pretest dose group) and 30 patients who received the busulfan test dose (posttest dose group). The primary objective was a pharmacokinetic evaluation of the percentage of patients who achieved the desired steady-state goal using the test dose strategy. The safety and efficacy of the busulfan test dose were evaluated as well. The average busulfan steady-state level after the first dose of the conditioning regimen was significantly lower in the pre-test dose group compared with the post-test dose group (660 ng/mL versus 879.9 ng/mL; P < 0.001). Compared with the post-test dose group, significantly fewer patients in the pre-test dose group were within 10% of the busulfan steady-state goal (10% versus 73.3%; P < 0.001) or within 5% of the goal (0% versus 53%; P < 0.001). Requirements for parenteral nutrition and/or patient-controlled analgesia owing to mucositis and rates of veno-occlusive disease were not significantly different between the pre-test dose group and the post-test dose group. The rates of disease relapse, mortality, and acute graft-versus-host disease were similar in the two groups. A pretransplantation busulfan test dose of 0.9 mg/kg improved the patients' ability to reach therapeutic busulfan target levels after the first conditioning dose and resulted in fewer adjustments during conditioning. The use of a busulfan test dose did not significantly increase patients' risk of mucositis or other safety outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic; Busulfan; Myeloablative; Transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28288949     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  3 in total

Review 1.  Modified diagnostic criteria, grading classification and newly elucidated pathophysiology of hepatic SOS/VOD after haematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cairo; Kenneth R Cooke; Hillard M Lazarus; Nelson Chao
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Test Dose Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Receiving Once-Daily IV Busulfan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Reliable Approach?

Authors:  Kristina M Brooks; Paul Jarosinski; Thomas Hughes; Elizabeth Kang; Nirali N Shah; John B Le Gall; Dennis D Hickstein; Suk See De Ravin; Jomy M George; Parag Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  Risk Score for the Development of Veno-Occlusive Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Authors:  Christopher Strouse; Ying Zhang; Mei-Jie Zhang; Alyssa DiGilio; Marcelo Pasquini; Mary M Horowitz; Stephanie Lee; Vincent Ho; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Wichai Chinratanalab; Alison Loren; Linda J Burns; Andrew Artz; Kathleen F Villa; Wael Saber
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.