Literature DB >> 28288909

Oscillatory EEG dynamics underlying automatic chunking during sentence processing.

Corinna E Bonhage1, Lars Meyer2, Thomas Gruber3, Angela D Friederici2, Jutta L Mueller4.   

Abstract

Sentences are easier to remember than random word sequences, likely because linguistic regularities facilitate chunking of words into meaningful groups. The present electroencephalography study investigated the neural oscillations modulated by this so-called sentence superiority effect during the encoding and maintenance of sentence fragments versus word lists. We hypothesized a chunking-related modulation of neural processing during the encoding and retention of sentences (i.e., sentence fragments) as compared to word lists. Time-frequency analysis revealed a two-fold oscillatory pattern for the memorization of sentences: Sentence encoding was accompanied by higher delta amplitude (4Hz), originating both from regions processing syntax as well as semantics (bilateral superior/middle temporal regions and fusiform gyrus). Subsequent sentence retention was reflected in decreased theta (6Hz) and beta/gamma (27-32Hz) amplitude instead. Notably, whether participants simply read or properly memorized the sentences did not impact chunking-related activity during encoding. Therefore, we argue that the sentence superiority effect is grounded in highly automatized language processing mechanisms, which generate meaningful memory chunks irrespective of task demands.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28288909     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Low-Frequency Oscillations Code Speech during Verbal Working Memory.

Authors:  Johannes Gehrig; Georgios Michalareas; Marie-Therese Forster; Juan Lei; Pavel Hok; Helmut Laufs; Christian Senft; Volker Seifert; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Simon Hanslmayr; Christian A Kell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.

Authors:  Jiawei Li; Bo Hong; Guido Nolte; Andreas K Engel; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.

Authors:  Greta Kaufeld; Hans Rutger Bosker; Sanne Ten Oever; Phillip M Alday; Antje S Meyer; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  EEG theta responses induced by emoji semantic violations.

Authors:  Mengmeng Tang; Xiufeng Zhao; Bingfei Chen; Lun Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading.

Authors:  Yun Wen; Joshua Snell; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-04-18

6.  Acoustically Driven Cortical δ Oscillations Underpin Prosodic Chunking.

Authors:  J M Rimmele; D Poeppel; O Ghitza
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-07-09

7.  Functional brain plasticity during L1 training on complex sentences: Changes in gamma-band oscillatory activity.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Thomas R Knösche; Luyao Chen; Jens Brauer; Angela D Friederici; Burkhard Maess
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences.

Authors:  Matteo Mascelloni; Roberto Zamparelli; Francesco Vespignani; Thomas Gruber; Jutta L Mueller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Sequences of Intonation Units form a ~ 1 Hz rhythm.

Authors:  Maya Inbar; Eitan Grossman; Ayelet N Landau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.

Authors:  Lena Henke; Lars Meyer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.