Literature DB >> 28288774

Intravenous vs. intraosseous access and return of spontaneous circulation during out of hospital cardiac arrest.

Brian Clemency1, Kaori Tanaka2, Paul May3, Johanna Innes4, Sara Zagroba5, Jacqueline Blaszak6, David Hostler7, Derek Cooney8, Kevin McGee9, Heather Lindstrom10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines endorse intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) medication administration for cardiac arrest treatment. Limited clinical evidence supports this recommendation. A multiagency, retrospective study was performed to determine the association between parenteral access type and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in out of hospital cardiac arrest.
METHODS: This was a structured, retrospective chart review of emergency medical services (EMS) records from three agencies. Data was analyzed from adults who suffered OHCA and received epinephrine through EMS established IV or IO access during the 18-month study period. Per regional EMS protocols, choice of parenteral access type was at the provider's discretion. Non-inferiority analysis was performed comparing the association between first access type attempted and ROSC at time of emergency department arrival.
RESULTS: 1310 subjects met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Providers first attempted parenteral access via IV route in 788 (60.15%) subjects. Providers first attempted parenteral access via IO route in 552 (39.85%) subjects. Rates of ROSC at time of ED arrival were 19.67% when IV access was attempted first and 19.92% when IO access was attempted first. An IO first approach was non-inferior to an IV first approach based on the primary end point ROSC at time of emergency department arrival (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: An IO first approach was non-inferior to an IV first approach based on the end point ROSC at time of emergency department arrival.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Emergency medical services; Epinephrine; Intraosseous infusion; Out of hospital cardiac arrest; Vascular access device

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28288774     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  9 in total

1.  [Supraglottic airway devices and intraosseous access in the treatment of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : Do we use the wrong tool too often?]

Authors:  M Christ; K I von Auenmüller; T von den Benken; S Fessaras; W Dierschke; H-J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Proximal tibial dimensions in a formalin-fixed neonatal cadaver sample: an intraosseous infusion approach.

Authors:  Daniël Johannes van Tonder; Martin Louis van Niekerk; Albert van Schoor
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Survival After Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo in Out-of-Hospital Shock-Refractory Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Mohamud R Daya; Brian G Leroux; Paul Dorian; Thomas D Rea; Craig D Newgard; Laurie J Morrison; Joshua R Lupton; James J Menegazzi; Joseph P Ornato; George Sopko; Jim Christenson; Ahamed Idris; Purav Mody; Gary M Vilke; Caroline Herdeman; David Barbic; Peter J Kudenchuk
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Intraosseous Catheter Flow Rates and Ease of Placement at Various Sites in Canine Cadavers.

Authors:  James Lange; Søren R Boysen; Adam Bentley; Aylin Atilla
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-09-19

Review 5.  Skeleton-vasculature chain reaction: a novel insight into the mystery of homeostasis.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Yi Li; Xiang Huang; Ya Gu; Shang Li; Pengbin Yin; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 13.567

6.  Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Hsieh; Meng-Che Wu; Eric H Chou; Chih-Hung Wang; Jon Wolfshohl; James d'Etienne; Chien-Hua Huang; Tsung-Chien Lu; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang; Wen-Jone Chen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Intraosseous fluid resuscitation causes systemic fat emboli in a porcine hemorrhagic shock model.

Authors:  Steinar Kristiansen; Benjamin Storm; Dalia Dahle; Terje Domaas Josefsen; Knut Dybwik; Bent Aksel Nilsen; Erik Waage-Nielsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A network of trans-cortical capillaries as mainstay for blood circulation in long bones.

Authors:  Anika Grüneboom; Ibrahim Hawwari; Daniela Weidner; Stephan Culemann; Sylvia Müller; Sophie Henneberg; Alexandra Brenzel; Simon Merz; Lea Bornemann; Kristina Zec; Manuela Wuelling; Lasse Kling; Mike Hasenberg; Sylvia Voortmann; Stefanie Lang; Wolfgang Baum; Alexandra Ohs; Oliver Kraff; Harald H Quick; Marcus Jäger; Stefan Landgraeber; Marcel Dudda; Renzo Danuser; Jens V Stein; Manfred Rohde; Kolja Gelse; Annette I Garbe; Alexandra Adamczyk; Astrid M Westendorf; Daniel Hoffmann; Silke Christiansen; Daniel Robert Engel; Andrea Vortkamp; Gerhard Krönke; Martin Herrmann; Thomas Kamradt; Georg Schett; Anja Hasenberg; Matthias Gunzer
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2019-01-21

9.  Evaluation of Local Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Emergency Services Response.

Authors:  Kate McKenzie; Saoirse Cameron; Natalya Odoardi; Katelyn Gray; Michael R Miller; Janice A Tijssen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.