Filipa Rijo-Ferreira1,2,3, Daniel Pinto-Neves1, Nuno L Barbosa-Morais1, Joseph S Takahashi2,4, Luisa M Figueiredo1. 1. Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal. 2. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9111, USA. 3. Graduate Program in Areas of Basic and Applied Biology, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal. 4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9111, USA.
Abstract
The Earth's rotation forced life to evolve under cyclic day and night environmental changes. To anticipate such daily cycles, prokaryote and eukaryote free-living organisms evolved intrinsic clocks that regulate physiological and behavioural processes. Daily rhythms have been observed in organisms living within hosts, such as parasites. Whether parasites have intrinsic molecular clocks or whether they simply respond to host rhythmic physiological cues remains unknown. Here, we show that Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of human sleeping sickness, has an intrinsic circadian clock that regulates its metabolism in two different stages of the life cycle. We found that, in vitro, ∼10% of genes in T. brucei are expressed with a circadian rhythm. The maximum expression of these genes occurs at two different phases of the day and may depend on a post-transcriptional mechanism. Circadian genes are enriched in cellular metabolic pathways and coincide with two peaks of intracellular adenosine triphosphate concentration. Moreover, daily changes in the parasite population lead to differences in suramin sensitivity, a drug commonly used to treat this infection. These results demonstrate that parasites have an intrinsic circadian clock that is independent of the host, and which regulates parasite biology throughout the day.
The Earth's rotation forced life to evolve under cyclic day and night environmental changes. To anticipate such daily cycles, prokaryote and eukaryote free-living organisms evolved intrinsic clocks that regulate physiological and behavioural processes. Daily rhythms have been observed in organisms living within hosts, such as parasites. Whether parasites have intrinsic molecular clocks or whether they simply respond to host rhythmic physiological cues remains unknown. Here, we show that Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of human sleeping sickness, has an intrinsic circadian clock that regulates its metabolism in two different stages of the life cycle. We found that, in vitro, ∼10% of genes in T. brucei are expressed with a circadian rhythm. The maximum expression of these genes occurs at two different phases of the day and may depend on a post-transcriptional mechanism. Circadian genes are enriched in cellular metabolic pathways and coincide with two peaks of intracellular adenosine triphosphate concentration. Moreover, daily changes in the parasite population lead to differences in suramin sensitivity, a drug commonly used to treat this infection. These results demonstrate that parasites have an intrinsic circadian clock that is independent of the host, and which regulates parasite biology throughout the day.
The Earth’s rotation forced life to evolve under cyclic day and night
environmental changes. In order to anticipate such daily cycles, prokaryote and
eukaryote free-living organisms evolved intrinsic clocks that regulate physiological and
behavioral processes. Daily rhythms have been observed in organisms living within hosts,
such as parasites. Whether parasites have intrinsic molecular clocks or whether they
simply respond to host rhythmic physiological cues remains unknown. Here we show that
Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of human sleeping sickness,
has an intrinsic circadian clock that regulates its metabolism in two different stages
of the life cycle. We found that in vitro approximately 10% of
genes in T. brucei are expressed with a circadian rhythm. The maximum
expression of these genes occurs at two different phases of the day and may depend on a
post-transcriptional mechanism. Circadian genes are enriched in cellular metabolic
pathways, and coincide with two peaks of intracellular ATP concentration. Moreover,
daily changes in the parasite population lead to differences in suramin sensitivity, a
drug commonly used to treat this infection. These results demonstrate that parasites
have an intrinsic circadian clock, independent from the host and that regulates parasite
biology throughout the day.
Bloodstream and insect procyclic-form parasites have an intrinsic circadian
transcriptome
Here we asked whether T. brucei has an intrinsic circadian
clock. Since T. brucei is an extracellular parasite, the in
vitro culture provides a controllable environment with no interference
from the circadian rhythm of the host. In eukaryotes, the current model for
circadian timekeeping depends on a clock gene feedback[1]. However, clock genes are not
phylogenetically conserved among fungi, plants and vertebrates, indicating that each
phylum evolved an intrinsic clock with different components[2,3].
Furthermore, single-cell studies in cultures of mammalian fibroblasts have shown
that although each individual fibroblast in the population has an intrinsic clock
that cycles for multiple days with a period of 24h, the clocks of the fibroblasts
become rapidly desynchronized[4].
Resynchronization of cells in culture requires submitting them to an entrainment
protocol, which typically consist of temperature cycles, light/darkness or serum
shock[5,6].We chose an unbiased approach by probing the parasite transcriptome by
RNA-sequencing, searching for transcripts oscillating with a 24h period. Since
parasites were kept in culture, and desynchronization within the population of
parasites was likely to happen, we decided to entrain parasites by exposing them to
light/dark cycles, a strong environmental stimulus in many species. Bloodstream-form
parasites were synchronized to 12h intervals of light and darkness for three days.
On the 4th and 5th days, parasites were kept in either these
alternating conditions or in constant-darkness (so-called “free
running” conditions in the circadian rhythm field), during which parasite
RNA was collected every 4h and subjected to RNA-seq analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1).To determine whether there were any genes with a circadian expression pattern
in both conditions (alternating and constant), we used three well-established
algorithms to test if transcript levels cycled with a 24h period (see Methods). We
identified 366 genes cycling in the presence of the light/dark stimulus and 242
genes cycling in constant-darkness. To determine the false discovery rate (FDR) for
detection of cycling transcripts empirically, we performed a permutation test in
which we randomized the original time of sample collection and calculated the number
of cycling genes for 10,000 iterations. This test identified roughly the same number
of cycling genes as in the non-randomized analysis, suggesting that those 366 and
242 genes are not statistically significant (Supplementary Fig. 2). Together with fact that the number of
cycling genes identified is very low, we conclude that light is a weak environmental
cue for T. brucei bloodstream-forms, which may not be surprising
for a parasite that is not free-living.Since light/dark cycles did not appear to entrain bloodstream-form parasites,
we attempted to entrain parasites with a different environmental cue: temperature
cycles. These cycles act as a universal entraining signal in mice, able to
synchronize cell-autonomous oscillators throughout the body[6]. Inside the mammalian host parasites are
exposed to the circadian variation in body temperature, rising to a peak during the
active phase of the host[7].
Mammalian bloodstream-forms cultures were subjected to temperature cycles
(32°C/37°C cycles) for three days and RNA collected on days 4 and 5
from cultures kept in alternating conditions or at constant at 37°C (Figure 1a and Supplementary Fig. 3a). These
temperature-entrained samples collected during either alternating or constant
conditions were subjected to RNA-seq analysis to measure the changes of transcript
levels during the two day time-lapse.
Fig. 1
T. brucei has a circadian transcriptome in two stages of the
life cycle, mammalian bloodstream and insect procyclic-forms. (a)
Populations of parasites were entrained to 12h: 12h temperature intervals for
three days, after which they were kept in alternating conditions or released
into constant conditions for two days. During these two days, RNA was collected
every 4h for RNA-seq (see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 3). (b) Gene expression
heatmap views of temperature-entrained cycling genes of bloodstream and
procyclic-forms. Each row represents a gene, ordered vertically by phase,
determined by ARSER. N=Total number of cycling genes identified. Supplementary Data
1–2. (c) Phase distribution of cycling genes
entrained by temperature. The phase of each gene’s rhythm across the day
is represented in a histogram plot (top) and rose plot (bottom). The mean
circular phase of the different phase clusters is indicated by an orange dashed
line. (d) Venn diagram of number of cycling genes identified in
temperature-entrained cycling and constant conditions for bloodstream (left) and
insect procyclic-forms (right). (e) Period distribution of genes
cycling in alternating (teal) and constant (grey) temperature in both life cycle
stages. The total area under the curve is one for each condition. In alternating
temperature conditions, the period of cycling genes is centred around 24h, while
in constant temperature, the distribution of period of cycling genes is broader.
The dashed line indicates the expected entraining period of 24h for the
alternating conditions.
Within each temperature-entrained dataset, an unbiased comparison of the 13
samples using hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis showed that a
cyclic pattern component accounted for ~27% of the total variance,
being the first component in both bloodstream-form datasets. This shows that the
time of sample collection is a key factor in these samples (Supplementary Fig. 3c).
Circadian analysis of temperature-entrained bloodstream-forms (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 1) revealed that ~1100–1500
transcripts cycled, in which 1,490 genes (~15% of genome) oscillate
in alternating conditions and 1,092 genes (~11% of genome) in
constant temperature (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 3 and
4). Two examples of
cycling transcripts are shown in Fig.
2a–b.
Fig. 2
Circadian expression is temperature compensated and detected in
vivo during a mouse infection. (a) Genome browser
views of RNA-seq coverage from bloodstream-form parasites in
temperature-entrained conditions for two genes: Tb927.10.16100, FK506-binding
protein (FKBP)-type peptidyl-prolyl isomerase, putative and Tb927.1.4830,
phospholipase A1 (genes represented in teal) out of the ~1100 genes
cycling. CDS (coding sequence) is represented as a green rectangle and
intergenic regions as gray dotted line. Reads coverage is shown in black as
reads per million total reads (RPM) across 48h. (b) RPKM (reads per
kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) quantification of RNA-seq read
coverage and circadian algorithm fits. ARSER fit is represented in a dark gray
dashed line, JTK_CYCLE in teal and Fisher’s G-Test in orange.
Represented genes are same as above: FKBP (JTK_CYCLE, ARSER and Fisher’s
G-Test p<0.01) and phospholipase A1 (ARSER and Fisher’s G-Test
p<0.05). (c) Period of oscillation of 127 common cycling
genes at constant temperatures of 28°C and 37°C. Distribution of
the estimated temperature coefficient (Q10) for the period of the 127
common cycling genes. (d) Expression of two representative cycling
genes in vitro (left) and in vivo (right) (9
genes cycled in vivo out of the 11 genes tested, more examples
in Supplementary Fig.
5). Transcript values in vitro were retrieved from
RNA-seq analysis of bloodstream-form transcriptome in constant temperature. To
measure transcript levels in vivo, RNA was extracted from
parasites in the blood of infected mice. Transcript levels of proline
dehydrogenase (Tb927.7.210) and putative amino acid transporter (Tb927.8.7650)
were normalized to non-cycling transcripts of zinc finger protein 3 (ZFP3,
Tb927.3.720, teal) and acidic phosphatase (Tb927.5.610, dark teal). N =
18 (3 mice/time point). Error bars represent standard error. Genes were found
cycling significantly by ARSER, p<0.05.
Unlike what we observed when bloodstream-form parasites were subjected to
light/dark cycles, upon temperature-entrainment the permutation test revealed that
the number of cycling genes identified in the correct sampling order was
significantly higher than when sampling order was randomly permutated (FDR <
0.05, Supplementary Fig.
2), indicating that we are detecting transcript oscillations above background
noise and therefore the temperature-entrainment protocol can synchronize the
bloodstream-form parasite population. But are these oscillations dependent on
temperature-entrainment or would they be detected in cultures without entrainment?
To confirm that temperature-entrainment was required, we compared the cycling genes
identified in two constant conditions (both at 37°C in darkness): either
after temperature-entrainment (1092 genes) or light/dark cycles (242 genes) (Supplementary Fig. 5b). As
explained above, we did not detect statistically significant oscillating genes after
light/dark cycles, suggesting that the circadian clocks of the parasites in the population
remained asynchronous. Therefore, the constant-darkness dataset is a fair proxy of
‘no entrainment’ conditions. If a transcript oscillation is
dependent on entrainment, this gene should only oscillate after
temperature-entrainment. Indeed, 1050 of 1092 genes (96%) exclusively
oscillate after temperature-entrainment, suggesting those transcript oscillations
are temperature-entrainment dependent.The majority of the oscillating genes have a maximum expression at
environmental Zeitgeber Time (ZT) ZT8 and ZT20 (Fig.
1c), a bimodal distribution that is also typical in other
eukaryotes[8]. In constant
temperature, phases are shifted ~2–3h corresponding to Circadian
Time (CT) CT11 and CT22 (Fig. 1c). As observed
in other systems[9,10], we found that the oscillatory transcriptome
is divergent between alternating and constant conditions and three categories were
identified: i) genes oscillating in alternating conditions only (temperature-driven
and clock independent) (1,243 genes of bloodstream-forms); ii) genes oscillating in
both alternating and constant conditions (clock-driven genes) (247 genes); iii)
genes oscillating in constant conditions only (genes whose cycling is suppressed or
masked during entrainment conditions) (845 genes) (Fig. 1d). A hallmark of circadian rhythm predicts that if parasites are
entrained to temperature cycles, we should expect that in the presence of
entrainment the period of the cycling transcripts to be precisely 24h and when the
stimulus is removed (constant conditions) the period should remain close to 24h, but
not as precisely. This is indeed what we observed. The median period of the 247
genes cycling in alternating temperature was centred around 24h and it was shorter
in constant temperature. The variance of the period lengths was significantly
tighter in alternating temperature compared to constant conditions
(Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p<2.2×10−16, Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 6). These
results indicate, once again, that entrainment of these transcript oscillations is
dependent on temperature cycles.Among the mammalian bloodstream-forms, there are actually two distinct stages
of the life cycle that are transcriptionally different: the replicative bloodstream
slender and the short-lived cell-cycle arrested bloodstream stumpy-forms.
Slender-forms differentiate into the transmissible stumpy-form, via a mechanism of
quorum sensing typically triggered in vitro at
densities higher than ~106 parasites/mL[11]. These two life cycle stages are
transcriptionally and metabolically different, which could add noise to our
circadian studies[12,13]. In order to have cultures with replicative
slender-forms only, we kept each culture below 106 parasites/mL. To
further confirm that our parasite population was primarily composed by
slender-forms, we repeated the temperature-entrainment with a
GFP::PAD1utr reporter cell line, in which a GFP gene is followed by a
PAD1 3′ UTR that confers maximum expression in stumpy-forms[14](Supplementary Fig. 7). By
FACS, we assessed GFP expression and cell cycle profile by propidium iodide
staining. We found that ~95% of our cultures were GFP-negative with
no apparent G1-cell cycle arrest, indicating that most parasites were in
slender-form in all time points. We conclude that slender-forms alone can be
responsible for the observed circadian gene expression.When the host is bitten by a tsetse fly, T. brucei
stumpy-forms differentiate into procyclic-forms that are adapted to live in the
mid-gut of the fly where the temperature is much lower (~28°C). Even
though the transcriptome of bloodstream and insect procyclic-forms is
~30% distinct[15],
we tested whether insect procyclic trypanosomes share a circadian transcriptome
temperature-entraining with 23°C/28°C cycles (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 3). As seen in bloodstream-forms, an
unbiased comparison of the 13 samples in each dataset using hierarchical clustering
and principal component analysis showed that a cyclic pattern component accounted
for 20–27% of the total variance, being the first component in both
datasets. In these trypanosomes, we identified 1,123 genes cycling in alternating
conditions and 854 genes cycling endogenously, i.e., after temperature-entrainment
was removed (Fig. 1a–d and Supplementary Data 2 and
Fig. 3–4). Of these, 127 genes
(~1–2% of transcriptome) oscillate in both life cycle
stages, while 965 are specific to bloodstream and 727 are specific to
procyclic-forms (Supplementary
Fig. 5a). The analysis to confirm if oscillations are dependent on
temperature-entrainment cannot be done for the insect procyclic-forms because we did
not perform light/dark entrainment in this life cycle stage.Overall, these data show that in each of the two stages of the life cycle of
T. brucei, ~10% of the transcriptome undergoes
circadian oscillations, suggesting that having a circadian rhythm might have
conferred an evolutionary advantage throughout the parasite life cycle. The fact
that most cycling genes differ between the two stages indicates that the circadian
clock can sense and adapt to the different host environments, another hallmark of
circadian clocks[8].
Daily transcriptome is temperature compensated
We showed above that transcript oscillations are entrained by temperature
cycles. Another canonical property of circadian clocks is temperature compensation:
the ability of the period of a rhythm to remain relatively constant at various
physiologically permissive temperatures[6]. The Q10 temperature coefficient measures the rate of
change in a biological system when temperature is increased 10°C. Whereas
kinetics of most biological systems double or triple when increasing 10°C
(and thus Q10 within 2 and 3), the rate of biological reactions regulated
by a circadian rhythm does not change with a temperature increase (Q10
~1)[6]. To test if
T. brucei transcript oscillations are temperature compensated,
we compared the periods of 127 genes that oscillate in constant 28°C and
constant 37°C (Supplementary Fig. 5a). We observed no significant changes and the
average Q10 is 0.99 ± 0.13 (standard deviation, Fig. 2c) showing that the circadian clock in T.
brucei is temperature compensated.
Parasite gene transcripts also cycle in a mouse infection
As the identification of the trypanosome circadian transcriptome was
performed from parasites grown in culture, next we tested whether transcript
oscillations could also be found in vivo, i.e., in parasites from
an infected mouse. For this, we collected blood every 4h, RNA was extracted and
subjected to qPCR. We confirmed that transcript levels of most genes also cycled
in vivo (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5d, nine
transcripts cycled out of 11 tested), including proline dehydrogenase and a putative
amino acid transporter.When we compare the circadian transcriptome of T. brucei
(bloodstream and procyclic) with other organisms, we note that T.
brucei has fewer cycling transcripts than a mouse liver (~10
versus 20%, respectively)[16], but it is has significantly more than those identified in
human and mouse immortalized cell lines (0.1–1.2%)[17,18]. The amplitude of the oscillations in bloodstream is on
average ~1.4-fold (~40% difference), which is within the
range of what is described (~2.3-fold in the mouse liver[16] and low in cell lines[17,18]).
This lower amplitude found in culture systems may be due to asynchrony within the
cell population (diluting the maximum and minimum expression levels), as well as,
the absence of additional entraining cues present in vivo. In fact,
for the genes we studied in vivo, we observed on average higher
amplitude than in vitro (1.86- ±0.06 and 1.49-fold
±0.1 SD, respectively, p<0.001, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). The
fact that Gim5A transcript (Supplementary Fig. 5d) showed opposite phases when measured in
vitro RNA-seq and in vivo real-time PCR suggests once
more that there may be additional entraining signals in vivo that
differentially affect the amplitude and phase of gene expression[19].Taken together, these results show that host physiological rhythms
(in vivo) and temperature (in culture) are capable of
synchronizing T. brucei parasites, and that the transcriptome
circadian oscillation is driven by an endogenous clock.
Circadian regulation is post-transcriptional
Even though in eukaryotes the circadian timekeeping mechanism is based on a
transcription/translation feedback loop model, recent studies have shown that
post-transcriptional and post-translational steps impose further levels of circadian
regulation[20]. T.
brucei and other Kinetoplastida are peculiar eukaryotes as most of the
genome is organized in polycistronic units (PCUs) that are constitutively
transcribed and, as a result, gene expression is mainly regulated
post-transcriptionally[21,22]. To determine whether T.
brucei circadian gene expression was also post-transcriptionally
regulated, we tested whether cycling genes clustered in specific PCUs. We found that
cycling genes show a uniform distribution among most PCUs (similar proportion of
cycling and non-cycling genes, Kolmogorov-Smirnov p > 0.1), with no bias for
a specific position within a PCU (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p > 0.5), nor
enrichment for genes peaking at a specific phase (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p
> 0.1, Fig. 3a–d and Supplementary Fig. 8). The
fact that co-transcribed genes can either not cycle or cycle with a maximum
expression at opposing phases indicates that the timekeeping mechanism used by
T. brucei is primarily based on post-transcriptional
regulation, which represents a different mechanism of timekeeping in eukaryotes.
Fig. 3
T. brucei cycling gene expression is post-transcriptionally
regulated. (a–b) Distribution of cycling genes genes across
chromosomes 1, 2 and 3 (all 11 chromosomes are represented in Supplementary Fig. 8).
The transcription start site (TSS) at the beginning of each polycistronic unit
(PCUs) and direction of transcription is indicated by a vertical black flag.
Genes are either: gray when non-cycling; orange when cycling with maximal
expression between Circadian time CT3-CT18 for (a) bloodstream or CT18-CT9 for
(b) insect procyclic-forms; and teal when cycling with maximal expression
between CT19-CT2 for (a) bloodstream or CT10-CT19 for (b) insect
procyclic-forms. (c–d) Cycling genes with different phases
of expression encoded in the same PCU in (c) bloodstream-forms and in (d) insect
procyclic-forms. A representative PCU from each of the first three chromosomes
is depicted (chromosomes 1–3 have 11, 17 and 12 PCUs, respectively. From
these, in bloodstream-forms, 8/11, 10/17 and 10/12 PCUs have cycling genes. In
procyclic-forms 7/11, 6/17 and 10/12 PCUs have cycling genes). (e)
Cell cycle profile analysis of bloodstream parasites throughout the
4th day of alternating temperature. Parasites were fixed and
stained with propidium iodide and analysed by FACS. ZT refers to
Zeitgeiber time, in which ZT = 0h corresponds to
the beginning of the cold period (32°C). Error bars represent standard
error. N=3 biological replicates. (f) Expression profile of
two cell cycle associated genes (DNA topoisomerase II, putative (TOP2),
Tb927.11.11540 and cdc2-related kinase 3, putative (CRK3), Tb927.10.4990)
measured with RNA-seq from cultures in constant temperature. RPKM refers to
reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads.
Circadian transcriptome is not a consequence of the cell cycle
In culture, T. brucei parasites replicate every
~6–7h in bloodstream-forms and every ~11–12h in
procyclic-forms. Although circadian oscillations have a period of ~24h, we
wondered whether temperature-entrainment could synchronize the cell cycle of
parasites and as a result, cell cycle could be contributing to the circadian
oscillations of transcripts. To rule out this possibility, we temperature-entrained
T. brucei bloodstream cultures and collected cells throughout
the day to measure DNA content. Not surprisingly, we observed that parasite cultures
in alternating conditions grew slower than in constant 37°C (7:33h versus
6:53h doubling time, respectively). However, the frequency of dividing cells in the
population was constant throughout the day (~30% in G2/M) suggesting
that parasite cell division was not synchronized to occur at a certain time of the
day (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, among cycling
transcripts, we detected no enrichment of cell cycle associated genes (Supplementary table 1), as
illustrated by the expression profile of DNA topoisomerase II and cdc2-related
kinase 3 (Fig. 3f). Together, these data
indicate that the cyclic pattern of T. brucei bloodstream
transcriptome is not dependent on the cell cycle.
The metabolism of the parasite population changes throughout the day
To explore the biological relevance of a circadian clock in T.
brucei, we performed a temporal Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. We
assigned the genes that cycled in constant temperature in bloodstream and
procyclic-forms into 12 groups based on the phase of maximal expression and
evaluated the enrichment of GO terms (Fig. 4a
and Supplementary Data 4).
We found that 95% of cycling GO terms are enriched in only one phase cluster
in bloodstream-form (93% in insect procyclic-forms), suggesting that
specific cellular processes are upregulated at different times of the day. One such
process is carbohydrate metabolism, in which 13 out of 31 genes annotated to this GO
term peaked expression at CT22-24 (Fig. 4a).
Among those genes, ten belong to the glycolysis pathway (Supplementary Fig. 9). The
insect-stage parasite circadian gene expression also seems to upregulate different
cellular functions throughout the day. For example, vesicle-mediated transport GO
term is composed of 13 genes, nine of which peak at CT0-2 (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4
The T. brucei circadian transcriptome regulates metabolism
related genes.
(a) Heatmap view of GO term enrichment of both bloodstream and
insect-stage parasite circadian gene expression throughout the day (2h phase
cluster, p<0.05, Hypergeometric test, Supplementary Data 4).
Side plots show individual gene expression profile of the manually curated most
significantly enriched GO term in the selected clusters. In each plot, we have
indicated the number of cycling genes with the designated phase, out of the
total number of genes in the specific GO term. Relative expression refers to
relative expression calculated by RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript per
million mapped reads) levels of each gene normalized by its mean across the 13
time points. (b) Metabolic pathways are enriched in intrinsic
cycling genes expressed at different times of the day. The total area under the
curve is one for each pathway. Genes belonging to six out of the 55 KEGG
pathways are shown. (c) Parasite intracellular ATP concentrations
were measured on day four from cultures in alternating or constant temperature
from two independent experiments from a minimum of six biological replicates per
condition.
A pathway analysis (KEGG) confirmed that many cycling genes are involved in
metabolism or metabolism-associated functions. Even though a cycling gene peaks only
once a day, other genes from the same metabolic pathway may not oscillate, peak at
the same phase or an opposite phase (Fig. 4b).
This overall transcript oscillation of metabolism-associated genes suggests that
during the 24h day the parasite population undergo qualitative and quantitative
metabolic adaptations. Because expression of most cycling genes peaks at two
opposing phases of the day (Fig. 4b), it is
likely that, as observed in mammals, parasites experience metabolic ‘rush
hours’ twice a day[8]. To
test this hypothesis, we temperature-entrained T. brucei
bloodstream cultures and collected cells throughout the day to measure intracellular
ATP concentrations. We found that ATP content was higher at ZT/CT8 and ZT/CT20,
which coincided with the time at which metabolic genes present the highest
transcript levels (Fig. 4c).
Circadian rhythms impact parasite resistance to challenges
From the pathway analysis in bloodstream-forms, we also identified some
cycling genes involved in redox metabolism (Fig.
4b and Supplementary
Fig. 10). To test if such gene expression oscillations lead to different
levels of sensitivity to oxidative stress throughout the day, we
temperature-entrained bloodstream-forms and, starting every 4h through the day we
incubated parasites with H2O2 for 1h and measured their
viability. We observed a time-dependent sensitivity to H2O2
treatment, which was 2.6-fold higher at CT4 than at CT16 (p<0.001, Fig. 5a). These results confirm that circadian
metabolic gene expression patterns have functional consequences to the overall
metabolic and redox state of bloodstream-form parasites.
Fig. 5
The T. brucei circadian transcriptome affects the sensitivity of
the parasite to stresses. (a) Dose response curve from oxidative
stress sensitivity challenge and the respective IC50 calculated at
different times of the day. Bloodstream-form parasites were treated with serial
dilution of H2O2 concentrations. Non-linear regression
(variable slope, four parameters) comparison shows LogIC50 is
different (p<0.0001) between time points. N = 6 biological
replicates. Error bars represent the standard error. CT refers to Circadian
Time. (b) Dose response curve from suramin treatment of parasites
at different times of the day and the respective IC50 calculated for
each time point. Bloodstream-form parasites were collected around the clock and
treated with serial dilution of suramin concentrations and viability measured.
Non-linear regression (variable slope, four parameters) comparison shows
LogIC50 is different (p<0.0001) between time points. N
= 9 biological replicates tested in three independent experiments. Error
bars represent the standard error. CT refers to Circadian Time, in which CT0 is
the time when cultures would be transitioned to the cold (32°C) during
the entrainment period, but instead here they are kept in constant temperature
(37°C) free-running conditions.
Since parasites display a different transcriptome at different times of the
day, we wondered whether this would affect the sensitivity of bloodstream-form
parasites to suramin, a drug commonly used in the field to treat sleeping sickness
patients. Similar to the oxidative stress experiment, we temperature-entrained
bloodstream-form parasites and beginning every 4h through the day we tested cell
viability upon a 24h in vitro treatment with suramin. We observed
that the parasites are more resistant to suramin treatment beginning at CT8, which
is reflected in a higher IC50 (p<0.001), as 2.5-fold higher drug
concentration is needed to kill these parasites (Fig.
5b). Thus, we conclude that during the day bloodstream-form parasites are
not equally sensitive to suramin treatment.
Discussion
Various studies in pathogens[23-27] and
microbiota[28,29] have described daily rhythms in
microorganisms living inside hosts. However in these experiments it was not
established whether such behavior was endogenously controlled by the pathogen, or
whether rhythms were imposed by the host. Indeed the 24h variations in the
microbiome appear to be driven by the host and by its feeding regime[28,29]. Because T. brucei is extracellular and it
can be easily cultured, it is an ideal system to study whether a pathogen has an
intrinsic mechanism to keep time. By analysing the transcriptome of parasites grown
in vitro after entrainment to temperature, we found that
T. brucei has a circadian oscillating transcriptome.What is the difference between a circadian rhythm and a response to a subtle
heat-shock? A circadian clock has three bona-fide hallmarks that we found in
trypanosomes: it has a free running period of ~24h in constant conditions,
it is entrainable and it is temperature compensated. The first hallmark was met when
we found ~1100 genes that oscillate in constant conditions with a free
running period of ~24h. Entrainment is supported by two observations. First,
96% of the temperature-entrained transcript oscillations in
bloodstream-forms are absent under light/dark cycle conditions where entrainment did
not appear to occur (Supplementary
Fig. 5b). Second, the period and phase of T. brucei
oscillating genes were close but somewhat different between alternating and constant
conditions (Fig. 1c and e). The hallmark of
temperature compensation was demonstrated by the fact that the period of oscillating
genes remains ~24h when parasites are either at 37°C or 28°C
(Fig. 2c).In this study we showed that replicative slender bloodstream-form and
procyclic-form parasites have circadian transcriptomes that regulate multiple
metabolic pathways. In addition, its is possible that with a circadian clock
parasites are better prepared to escape the host immune response, which is itself
under circadian control[30]. A
circadian clock may also be important for transmission success: since tsetse fly has
a daily biting pattern[31], having
transmissible forms ready to match when the vector tsetse is more likely to bite
would be an advantage. Also within tissues, parasites with a timekeeping mechanism
could anticipate fluctuations in nutrient availability within the interstitial
spaces. Although it is likely that the transmissible non-replicative
stumpy-form[32] and the
recently described adipose tissue form[14] also have circadian rhythms, this still requires further
analysis.The transcriptomic oscillations result in cyclic changes in the parasite
population with a ~24h period, primarily at the metabolic level. Since
bloodstream-form parasites divide every 7h, parasites in the morning are different
from those in the evening, an unprecedented concept in disease-causing pathogens.
These rhythms are likely an important adaptation since in vivo
their host environment (mammal or insect) also undergoes circadian changes[30,33].Many questions remain to be answered in the future. What is the daily
transcriptome of bloodstream-forms in vivo? Due to the complexity
of the host environment, we would expect to identify a larger number of parasite
oscillating genes and with more robust amplitudes. What are the core clock genes
that drive these oscillations in gene expression? This will be essential not only to
understand the molecular mechanism underlying circadian rhythm in trypanosomes, but
also to use it as a tool to demonstrate which of the oscillations detected
in vivo are a result of an intrinsic parasite clock and which
ones are imposed by the host. Finally, it will be interesting to test whether light
and dark cycles can entrain procyclic-forms, as these parasites are more exposed to
light while in the tsetse fly.This study demonstrates the potential of high-throughput approaches for
identifying circadian patterns in the transcriptome of non-model organisms and it
provides a foundation for the search of the master regulators of this process in
T. brucei and for the search for endogenous clocks in other
important infectious agents such as the malaria parasite.
Methods
Ethics Statement
All animal care and experimental procedures were performed in accordance
with University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) IACUC guidelines,
approved by the Ethical Review Committee at the University of Southwestern
Medical Center and performed under the IACUC-2012-0021 protocol.
Parasites and Culture Conditions
T. brucei AnTat 1.1E, a pleomorphic clone,
derived from an EATRO1125 clone was originally isolated from blood of
Tragelaphus scriptus in Uganda. For all the experiments, we
used AnTat 1.1E 90-13, a transgenic cell-line encoding the
tetracyclin repressor and T7 RNA polymerase[34].Bloodstream-forms were grown routinely in HMI-11 at 37°C in
5% CO2[35].
For all RNA-seq experiments individual cultures of parasites were prepared,
adjusting the initial parasite density so that parasite cultures would be at
106 parasites/mL at each collection time point. Parasite numbers
were calculated using a Hemocytometer. Synchronizations were done for three days
in alternating temperature or light conditions. For the bloodstream-forms -
Temperature RNA-seq experiment, culture flasks were moved every 12h between
incubators either at 32°C or 37°C or remained at constant
37°C. In the bloodstream-forms - Light/Dark entrainment RNA-seq
experiment, a warm white LED 3W lamp was used to illuminate the cultures inside
the incubator. Temperature was kept at 37°C and fluctuations were
monitored and shown to be less than 0.1°C. At the end of day three (72
h), culture flasks were split into alternating or constant conditions groups.
RNA samples were collected every 4h for two days (a total of 13 samples per
condition, with the second cycle acting as biological replicate).Differentiation of bloodstream-forms to procyclic-forms was induced by
adding 6 mM cis-acconitate to DTM medium and by reducing temperature to
28°C. The newly differentiated procyclic cultures were maintained as
described previously[36].
Differentiation was assessed by EP Procyclin expression, using
anti-Trypanosoma brucei Procyclin, FITC mouse IgG1
(Cedarlane Labs). For the procyclic-form RNA-seq experiment, culture flasks were
moved every 12h between incubators either at 23°C or 28°C or
remained at constant 28°C. For a schematic representation see Figure 1A and Supplementary Fig. 1 and
2.To confirm that the bloodstream-form cultures were primarily composed of
slender forms, we used a GFP::PAD1utr reporter cell line, in which a
GFP gene is followed by a PAD1 3′ UTR that confers maximum expression in
stumpy forms.
Transcriptome Sequencing (RNA-seq)
RNA was isolated from ~107
Trypanosoma brucei cells (density of
~106/mL) with TRIzol reagent according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). 1 μg of total
RNA was enriched for mRNA using Poly-A beads for RNA-seq according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). The removal of ribosomal RNAs
was confirmed on a Bioanalyzer Nano Chip (Agilent Technologies). Sequencing
libraries were constructed using the TruSeq RNA Sample preparation protocol
(Illumina). RNA-sequencing of libraries was performed in the HiSeq2000 platform
(Illumina) with 50-bp reads according to manufacturer’s instructions by
the UTSW McDermott Next Generation Sequencing Core and Beijing Genomics
Institute (BGI). Read quality was assessed using the FASTQC quality control tool
(http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The
SolexaQA suite of programs[37]
was used to trim raw reads to their longest contiguous segment above a PHRED
quality threshold of 28, and reads smaller than 25 nucleotides long were
discarded. Reads were mapped to the T. brucei TREU927 reference
genome using bowtie (v1.0.0)[38]
allowing for 2 mismatches and only non-ambiguous alignments (options –v
2 –m 1). The number of reads mapping to each gene was determined, and
then normalized to RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped
reads) (excluding a highly expressed VSG gene from the calculation) using the R
software environment and the packages
GenomicAlignments[39], Biostrings[40] and
rtracklayer[41] from Bioconductor[42].The number of uniquely mapped reads in each sample (~20 million
reads) was enough to detect the expression of more than 80% percent of
annotated T. brucei genes (5 or more reads mapped over CDS),
and it was verified that this number does not increase significantly with added
depth. The distribution of RPKM values in each sample was plotted and verified
to be similar across all samples.
Time Series Analysis for Circadian Cycling
Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed and heatmaps of Spearman
correlations from centered log2 transformed RPKM values (Supplementary Figs. 1b
and 3c–d) were
done in the R software environment using the function heatmap.2 from the
gplots package[43]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was done on
centered and log2 transformed RPKM values using the function
princomp.RNA cycling was assessed by three programs: GeneCycle[44], that implements
Fisher’s G-Test, JTK_CYCLE[45] and ARSER[46]. For Fisher’s G-Test and JTK_CYCLE analyses, RPKM
data were detrended by linear regression. A gene was considered cycling if two
out of three programs detected periodic expression with threshold of p ≤
0.05 and mean expression higher than 10 RPKM. This cutoff was defined by
assessing the coefficient of variation in relation to the mean expression across
all time points. The amplitude, period and phase reported by ARSER were used for
further analyses. The heatmaps of phases in figure
1b and Supplementary Fig. 1d plot the z-score transformed RPKM values,
ordered by the phase determined by ARSER. The peaks of expression phase
distributions were determined by fitting a mixed von Mises-Fisher model to the
bimodal phase distributions using the R software environment and the
movMF package[47], extracting the means of the two von Mises-Fisher
distributions.To determine the false discovery rate (FDR) of identification of cycling
genes the time point of collection were randomized and number of cycling genes
assessed. These permutation tests were run 10,000 times for each of the six
datasets.
Chromosome Distribution of Cycling Genes
Uniform distribution of cycling genes among PCUs was tested by comparing
the distribution of proportions of cycling/non-cycling genes per PCU with a
distribution obtained by randomly sampling 10,000 times the same number of genes
from the genome. To test if cycling genes displayed a bias in their positioning
within PCUs, the distance of each gene to its nearest upstream transcription
start site (TSS) was calculated and then the distributions of these distances
for cycling genes only and for all genes were compared. In order to test if
cycling genes within a PCU tend to peak at the same phase, the distribution of
proportions of each phase cluster within PCUs with a random distribution
obtained by randomly permuting the cluster assignment of cycling genes 10,000
times were compared. For these three analyses significance was assessed by a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Mice Infection and Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis
The infections of 18 wild-type male C57BL/6J mice, 6–10 week old
(UT Southwestern Medical Center Mouse Breeding Core Facility) described in this
manuscript were performed by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 2,000
T. brucei AnTat 1.1E parasites[14]. Prior to infection,
T. brucei cryostabilates were thawed and parasite viability
and numbers were assessed by mobility under a microscope. Mice were individually
housed in activity wheel-equipped cages under Light:Dark 12:12h for 7 days after
which animals were kept in dark conditions. Chow and water were available
ad libitum. Locomotor activity was recorded and analyzed
using ClockLab software (Actimetrics, Wilmette, IL) to determine the circadian
phase, as previously described[48], for each animal on day 20 post-infection. Mice were
assigned to six time points of collection, and every 4h three mice were
sacrificed and terminal cardiac blood samples were collected. All mice included
in the study were infected, confirmed by measuring the parasitemia. Group sizes
were determined based on early in vivo experiments using this
experimental model[14], and
animals were randomly selected for each time-point of collection. All
quantitative analyses were performed in a blinded manner. RNA was extracted with
TRIzol LS according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life
Technologies), and reverse transcription and real-time PCR were performed as
described previously[49]. Primer
efficiencies were determined using standard curves with 3-log10
coverage. Transcript levels were normalized to genes zinc finger protein 3
(ZFP3, Tb927.3.720) and a putative acidic phosphatase (Tb927.5.610) whose
expression remained constant in both temperature and light alternating
conditions. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary table
2.
Assessment of Metabolic Activity and Cell Cycle Stage
Bloodstream-form parasites were cultured and entrained by temperature as
described above for the RNA-seq experiment. Samples were collected every 4h
throughout the day.For metabolic activity assessment through measurement of ATP
concentration from parasite population, parasitemia was assessed and metabolic
activity was measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions of
CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega) from 1
× 105 parasites centrifuged and resuspended in 25μl
trypanosome dilution buffer (TDB, 5 mM KCl, 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgSO4,
20mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM NaH2PO4, 20 mM
glucose, pH 7.7). ATP concentration was measured in two independent experiments
from a minimum of six biological replicates.For cell cycle analysis, 2 × 106 parasites were fixed
by slowly adding ethanol to a final concentration of 70%. Fixed
trypanosomes were pelleted and stained with 0.5 mL in PBS/2 mM EDTA containing
10 μg RNAse A and 1 mg propidium iodide for 30 min at 37°C.
Percentage of cells dividing was measured in three independent experiments from
a minimum of 30 000 events. Intensity of red fluorescence was measured using a
FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using
FlowJo.
Functional analysis of cycling genes
Cycling genes identified by RNA-seq were clustered in 12 groups
(CT0-CT2, CT2-CT4, etc.) based on their expression peak. T.
brucei GO term annotations were obtained from TriTrypDB. GO term
enrichment was assessed in each group by Hypergeometric test using
GOstats[50] and by
Fisher’s Exact Test and plotted as heatmap in figure 4a. Manually curated GO term was defined when
both statistical tests show enrichment (p<0.05) and more than 3 genes
annotated to a GO term were cycling with the determined phase (see Supplementary Data
4).
Suramin and H2O2 sensitivity assay
Bloodstream-form parasites were cultured and entrained by temperature as
described above for the RNA-seq experiment. Every 4h, parasites were harvested
from exponential phase cultures, counted and plated in 96 well flat-bottom
microtiter plates at a parasite density of 10,000–20,000 cells/well.
Serial dilution concentrations (1:3) of suramin (Sigma) were added. The compound
was applied in triplicate at eight concentrations and incubated for 24h at
37°C. For the oxidative stress experiment, H2O2
(Sigma) at six different dilutions were tested (1:10) and parasites were
incubated for one hour at 37°C. Alamar Blue (Sigma) was used to
determine cell viability by adding at ten percent of the well volume followed by
4h incubation at 37°C. Fluorescence was measured with 530ex/590em nm and
percentage of live cells calculated by normalizing to non treated parasites.
Calculation of IC50 values was done by 4-parameter nonlinear curve
fit (GraphPad Prism) and significance assessed by the extra sum-of-squares F
test. H2O2 sensitivity was tested in two independent
experiments from a total of six biological replicates. Suramin resistance was
tested in three independent experiments and IC50 values are shown as
the mean of those experiments (N = 9).
Data availability
The RNA-seq datasets are often referred to as CW for cold/warm
alternating conditions, WW for warm/warm constant conditions, LD light/dark
alternating conditions and DD for dark/dark constant conditions. RPKM and
circadian oscillation analysis of all these datasets are available in the
present manuscript as Supplementary Data 1–3. RNA-seq datasets generated as part
of this study have also been submitted to the ArrayExpress database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under accession ID
E-MTAB-4952.
Authors: Karin M Lindström; Olga Dolnik; Michael Yabsley; Olof Hellgren; Barry O'Connor; Henrik Pärn; Johannes Foufopoulos Journal: J Parasitol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 1.276
Authors: Julia Hoffmann; Laura Symul; Anton Shostak; Tamás Fischer; Felix Naef; Michael Brunner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maura Rojas-Pirela; Diego Andrade-Alviárez; Verónica Rojas; Ulrike Kemmerling; Ana J Cáceres; Paul A Michels; Juan Luis Concepción; Wilfredo Quiñones Journal: Open Biol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 6.411
Authors: Kimberley F Prior; Filipa Rijo-Ferreira; Patricia A Assis; Isabella C Hirako; David R Weaver; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Sarah E Reece Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 31.316