Literature DB >> 28287942

FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging.

Amish Lakhani1, Sairah R Khan1, Nishat Bharwani1, Victoria Stewart1, Andrea G Rockall1, Sameer Khan1, Tara D Barwick1.   

Abstract

The role of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose ( FDG fluorodeoxyglucose ) is now established in the assessment of many gynecologic and genitourinary malignant tumors. FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has been widely adopted for staging assessments in patients with suspected advanced disease, in cases of suspected disease recurrence, and for determining prognosis in a number of malignancies. A number of pitfalls are commonly encountered when reviewing FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans in gynecologic and genitourinary cases; these pitfalls can be classified into those that yield potential false-positive or false-negative results. Potential false positives include physiologic uptake of FDG fluorodeoxyglucose by the endometrium and ovaries in premenopausal patients, physiologic renal excretion of FDG fluorodeoxyglucose into the ureters and the urinary bladder, and increased FDG fluorodeoxyglucose activity in benign conditions such as uterine fibroids, pelvic inflammatory disease, and benign endometriotic cysts. Potential false negatives include low-level FDG fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by necrotic, mucinous, cystic, or low-grade tumors and the masking of serosal and peritoneal disease by adjacent physiologic bowel or bladder activity. In addition, there are inherent technical limitations-such as motion artifact (from respiratory motion and bowel peristalsis) and the limited spatial resolution of PET-that may limit the assessment of small-volume malignant disease. Knowledge of the key imaging features of physiologic and nonphysiologic FDG fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, in addition to understanding the principles of adequate patient preparation and PET scanning protocols, is important for accurate interpretation of gynecologic and genitourinary oncologic FDG fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT studies. ©RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28287942     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2017160059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  13 in total

Review 1.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies.

Authors:  Ahmed Ebada Salem; Gabriel C Fine; Matthew F Covington; Bhasker R Koppula; Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  What's New in Imaging for Gynecologic Cancer?

Authors:  Sairah R Khan; Mubarik Arshad; Kathryn Wallitt; Victoria Stewart; Nishat Bharwani; Tara D Barwick
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Mucinous urachal adenocarcinoma: A potential nonfluorodeoxyglucose-avid pitfall on 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Jeeban Paul Das; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-09-14

4.  CT-less Direct Correction of Attenuation and Scatter in the Image Space Using Deep Learning for Whole-Body FDG PET: Potential Benefits and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Jaewon Yang; Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Grant T Gullberg; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-12-02

5.  Krukenburg Tumors Arising from Rare Primary Sites: Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Management and Outcome.

Authors:  Kasturi Rangan; Manish Ora; Amrin Israrahmed; Sanjay Gambhir
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

6.  Relationship between Standard Uptake Values of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Salivary Metabolites in Oral Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shigeo Ishikawa; Toshitada Hiraka; Kazukuni Kirii; Masahiro Sugimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Ayako Sugano; Kenichiro Kitabatake; Yuuki Toyoguchi; Masafumi Kanoto; Kenji Nemoto; Tomoyoshi Soga; Masaru Tomita; Mitsuyoshi Iino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  68Ga-FAPI-PET/CT in patients with various gynecological malignancies.

Authors:  Katharina Dendl; Stefan A Koerber; Rebecca Finck; Kgomotso M G Mokoala; Fabian Staudinger; Lisa Schillings; Ulrike Heger; Manuel Röhrich; Clemens Kratochwil; Mike Sathekge; Dirk Jäger; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  A Review of Nuclear Medicine Approaches in the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Nasim Vahidfar; Saeed Farzanefar; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Eóin N Molloy; Elisabeth Eppard
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

10.  Enhanced immune reaction resulting from co-vaccination of WT1 helper peptide assessed on PET-CT.

Authors:  Jun Nakata; Kayako Isohashi; Soyoko Morimoto; Ryota Itou; Takashi Kamiya; Ai Matsuura; Hiroko Nakajima; Fumihiro Fujiki; Sumiyuki Nishida; Yoshiko Hasii; Kana Hasegawa; Shinichi Nakatsuka; Naoki Hosen; Akihiro Tsuboi; Yoshihiro Oka; Atsushi Kumanogoh; Masaru Shibano; Satoru Munakata; Yusuke Oji; Jun Hatazawa; Haruo Sugiyama
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.