| Literature DB >> 28287499 |
Jixiang Dai1, Li Zhu2, Gaopeng Wang3, Feng Xiang4, Yuhuan Qin5, Min Wang6, Minghong Yang7,8.
Abstract
In terms of hydrogen sensing and detection, optical fiber hydrogen sensors have been a research issue due to their intrinsic safety and good anti-electromagnetic interference. Among these sensors, hydrogen sensors consisting of fiber grating coated with sensitive materials have attracted intensive research interests due to their good reliability and distributed measurements. This review paper mainly focuses on optical fiber hydrogen sensors associated with fiber gratings and various materials. Their configurations and sensing performances proposed by different groups worldwide are reviewed, compared and discussed in this paper. Meanwhile, the challenges for fiber grating hydrogen sensors are also addressed.Entities:
Keywords: hydrogen sensor; optical fiber grating; sensitive materials
Year: 2017 PMID: 28287499 PMCID: PMC5375863 DOI: 10.3390/s17030577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Typical structure of a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) hydrogen sensor [12].
Figure 2FBG hydrogen sensor based on a tapered single-mode fiber [18].
Figure 3(a) Side-polished FBG (SPFBG) hydrogen sensor fixed on quartz substrate [27]; (b) Micro-FBG (MFBG) hydrogen sensor based on tapered multimode fiber [28].
Figure 4Typical structure of a long-period fiber grating (LPFG) hydrogen sensor [29].
Figure 5Typical structure of SPFBG hydrogen sensor [31].
Figure 6(a) Configuration of micro-machined FBG hydrogen sensor [34]; (b) SEM of micro-machined FBG coated with Pd/Ag composite film [34].
Figure 7Configuration of double spiral FBG hydrogen sensor [35].
Figure 8Configuration of FBG hydrogen sensor coated with Pt-loaded WO3 coating [43].
Figure 9Configuration of high-low Bragg grating with tip coated with WO3-Pd2Pt-Pt film [47].
Comparison of fiber grating hydrogen sensors based on Pd and Pd alloys.
| Publication Date, Author, Reference | Configuration of Sensing Head, Carrying Gas | Concentration Range, Sensitivity or Wavelength Shift, Response Time, Operating Temperature | Some Important Experimental Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999, Sutapun, [ | 560 nm Pd + etched FBG (35 μm), N2 | 0.3%–1.8%, 22 pm/%, -, room temperature | Poor reversibility (H2 more than 1.8% ( |
| 1999, Tang, [ | 33 μm Pd tube + FBG, N2 | 4%, 1.4 nm, more than 200 min, 23 °C; 4%, about 2 min, 0.6 nm, 95 °C | Ambient temperature can affect sensitivity and response rate of the sensor |
| 2006, Trouillet, [ | 50 nm Pd + LPFG and FBG, N2 | 4%, 14 pm (FBG), −7 nm (LPFG), less than 2 min, room temperature | LPFG has much better sensitivity |
| 2007, Aleixandre, [ | 5 nm Pd + etched FBG (25 μm), N2 | 0.3%–3.0%, 8.4 pm/% ( | Longer response time after several months due to superficial oxidation |
| 2008, Wei, [ | 70 nm Pd + LPFG, He | 4%, −4.3 nm, less than 70 s, 30 °C | Best sensitivity at 30 °C, quicker response rate and lower sensitivity at higher temperatures |
| 2009, Buric, [ | 450 nm Pd + FBG inscribed in 1 cm high attenuation fiber, N2 | 1%–10%, about 37–280 pm, −150 °C (under 1.17-W laser heating) | Greater heating power enables higher sensitivity |
| 2013, Silva, [ | 150 nm Pd + 6 mm FBG inscribed in tapered single-mode fiber SMF (50 μm), N2 | 0.1%–1%, 81.8 pm/%, about 2 min, room temperature | Better sensitivity, without splicing different optical fibers |
| 2014, Dai, [ | 110 nm Pd91Ni9 + 20 μm FBG fixed on polymer substrate, air | 0.5%–4%, about 37 pm/%, 5–6 min, 25 °C | Enhanced sensitivity, superficial oxidation |
| 2015, Jiang, [ | 560 nm Pd/Ag + SPFBG, in transformer oil | 100–700 μL/L, 0.477 pm/(μL/L), within 4 h at room temperature, within 1 h at 60 °C | Sensitivity of SPFBG is 11.4 times higher than that of common FBG |
| 2015, Yu, [ | 15 nm Pd + 3.3 μm MFBG, N2 | −1.08 nm wavelength shift 5%, 60 s, room temperature | Blue wavelength shift, nonlinear response |
| 2015, Karanja, [ | 10 nm Ni + 520 nm Pd75Ag25 + FBG with microgrooves, air | 1%–4%, 5–48 pm, in air, about 60 s, 25 °C; 1%–4%, 50–550 pm, about 50 s, 35 °C | Greatly improved sensitivity at higher temperature |
Comparison of hydrogen sensor based on thermal reaction and gasochromic effect.
| Publication Date, Author, Reference | Configuration of Sensing Head, Carrying Gas | Concentration Range, Sensitivity or Wavelength Shift, Response Time, Operating Temperature | Some Important Experiment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008, Caucheteur, [ | FBG + LPFG, Pt-loaded WO3 coating, air | 0.6%–4%, 1.2–8 nm, 4 s, 25 °C (FBG + 15 dB LPFG) | Humidity and temperature affect threshold; more active energy enable better responsibility |
| 2014, Dai, [ | Temperature sensitive + FBG Pt-loaded WO3 coating, air | 0.02%–0.8%, more than 448 pm; about 2 min, 25 °C. | 315 °C annealed Pt:WO3 = 1:5 has best sensitivity, threshold of 200 ppm at 25 °C |
| 2015, Masuzawa, [ | FBG coated with Pt/SiO2, Pt/WO3, Pt/Fe2O3, Pt/ZnO, Pt/SnO2 and Pt/Al2O3, air and N2 | Pt/SiO2: 0.1%–1% (in air), about 20–480 pm, less than 20 s, room temperature | Pt/SiO2 shows better stability than other materials, poor responsibility in N2 |
| 2015, Yang, [ | High-low reflective FBG with tip coated with WO3-Pd2Pt-Pt film, air | 50–23,900 ppm, 10–30 ppm; 20 s, 25 °C | Better sensitivity at low concentration hydrogen, threshold of 50 ppm |
| 2016, Zhong, [ | Pt-loaded WO3 coating + FBG, air | 1500–20,000 ppm, about 43.5 ppm; 55–80 s, room temperature | Improved stability with ultraviolet irradiation |
Figure 10Comparison of the resolution of fiber grating hydrogen sensors based on Pd-based and WO3-based hydrogen sensitive materials.