| Literature DB >> 28287138 |
A K M Rezaul Haque Chowdhury1, Amirhossein Tavangar2, Bo Tan1, Krishnan Venkatakrishnan2,3.
Abstract
Carbon nanomaterials have been investigated for various biomedical applications. In most cases, however, these nanomaterials must be functionalized biologically or chemically due to their biological inertness or possibleEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28287138 PMCID: PMC5347155 DOI: 10.1038/srep44250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of the laser ionization of graphite substrate and the synthesis of nano-network platform and its corresponding SEM micrographs.
Figure 2The SEM and corresponding FE-SEM micrographs of (A) native graphite substrate and the nano-network platforms created at (B) low (C) medium, and (D) high laser fluence.
Figure 3(A) A comparison of Micro-Raman spectra of native graphite and the nano-network platform synthesized at different laser fluences, (B) the relationships between crystallite size La and ID/IG ratio, and (C) the influence of the laser fluences on the crystallite size La. The ID/IG ratio is recorded from the Micro-Raman spectra, and it is used to calculate crystallite size La using Equation 1.
Crystallite size (La) calculation using Equation 1 and the Id and Ig intensities from Micro-Raman spectra of nano-network platforms developed at different fluences.
| Id | Ig | Id/Ig | λ | La | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 6339.16 | 8913.18 | 0.71 | 532 | 27.01 |
| Medium | 6549.79 | 8342.73 | 0.79 | 532 | 24.85 |
| High | 5975.28 | 7412.35 | 0.81 | 532 | 23.89 |
Figure 4XPS spectra of (A) native graphite substrate and (B) the nano-network platform; (C) XPS quantitative analysis of major elements on both untreated graphite substrate and the nano-network platform created at high fluence.
Figure 5(A) FSEM-EDX elemental mapping of the created nano-network platforms at different laser fluences and their corresponding oxygen (O) and Carbon (C) spectra; (B) Comparison of XRD patterns of native graphite substrate and the nano-network platform indicating the presence of standard crystalline nano-graphite pattern as of native graphite except the peak at 2θ ≈ 32 which is associated to crystalline carbon (C-00-046-0943).
Figure 6Schematic of native graphite and the nano-network platforms fabricated at different laser fluences and the corresponding SEM micrographs of the substrates before and after fibroblast response after 24 h.
(Graphics of the Petri dish and the cells were adapted from Servier Medical Art - creativecommons.org).
Figure 7SEM micrographs of fibroblasts adhered on (A) native graphite and (B–D) the nano-network platforms created at low, medium and high fluences, respectively; corresponding fluorescence microscopy images of (E–G) nano-network platforms created at low, medium and high fluence, respectively after 24 h of culture; and SEM micrographs of fibroblasts cultured on (H-J) low, medium and high fluence mediated nano-network, respectively, after 48 h.
Figure 8Quantitative analysis of the number of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts adhered on the untreated graphite substrate and the nano-network platforms created at different fluences.
Figure 9SEM micrographs of the fibroblast cells adhered on low, medium and high fluence mediated nano-network platforms, respectively, after (A–C) 24 h and (D–F) 48 h of culture.
Figure 10Fluorescence microscopy images and quantitative analysis of the surface area of the nucleus of fibroblasts attached on the platforms created at (A) low (B) medium, and (C) high laser fluence.