Literature DB >> 35927565

Influence of the properties of different graphene-based nanomaterials dispersed in polycaprolactone membranes on astrocytic differentiation.

Marián Mantecón-Oria1,2, Olga Tapia3,4, Miguel Lafarga2,4,5, María T Berciano2,4,6, Jose M Munuera7, Silvia Villar-Rodil7, Juan I Paredes7, María J Rivero1, Nazely Diban8,9, Ane Urtiaga1,2.   

Abstract

Composites of polymer and graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) combine easy processing onto porous 3D membrane geometries due to the polymer and cellular differentiation stimuli due to GBNs fillers. Aiming to step forward to the clinical application of polymer/GBNs composites, this study performs a systematic and detailed comparative analysis of the influence of the properties of four different GBNs: (i) graphene oxide obtained from graphite chemically processes (GO); (ii) reduced graphene oxide (rGO); (iii) multilayered graphene produced by mechanical exfoliation method (Gmec); and (iv) low-oxidized graphene via anodic exfoliation (Ganodic); dispersed in polycaprolactone (PCL) porous membranes to induce astrocytic differentiation. PCL/GBN flat membranes were fabricated by phase inversion technique and broadly characterized in morphology and topography, chemical structure, hydrophilicity, protein adsorption, and electrical properties. Cellular assays with rat C6 glioma cells, as model for cell-specific astrocytes, were performed. Remarkably, low GBN loading (0.67 wt%) caused an important difference in the response of the C6 differentiation among PCL/GBN membranes. PCL/rGO and PCL/GO membranes presented the highest biomolecule markers for astrocyte differentiation. Our results pointed to the chemical structural defects in rGO and GO nanomaterials and the protein adsorption mechanisms as the most plausible cause conferring distinctive properties to PCL/GBN membranes for the promotion of astrocytic differentiation. Overall, our systematic comparative study provides generalizable conclusions and new evidences to discern the role of GBNs features for future research on 3D PCL/graphene composite hollow fiber membranes for in vitro neural models.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927565      PMCID: PMC9352708          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17697-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  59 in total

1.  Creation of a Hybrid Scaffold with Dual Configuration of Aligned and Random Electrospun Fibers.

Authors:  Suk-Hee Park; Min Sung Kim; Byungjun Lee; Jean Ho Park; Hye Jin Lee; Nak Kyu Lee; Noo Li Jeon; Kahp-Yang Suh
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.229

2.  A three-dimensional nerve guide conduit based on graphene foam/polycaprolactone.

Authors:  Neda Bahremandi Tolou; Hamidreza Salimijazi; Mahshid Kharaziha; Giuliana Faggio; Rosa Chierchia; Nicola Lisi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  The promotion of neurite sprouting and outgrowth of mouse hippocampal cells in culture by graphene substrates.

Authors:  Ning Li; Xuemin Zhang; Qin Song; Ruigong Su; Qi Zhang; Tao Kong; Liwei Liu; Gang Jin; Mingliang Tang; Guosheng Cheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Astrocytes: biology and pathology.

Authors:  Michael V Sofroniew; Harry V Vinters
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Graphene Oxide Upregulates the Homeostatic Functions of Primary Astrocytes and Modulates Astrocyte-to-Neuron Communication.

Authors:  Martina Chiacchiaretta; Mattia Bramini; Anna Rocchi; Andrea Armirotti; Emanuele Giordano; Ester Vázquez; Tiziano Bandiera; Stefano Ferroni; Fabrizia Cesca; Fabio Benfenati
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Reversible pH Responsive Bovine Serum Albumin Hydrogel Sponge Nanolayer.

Authors:  Vikram Singh Raghuwanshi; Brendan Yu; Christine Browne; Gil Garnier
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 7.  Methodological limitations in determining astrocytic gene expression.

Authors:  Liang Peng; Chuang Guo; Tao Wang; Baoman Li; Li Gu; Zhanyou Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  In vitro Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier: Tools in Translational Medicine.

Authors:  Alberto Williams-Medina; Michael Deblock; Damir Janigro
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.