| Literature DB >> 28286916 |
Volker Musahl1, Alan Getgood2, Philippe Neyret3, Steven Claes4, Jeremy M Burnham5, Cecile Batailler3, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet6, Andy Williams7, Andrew Amis8, Stefano Zaffagnini9, Jón Karlsson10.
Abstract
Persistent rotatory knee laxity is increasingly recognized as a common finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While the reasons behind rotator knee laxity are multifactorial, the impact of the anterolateral knee structures is significant. As such, substantial focus has been directed toward better understanding these structures, including their anatomy, biomechanics, in vivo function, injury patterns, and the ideal procedures with which to address any rotatory knee laxity that results from damage to these structures. However, the complexity of lateral knee anatomy, varying dissection techniques, differing specimen preparation methods, inconsistent sectioning techniques in biomechanical studies, and confusing terminology have led to discrepancies in published studies on the topic. Furthermore, anatomical and functional descriptions have varied widely. As such, we have assembled a panel of expert surgeons and scientists to discuss the roles of the anterolateral structures in rotatory knee laxity, the healing potential of these structures, the most appropriate procedures to address rotatory knee laxity, and the indications for these procedures. In this round table discussion, KSSTA Editor-in-Chief Professor Jón Karlsson poses a variety of relevant and timely questions, and experts from around the world provide answers based on their personal experiences, scientific study, and interpretations of the literature. Level of evidence V.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; Alc; All; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterolateral complex; Anterolateral ligament; Extra-articular tenodesis; Instability; Laxity; Meniscus; Pivot shift; Reconstruction; Revision acl; Rotatory
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28286916 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4436-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342