Literature DB >> 35980541

Clinical outcomes and return to sport after single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by bone-patellar tendon autograft combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

Luigi Zanna1, Giabbani Niccolò2, Innocenti Matteo2, Joseph Malone3, Civinini Roberto2, Matassi Fabrizio2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure rate continues to increase. Involvement of a young population with a desire to return to sport, explains the increased need for ACLR (revACLR) revision. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome, complications, failure rate and return to sport of a single-stage revACLR using bone patellar tendon-bone (BTBT) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revACLR. Knee stability was assessed by Lachman and Pivot shift test. Objective anterior laxity was determined by KT-2000 arthrometer. The IKDC subjective, Lysholm, ACL-RSI Scores, level of sport activity and Forgotten Joint Score-12 were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 36 patients, we collected data from 17 who underwent single-stage revACLR with autologous BTBT combined with LET, performed using an extra-articular MacIntosh procedure as modified by Arnold-Coker. The side-to-side difference in Lachman test and Pivot shift test significantly improved postoperatively. The subjective IKDC, Lysholm and ACL-RSI significantly improved from 71.4 ± 9.03 to 92 ± 6.9, from 58.3 ± 19.3 to 66.8 ± 27.7 and from 50.4 ± 12.2 to 68.6 ± 24.5, respectively during the post-operative follow-up. Ten patients (58.8%) returned to their desired level of sport. One patient was considered a failure because of the postoperative laxity.
CONCLUSION: Single-stage revACLR with BPTB combined with LET is a safe procedure that shows good objective and subjective outcomes, and a high rate of return to the same level of sport. Reducing rotational instability and strain on intra-articular reconstructed structures results in a low rate of complications and failure.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Bone patellar tendon bone; Lateral extra-articular tenodesis; Revision ACLR; Single-stage revision

Year:  2022        PMID: 35980541     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03352-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  29 in total

Review 1.  Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sue D Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores.

Authors:  David J Biau; Caroline Tournoux; Sandrine Katsahian; Peter Schranz; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Post-operative 3D CT feedback improves accuracy and precision in the learning curve of anatomic ACL femoral tunnel placement.

Authors:  Luigi Sirleo; Massimo Innocenti; Matteo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effect of Delayed Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Medial Compartment Cartilage and Meniscal Health.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; J Caid Kirven; Moneer M Abouljoud; Alex C DiBartola; Christopher C Kaeding; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Christopher Kim; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Experience With 91 Patients (40 Elite Athletes) Using an Algorithm.

Authors:  Nathan P White; Kyle A Borque; Mary H Jones; Andy Williams
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: indications, review, and technique demonstration.

Authors:  Aaron C Coats; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings and Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Study.

Authors:  Andrea Redler; Raffaele Iorio; Edoardo Monaco; Francesco Puglia; Megan R Wolf; Daniele Mazza; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Knee central pivot bicruciate avulsion and proximal anterior cruciate ligament tear primary repair: A rare case report.

Authors:  Luigi Zanna; Armando Del Prete; Giovanni Benelli; Luca Turelli
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-09

10.  Partial rupture of anterior cruciate ligament: preliminary experience of selective reconstruction.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Matteo Innocenti; Giuliana Roselli; Luigi Sirleo; Fabrizio Matassi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.