| Literature DB >> 28286496 |
Katy Hoffmann1, Christiane Hassenrück2, Verena Salman-Carvalho1, Moritz Holtappels3, Christina Bienhold1.
Abstract
Benthic deep-sea communities are largely dependent on particle flux from surface waters. In the Arctic Ocean, environmental changes occur more rapidly than in other ocean regions, and have major effects on the export of organic matter to the deep sea. Because bacteria constitute the majority of deep-sea benthic biomass and influence global element cycles, it is important to better understand how changes in organic matter input will affect bacterial communities at the Arctic seafloor. In a multidisciplinary ex situ experiment, benthic bacterial deep-sea communities from the Long-Term Ecological Research Observatory HAUSGARTEN were supplemented with different types of habitat-related detritus (chitin, Arctic algae) and incubated for 23 days under in situ conditions. Chitin addition caused strong changes in community activity, while community structure remained similar to unfed control incubations. In contrast, the addition of phytodetritus resulted in strong changes in community composition, accompanied by increased community activity, indicating the need for adaptation in these treatments. High-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and 16S rRNA revealed distinct taxonomic groups of potentially fast-growing, opportunistic bacteria in the different detritus treatments. Compared to the unfed control, Colwelliaceae, Psychromonadaceae, and Oceanospirillaceae increased in relative abundance in the chitin treatment, whereas Flavobacteriaceae, Marinilabiaceae, and Pseudoalteromonadaceae increased in the phytodetritus treatments. Hence, these groups may constitute indicator taxa for the different organic matter sources at this study site. In summary, differences in community structure and in the uptake and remineralization of carbon in the different treatments suggest an effect of organic matter quality on bacterial diversity as well as on carbon turnover at the seafloor, an important feedback mechanism to be considered in future climate change scenarios.Entities:
Keywords: 16S Illumina sequencing; Arctic algae; climate change; food pulse experiment; opportunistic bacteria; surface sediment
Year: 2017 PMID: 28286496 PMCID: PMC5323390 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Carbon utilization in the different treatments at atmospheric pressure.
| Treatment | Cell abundance [×109 cells mL-1] | Cell biomass [μmol C mL-1]a | Stimulated net bacterial biomass yield [μmol C ml-1]b | C assimilation into biomass [% of added C]c | O2 uptake in 23 days [μmol O2 mL-1] | Net C respiration in 23 days [μmol C mL-1]d | Net C respired in 23 days [% of added C]e | Total C used in 23 days (respired + assimilated) [μmol mL-1]f | Total C used [% of added carbon]g | Bacterial growth efficiency [%]h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| day0 | unfed | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | ||||||||
| CHI | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | |||||||||
| TWEI | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | |||||||||
| EHUX | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | |||||||||
| BCLA | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | |||||||||
| MARC | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | |||||||||
| day23 | unfed | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.3 | n/a | n/a | 2.9 ± 0.1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| CHI | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 17.0 ± 2.3 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 18.7 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 36.0 ± 2.3 | 47.2 ± 3.3 | |
| TWEI | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 11.9 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 23.8 ± 4.6 | |
| EHUX | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 2.5 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 10.6 ± 0.6 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 15.3 ± 2.0 | 27.0 ± 13.7 | |
| BCLA | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 4.7 ± 0.0 | 1.8 ± 0.0 | 10.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 12.7 ± 0.9 | 18.6 ± 5.5 | |
| MARC | 2.8 ± n/a | 4.6 ± n/a | 1.1 ± n/a | 6.5 ± n/a | 4.4 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.0 | 8.7 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± n/a | 15.1 ± n/a | 42.8 ± n/a |
Alpha diversity indices of the bacterial community in the incubation experiment.
| nOTUs | invS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Value | Tukey HSD | Value | Tukey HSD | |
| day0 | 5,777 ± 56 | a | 359 ± 28 | a | |
| unfed | 5,113 ± 54 | a | 193 ± 22 | b | |
| CHI | 3,479 ± 359 | b | 56 ± 8 | c | |
| TWEI | 1,323 ± 95 | c | 26 ± 0 | d | |
| EHUX | 1,786 ± 44 | d | 25 ± 10 | d | |
| BCLA | 1,686 ± 286 | d | 35 ± 1 | e | |
| MARC | 1,922 ± 131 | d | 38 ± 2 | e | |
| day0 | 7,816 | NA | 1,230 | NA | |
| unfed | 2,767 | NA | 45 | NA | |
| CHI | 4,602 | NA | 67 | NA | |
| TWEI | 2,362 | NA | 32 | NA | |
| EHUX | 2,358 | NA | 34 | NA | |
| BCLA | 2,498 | NA | 34 | NA | |
| MARC | NA | NA | NA | NA | |