Literature DB >> 28284877

Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: A retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997-2009).

Caroline Se Homer1, Nicky Leap2, Nadine Edwards3, Jane Sandall4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: in 1997, The Albany Midwifery Practice was established within King's College Hospital NHS Trust in a South East London area of high social disadvantage. The Albany midwives provided continuity of care to around 216 women per year, including those with obstetric, medical or social risk factors. In 2009, the Albany Midwifery Practice was closed in response to concerns about safety, amidst much publicity and controversy. The aim of this evaluation was to examine trends and outcomes for all mothers and babies who received care from the practice from 1997-2009.
DESIGN: a retrospective, descriptive analysis of data routinely collected over the 12.5 year period was undertaken including changes over time and outcomes by demographic features. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all women booked with the Albany Midwifery Practice were included.
FINDINGS: of the 2568 women included over the 12.5 year period, more than half (57%) were from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities; one third were single and 11.4% reported being single and unsupported. Almost all women (95.5%) were cared for in labour by either their primary or secondary midwife. There were high rates of spontaneous onset of labour (80.5%), spontaneous vaginal birth (79.8%), homebirth (43.5%), initiation of breastfeeding (91.5%) and breastfeeding at 28 days (74.3% exclusively and 14.8% mixed feeding). Of the 79% of women who had a physiological third stage, 5.9% had a postpartum haemorrhage. The overall rate of caesarean section was 16%. The preterm birth rate was low (5%). Ninety-five per cent of babies had an Apgar score of 8 or greater at 5minutes and 6% were admitted to a neonatal unit for more than two days. There were 15 perinatal deaths (perinatal mortality rate of 5.78 per 1000 births); two were associated with significant congenital abnormalities. There were no intrapartum intrauterine deaths. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: this analysis has shown that the Albany Midwifery Practice demonstrated positive outcomes for women and babies in socially disadvantaged and BAME groups, including those with complex pregnancies and perceived risk factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: consideration should be given to making similar models of care available to all women.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albany Midwifery Practice; BAME outcomes; Caseload midwifery; Home birth; Midwifery continuity of carer; Midwifery practice; Midwives; Normal birth; Social disadvantage

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28284877     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  11 in total

1.  Giving birth in rural Arctic Greenland results from an Eastern Greenlandic birth cohort.

Authors:  Susanne Houd; Hans Christian Florian Sørensen; Jette Aaroe Clausen; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.941

2.  The key components of a successful model of midwifery-led continuity of carer, without continuity at birth: findings from a qualitative implementation evaluation.

Authors:  N Dharni; H Essex; M J Bryant; A Cronin de Chavez; K Willan; D Farrar; T Bywater; J Dickerson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Relationship between obesity and lower rates of breast feeding initiation in regional Victoria, Australia: an 8-year retrospective panel study.

Authors:  Melanie Rae Bish; Fiona Faulks; Lisa Helen Amir; Rachel R Huxley; Harold David McIntyre; Rachel James; George Mnatzaganian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Kathryn Dalrymple; James Harris; Angela Harden; Elidh Parslow; Thomas Georgi; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The public health role of caseloading midwives in advancing health equity in childbearing women and babies living in socially deprived areas in England: The Mi-CARE Study protocol.

Authors:  Charlotte E Clayton; Ann Hemingway; Mel Hughes; Stella Rawnson
Journal:  Eur J Midwifery       Date:  2022-04-04

6.  Better maternity care pathways in pregnancies after stillbirth or neonatal death: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Tracey A Mills; Stephen A Roberts; Elizabeth Camacho; Alexander E P Heazell; Rachael N Massey; Cathie Melvin; Rachel Newport; Debbie M Smith; Claire O Storey; Wendy Taylor; Tina Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Sergio A Silverio; James Harris; Angela Harden; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; James Harris; Angela Harden; Zahra Khan; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 9.  Sustaining quality midwifery care in a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Mary J Renfrew; Helen Cheyne; Justine Craig; Elizabeth Duff; Fiona Dykes; Billie Hunter; Tina Lavender; Lesley Page; Mary Ross-Davie; Helen Spiby; Soo Downe
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Can birth outcome inequality be reduced using targeted caseload midwifery in a deprived diverse inner city population? A retrospective cohort study, London, UK.

Authors:  Ruth Hadebe; Paul T Seed; Diana Essien; Kyle Headen; Saheel Mahmud; Salwa Owasil; Cristina Fernandez Turienzo; Carla Stanke; Jane Sandall; Mara Bruno; Nina Khazaezadeh; Eugene Oteng-Ntim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.