Literature DB >> 28283750

The effects of simulating a realistic eye model on the eye dose of an adult male undergoing head computed tomography.

Parisa Akhlaghi1, Atiyeh Ebrahimi-Khankook2, Alireza Vejdani-Noghreiyan2.   

Abstract

In head computed tomography, radiation upon the eye lens (as an organ with high radiosensitivity) may cause lenticular opacity and cataracts. Therefore, quantitative dose assessment due to exposure of the eye lens and surrounding tissue is a matter of concern. For this purpose, an accurate eye model with realistic geometry and shape, in which different eye substructures are considered, is needed. To calculate the absorbed radiation dose of visual organs during head computed tomography scans, in this study, an existing sophisticated eye model was inserted at the related location in the head of the reference adult male phantom recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Then absorbed doses and distributions of energy deposition in different parts of this eye model were calculated and compared with those based on a previous simple eye model. All calculations were done using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4C for tube voltages of 80, 100, 120 and 140 kVp. In spite of the similarity of total dose to the eye lens for both eye models, the dose delivered to the sensitive zone, which plays an important role in the induction of cataracts, was on average 3% higher for the sophisticated model as compared to the simple model. By increasing the tube voltage, differences between the total dose to the eye lens between the two phantoms decrease to 1%. Due to this level of agreement, use of the sophisticated eye model for patient dosimetry is not necessary. However, it still helps for an estimation of doses received by different eye substructures separately.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult male phantom; Cataract; Computed tomography; Eye lens; Monte Carlo simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28283750     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-017-0686-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  29 in total

1.  Dosimetry characterization of a 32P source wire used for intravascular brachytherapy with automated stepping.

Authors:  Firas Mourtada; Christopher G Soares; Stephen M Seltzer; Paul M Bergstrom; José M Fernández-Verea; José Asenjo; Sam H Lott
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  ICRP Publication 116. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures.

Authors:  N Petoussi-Henss; W E Bolch; K F Eckerman; A Endo; N Hertel; J Hunt; M Pelliccioni; H Schlattl; M Zankl
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2010 Apr-Oct

3.  Dose conversion coefficients for photon exposure of the human eye lens.

Authors:  R Behrens; G Dietze
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Lens exposure during brain scans using multidetector row CT scanners: methods for estimation of lens dose.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; T Ishitake; T Abe; H Machida; R Takei; K Ibukuro; A Watanabe; T Kidouchi; Y Nakano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Daniel Long; Ryan Fisher; Chris Tien; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Awais Vance
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Daniel J Long; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Gabriel Chodick; Nural Bekiroglu; Michael Hauptmann; Bruce H Alexander; D Michal Freedman; Michele Morin Doody; Li C Cheung; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; André Bouville; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Cataract in atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  A Minamoto; H Taniguchi; N Yoshitani; S Mukai; T Yokoyama; T Kumagami; Y Tsuda; H K Mishima; T Amemiya; E Nakashima; K Neriishi; A Hida; S Fujiwara; G Suzuki; M Akahoshi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison between realistic ocular model and other models for COMS plaque brachytherapy with 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I radioisotopes.

Authors:  Atiyeh Ebrahimi-Khankook; Alireza Vejdani-Noghreiyan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 1.925

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.