M Scharitzer1, D Tamandl2, A Ba-Ssalamah2. 1. Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. martina.scharitzer@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.
Abstract
CLINICAL ISSUE: Besides the upper abdominal parenchymal organs, the increasing application of cross-sectional imaging has also led to a rising number of incidental findings in the kidneys, adrenal glands, adnexa uteri, the gastrointestinal tract, mesentery and abdominal lymph nodes. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography investigations often show unexpected findings without any correlating symptoms. The growing clinical relevance is due to the large number of incidental findings as well as an increasing awareness of ethical and socioeconomic factors. ACHIEVEMENTS: When interpreting radiological findings not only morphological criteria but also individual risk factors of the patient and the clinical context are of great importance. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The aims of this article are the description and evaluation of frequent incidental findings detected by computed tomography and to provide information about management recommendations.
CLINICAL ISSUE: Besides the upper abdominal parenchymal organs, the increasing application of cross-sectional imaging has also led to a rising number of incidental findings in the kidneys, adrenal glands, adnexa uteri, the gastrointestinal tract, mesentery and abdominal lymph nodes. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography investigations often show unexpected findings without any correlating symptoms. The growing clinical relevance is due to the large number of incidental findings as well as an increasing awareness of ethical and socioeconomic factors. ACHIEVEMENTS: When interpreting radiological findings not only morphological criteria but also individual risk factors of the patient and the clinical context are of great importance. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The aims of this article are the description and evaluation of frequent incidental findings detected by computed tomography and to provide information about management recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Case management; Clinical total concept; Morphological criteria; Radiological interpretation; Risk factors
Authors: Michael E Zalis; Matthew A Barish; J Richard Choi; Abraham H Dachman; Helen M Fenlon; Joseph T Ferrucci; Seth N Glick; Andrea Laghi; Michael Macari; Elizabeth G McFarland; Martina M Morrin; Perry J Pickhardt; Jorge Soto; Judy Yee Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lincoln L Berland; Stuart G Silverman; Richard M Gore; William W Mayo-Smith; Alec J Megibow; Judy Yee; James A Brink; Mark E Baker; Michael P Federle; W Dennis Foley; Isaac R Francis; Brian R Herts; Gary M Israel; Glenn Krinsky; Joel F Platt; William P Shuman; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Susan C Modesitt; Edward J Pavlik; Frederick R Ueland; Paul D DePriest; R J Kryscio; J R van Nagell Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.661