Literature DB >> 28283033

Resting and feeding preferences of Anopheles stephensi in an urban setting, perennial for malaria.

Shalu Thomas1, Sangamithra Ravishankaran1, N A Johnson Amala Justin1, Aswin Asokan1, Manu Thomas Mathai2, Neena Valecha3, Jacqui Montgomery4, Matthew B Thomas4, Alex Eapen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Indian city of Chennai is endemic for malaria and the known local malaria vector is Anopheles stephensi. Plasmodium vivax is the predominant malaria parasite species, though Plasmodium falciparum is present at low levels. The urban ecotype of malaria prevails in Chennai with perennial transmission despite vector surveillance by the Urban Malaria Scheme (UMS) of the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP). Understanding the feeding and resting preferences, together with the transmission potential of adult vectors in the area is essential in effective planning and execution of improved vector control measures.
METHODS: A yearlong survey was carried out in cattle sheds and human dwellings to check the resting, feeding preferences and transmission potential of An. stephensi. The gonotrophic status, age structure, resting and host seeking preferences were studied. The infection rate in An. stephensi and Anopheles subpictus were analysed by circumsporozoite ELISA (CS-ELISA).
RESULTS: Adult vectors were found more frequently and at higher densities in cattle sheds than human dwellings. The overall Human Blood Index (HBI) was 0.009 indicating the vectors to be strongly zoophilic. Among the vectors collected from human dwellings, 94.2% were from thatched structures and the remaining 5.8% from tiled and asbestos structures. 57.75% of the dissected vectors were nulliparous whereas, 35.83% were monoparous and the rest 6.42% biparous. Sporozoite positivity rate was 0.55% (4/720) and 1.92% (1/52) for An. stephensi collected from cattle sheds and human dwellings, respectively. One adult An. subpictus (1/155) was also found to be infected with P. falciparum.
CONCLUSIONS: Control of the adult vector populations can be successful only by understanding the resting and feeding preferences. The present study indicates that adult vectors predominantly feed on cattle and cattle sheds are the preferred resting place, possibly due to easy availability of blood meal source and lack of any insecticide or repellent pressure. Hence targeting these resting sites with cost effective, socially acceptable intervention tools, together with effective larval source management to reduce vector breeding, could provide an improved integrated vector management strategy to help drive down malaria transmission and assist in India's plan to eliminate malaria by 2030.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles stephensi; Blood meal analysis; Parity; Urban malaria; Vector control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28283033      PMCID: PMC5346253          DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1764-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malar J        ISSN: 1475-2875            Impact factor:   2.979


Background

Various factors like host preference, resting and feeding behaviour, adult longevity and density, human biting rate and host location strategy influence the role of mosquitoes in malaria transmission [1]. The state of Tamil Nadu had 8714 malaria cases in 2014, of which 337 (3.86%) were Plasmodium falciparum and the remaining 8377 (96.13%) P. vivax [2]. Almost 70% of the malaria cases recorded in Tamil Nadu occur in Chennai [3]. Malaria is endemic in Chennai, transmitted by the urban vector, Anopheles stephensi, which breeds predominantly in overhead tanks besides, other water storage habitats [4], and lesser examined rain fed clear water habitats. The transmission is unstable, but perennial with seasonal peaks mainly in July to August and then from October to November [5]. The present study was done as a part of the project on ‘Center for the Study of Complex Malaria in India’ (CSCMi) where transmission dynamics (micro environmental profile, immature and adult vector density, host, resting and breeding preferences of the vector mosquitoes) and eco-epidemiology of malaria (clinic study to investigate the impact of complex malaria on disease outcome in symptomatic individuals and community study to determine the incidence and prevalence rate of complex malaria including asymptomatic malaria) in urban transmission settings [6]. The main objective of this study was to find the feeding and resting preferences of An. stephensi and its transmission potential in a malaria endemic area of Chennai with perennial transmission.

Methods

Adult vector collections

The study site, Besant Nagar (13.0002°N, 80.2668°E) is a residential area with slums adjacent to the seashore in the southeastern part of Chennai; it is distinctly characterized by its meso-endemic perennial transmission of malaria, predominantly P. vivax, by the Asiatic urban malaria vector, An. stephensi. Human dwellings (tiled, asbestos and thatched houses) and cattle sheds were surveyed from January to December 2014 in order to find the resting and feeding preferences besides, infectivity rate of the primary vector, An. stephensi. The study site indicating cattle sheds were georeferenced and human dwelling collection sites along with malaria incidence of 2014 is represented in Fig. 1. Cattle sheds were classified according to type of roof structures such as asbestos, thatched and concrete, visited on two consecutive days in a fortnight in the dusk during the study period using flashlight and a mouth aspirator (Table 1). A total of 17 cattle sheds were selected for yearlong survey. However, six were surveyed on regular basis (66.1% of total surveys), while other sheds were surveyed randomly (33.9% of total surveys) depending on the availability and accessibility to survey. In each cattle shed, 15–30 min were spent depending on the size/area of the cattle shed and presence or absence of mosquitoes at the time of collection. The fortnightly man hour density (MHD) is plotted against malaria incidence data of 2014, obtained from the Regional Office for Health and Family Welfare (ROH & FW), Besant Nagar, Chennai and corresponding temperature and relative humidity (using Onset HOBO data logger–U10-003) from a longitudinal temperature study carried out in parallel (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Study site with GPS plots of cattle sheds, human dwellings and malaria incidence of 2013–2014

Table 1

Anopheles stephensi collections from varied structure types of cattle sheds (by IRC) and human dwellings (by PSC)

Resting habitatsRoof typesNo. of times surveyedNo. of times positive for resting habitats with Anopheles stephensi n (%)No. of Anopheles stephensi collectedAbdominal conditions
UnfedFreshly fedLate stage fedSemi gravidGravid
Cattle sheds (n = 17)b Asbestos (n = 6)7946 (58.2)47434303712415
Concrete (n = 7)4614 (30.4)75336810
Thatched (n = 3)3814 (36.8)962566203
Rooflessa (n = 1)2010 (50.0)983761225
Human dwellings (n = 245)c Tiled (n = 6)61 (16.7)200002
Thatched (n = 188)18828 (14.9)495023912
Asbestos (n = 51)511 (2.0)110000

aOpen with concrete wall

bSampling repeated

cOne time survey

Fig. 2

Man hour density of Anopheles stephensi with temperature, relative humidity and malaria incidence in Besant Nagar, Chennai for 2014

Study site with GPS plots of cattle sheds, human dwellings and malaria incidence of 2013–2014 Anopheles stephensi collections from varied structure types of cattle sheds (by IRC) and human dwellings (by PSC) aOpen with concrete wall bSampling repeated cOne time survey Man hour density of Anopheles stephensi with temperature, relative humidity and malaria incidence in Besant Nagar, Chennai for 2014 In addition, Pyrethrum spray sheet collections (PSC) were done in human dwellings with different roof types such as thatched, asbestos, and tiled, randomly selected in and around the malaria endemic area of about 3.5 km north–south and 2.5 km east–west direction [4]. They were surveyed on weekly basis to check the presence of resting adult vector mosquitoes, if any. Attempts were made to collect vector mosquitoes in concrete structures too. Since Anopheles mosquitoes were not observed, collections were focused on thatched, asbestos and tiled structures only. The collections were done during dawn (6.00–7.30 a.m.) in five to seven houses, spending 20–30 min for each house on every occasion. Indoor resting collections (IRC) were also performed with the help of mouth aspirator and flashlight, though it was not successful due to sparse sample count (Table 1). A few Anopheles subpictus specimens, caught during the fortnight collections were also screened to determine the presence of malaria parasites.

Abdominal condition, age structure, host seeking preferences and infectivity

The collected mosquitoes were identified to the species level following standard identification keys [7, 8], females enumerated and graded based on their abdominal conditions. The late stage fed, gravid and/or semi-gravid appearance of the abdomen were considered as resting stages, while the unfed guts and/or freshly fed as feeding stages [9]. The fortnight man-hour density (MHD) of An. stephensi was calculated by dividing the total number of female mosquitoes collected by total time spent for a particular fortnight for 1 h period i.e., (Total female An. stephensi collected/Total time spent) ×60. Out of 634 (late stage fed and freshly fed mosquitoes together), 548 i.e., 86.4% (Table 1) were processed for blood meal analysis. After smearing the blood from the abdomen of female mosquitoes on Whatman filter paper (No. 1), the head and thorax of the mosquitoes were processed for circumsporozoite sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following the Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center (MR4) protocol [10]. The dried blood spots were analysed by counter-current immunoelectrophoresis method [11]. A proportion of unfed and gravid females were immediately screened for the presence of sporozoite by dissecting the salivary glands and midguts for oocysts and the age structure or parity (gonotrophic status) of the vector population was ascertained by dissecting the ovaries and examining the tracheoles. All the dissections were done following the standard MR4 protocols [12]. The remaining unfed and gravid females were also processed for CS-ELISA.

Results

The adult vectors (An. stephensi) were predominantly found resting in cattle sheds that were in close proximity (<5 metres distance and often with shared walls) to human dwellings. Fewer mosquitoes (both in terms of absolute numbers and frequency of structure types found positive) were collected from human dwellings. The adult vector density was relatively stable across the year, though with a maximum count observed during the first fortnight of June. Mosquitoes were found in all types of cattle sheds (i.e., whether they were asbestos structures, concrete, thatched, or roofless sites with concrete walls). On the other hand, in 245 surveys of human dwellings, anopheline mosquitoes were rarely found and these tended to be encountered in thatched structures as opposed to tiled or asbestos structures. Among 882 Anopheles specimens collected from cattle sheds, 743 (84.2%) were An. stephensi (all female) and the remaining 139 (15.8%) were An. subpictus and Anopheles vagus. Out of 94 Anopheles species collected from human dwellings, 52 (55.3%) were An. stephensi, 41 (43.6%) An. subpictus and 1 (1.1%) An. vagus. 49 (94.23%) of the An. stephensi collected were from thatched structures followed by 2 (3.85%) from tiled structures and the remaining 1 (1.92%) from asbestos roofed house. When the abdominal conditions of the vector mosquitoes collected were examined, it was found that, among the mosquitoes collected from cattle sheds, 5.7% were unfed, 6% freshly fed, 76.2% of late-fed stage, 9% semi-gravid and the rest 3.1% gravid. Interestingly, 88.3% of the vectors found to be resting were late stage fed, semi gravid and gravid stages, while 11.7% were feeding stages (unfed and freshly fed). Similarly in human dwellings, 88.5% were late stage fed, semi gravid and gravid, while 11.5% were feeding stages. The freshly fed females were collected while they were feeding on cattle. The resting stage of vector mosquitoes were 7.5 times more than the feeding stages.

Host-seeking preference of vector mosquitoes

Blood meal analysis was done using counter-current immunoelectrophoresis technique and the results are depicted in Table 2. Among the vector mosquitoes collected during 2014, 530 mosquitoes from cattle sheds and 18 from human dwellings were analysed for origin of their blood meal. Of 548 samples, 518 (94.5%) had bovine blood meal while only five were positive for human blood (four from human dwellings). Blood meal origin of 25 samples was unknown and the Human Blood Index (HBI) was 0.009. In contrast, Bovine Blood Index (BBI) was 0.95.
Table 2

Host seeking preference, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infectivity of Anopheles stephensi

Resting habitatsHost seeking preferenceProportion of infectivity
No. of samples analysedBovineHumanMixedUnknownNo. of samples analysed Pv 210 n (%) Pv 247 n (%) Pf n (%)
Cattle sheds53051810117203 (0.4)0 (0.0)1 (0.1)
Human dwellings1804014521 (1.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Total54851850257724 (0.5)0 (0.0)1 (0.1)
Host seeking preference, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infectivity of Anopheles stephensi

Age structure and malaria parasite infection in vector mosquitoes

About 200 females were dissected to check the presence of oocysts and sporozoites besides, age structure. None of them were found to harbor oocysts and sporozoite infections. Further, when the parity was checked, 57.75% of the dissected vectors were nulliparous, whereas, 35.83% were monoparous and 6.42% biparous. Cattle shed and household mosquito samples were processed for sporozoite detection by CS-ELISA and the results are shown in Table 2. A total of 772 samples collected during 2014 (720 from cattle sheds and 52 from households) were analysed for vector incrimination. Of these, five were found to be infected with the malaria parasites (four P. vivax 210 infected—three from cattle sheds and one from human dwelling) and one P. falciparum infected (collected from cattle shed). Sporozoite positivity rate was 0.648 and 1.92% of An. stephensi collected from human dwellings were infected. The P. falciparum infected mosquito sample was collected during February 2014 whereas, P. vivax infected samples were obtained during October, November and December. However, P. vivax infected sample from human dwelling was collected during March 2014. Furthermore, 135 An. subpictus samples collected during the study period were subjected to vector incrimination using CS-ELISA and one P. falciparum infection was detected.

Discussion

In the present study, vectors were more abundant in outdoor structures (cattle sheds) than human dwellings. Wherever mosquitoes were found indoors, there appeared to be a preference for thatched structures, possibly due to the availability of eaves and crevices, which provide suitable/preferential hideouts and conducive humidity [13, 14]. Previous studies in Sri Lanka, Tanzania and Gambia, revealed poor housing similar to thatched structures to be associated with increased entry and resting of mosquitoes with high malaria incidences [13]. In addition, thatched structures mainly belong to households with low socio-economic status and these households tend to use fewer repellents against nuisance mosquitoes. Use of repellents has been associated with less malaria in a clinic study carried out in Chennai [15]. Abundance of vectors in cattle sheds confirms the previous finding of An. stephensi that, it prefers animal sheds for feeding besides, resting in Chennai [16-18]. It was observed that 96.77% of the cattle sheds were with shared walls (<5 metres distance) from the nearest human dwelling. The proximity of the cattle sheds to human dwellings indicates, even though the human host was so close, the mosquitoes perhaps were lured to cattle/animals for their blood meal as there was no repellent or any mosquito prevention method and therefore, the animals were easily bitten by vector mosquitoes. This was reflected in the blood meal analysis, which showed the vector mosquitoes preferring animal blood. The results of the blood meal analysis indicated the selective preference of vectors on animal blood as the mosquitoes preferred the cattle population, even though human hosts were abundant when compared to the former [19]. However, studies carried out in Iran reported endophagic and endophilic behaviour of An. stephensi [20]. Further, the human blood meal samples collected from cattle sheds, support the previous reports that, after feeding on human blood, An. stephensi used animal sheds for resting which would help in completing its gonotrophic cycle [17]. Four of the five infected mosquitoes were collected from cattle sheds/outdoors. In the present study, it is assumed that An. stephensi selected cattle sheds as foraging and as an ideal resting habitat. The density of resting adults was low, which is the same elsewhere in many urban cities/towns in India [4, 21, 22]. The sporozoite positivity rate observed was very low despite perennial transmission of malaria over a period of time. This might be due to the incomplete knowledge of resting preferences [23, 24], which means the current study probably underestimates the density of infectious mosquitoes. However, the relatively low infectivity rate in the mosquitoes could also be due to the fact that this area has a moderate to low transmission rate, or the infected mosquitoes undergo enhanced mortality [25-28]. The parity analysis supported the fact that, survival of the adult mosquitoes in the study area was limited. This was in line with studies carried out elsewhere that only 10% of the adult population survives to the epidemiologically relevant age  [29, 30]. In Solomon Islands, P. falciparum was detected from 15.2% of 1-parous Anopheles farauti mosquitoes, using PCR detection method [31]. Another study in Benin showed that, the infected females were at least of biparous stage of physiological age [32]. The results of ELISA (Table 2) showed that, P. falciparum infection was observed in mosquitoes collected during February, and P. vivax infection in mosquitoes collected during October, November and December. Being a malignant parasite, presence of P. falciparum in mosquitoes during relatively low transmission season (Fig. 2) underlines the importance of having intense active surveillance irrespective of seasons. However, with such low sample sizes it is difficult to draw any conclusions regarding seasonality or potential links to microclimate data [23]. Anopheles subpictus infected with malaria parasite is yet another interesting finding as this is the first report of vector incrimination of An. subpictus from Chennai. In India, sporozoite positive specimens were collected from a coastal village in the state of Tamil Nadu [33]. Anopheles subpictus was previously believed to be a benign species because of its zoophilic nature, though it was reported to be a vector in Sri Lanka and a secondary vector in Indonesia [34-39] and elsewhere, in Madhya Pradesh [40], Odisha [41] and urban area of Goa [42]. P. falciparum infection in An. subpictus indicates that it is a competent vector when favourable condition arises. Considering urban malaria, this finding is important as this can pose a real problem in future along with the primary/major vector, An. stephensi in Chennai.

Limitations

The present study was centered on human dwellings and cattle sheds and the latter was found to be preferred resting place of the local vector. As the current understanding of the other resting preferences are obscure as far as the local vector is concerned, there are chances that the present estimates of vector density and sporozoite rate may underestimate the true picture in Chennai.

Conclusion

The study revealed that adult vectors feed predominantly on cattle and also rest in cattle sheds. The UMS of the national programme focuses on larval source management, by carrying out anti-larval operations in breeding habitats of the urban malaria vectors. This strategy has additional benefits of contributing to Dengue and Chikungunya control as some of these habitats, like cisterns, are co-inhabited by An. stephensi and Aedes aegypti [4]. In rural areas, adult vector surveillance and control with indoor residual spray (IRS) or long lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) often focus on indoor domestic dwellings. The present study indicated that human dwellings (other than thatched structures) are not the preferred resting sites of the urban malaria vector. Rather, mosquitoes appear to be most readily found resting in cattle sheds and feeding on cattle. A recent theoretical study identified that in areas where residual malaria transmission is sustained by zoophilic vectors, even modest amounts of control that explicitly target these vectors may dramatically reduce transmission [43]. Therefore, targeting these resting sites with appropriate, cost effective intervention tools that are socio-behaviourally acceptable, coupled with effective larval source management to reduce vector breeding, could create opportunities for improved integrated vector management strategies that will help drive down malaria transmission and assist in India’s plan to eliminate malaria by 2030.
  27 in total

1.  Why is the effect of malaria parasites on mosquito survival still unresolved?

Authors:  Heather M Ferguson; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Blood meal identification by using Microdot ELISA in vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  B R Thapar; S N Sharma; R K Dasgupta; S M Kaul; A Bali; K Chhabra; S Lal
Journal:  J Commun Dis       Date:  1998-12

Review 3.  Mosquito immunity against Plasmodium.

Authors:  K Michel; F C Kafatos
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.714

4.  Anopheles subpictus B and its role in transmission of malaria in Odisha, India.

Authors:  S Kumari; S Das; N Mahapatra
Journal:  Trop Biomed       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.623

5.  Resting behaviour of Anopheles gambiae s.l. and its implication on malaria transmission in Uyui District, western Tanzania.

Authors:  Calvin Sindato; Bilali Kabula; Togolai J N K Mbilu; Chacha Manga; Patrick Tungu; John P Kazimoto; Stafford N Kibonai; William N Kisinza; Stephen M Magesa
Journal:  Tanzan J Health Res       Date:  2011-10

6.  Pathology of malaria-infected mosquitoes.

Authors:  W A Maier; H Becker-Feldman; H M Seitz
Journal:  Parasitol Today       Date:  1987-07

7.  Anopheles subpictus carry human malaria parasites in an urban area of Western India and may facilitate perennial malaria transmission.

Authors:  Ashwani Kumar; Rajeshwari Hosmani; Shivaji Jadhav; Trelita de Sousa; Ajeet Mohanty; Milind Naik; Adarsh Shettigar; Satyajit Kale; Neena Valecha; Laura Chery; Pradipsinh K Rathod
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Characterizing microclimate in urban malaria transmission settings: a case study from Chennai, India.

Authors:  Lauren J Cator; Shalu Thomas; Krijn P Paaijmans; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; Johnson A Justin; Manu T Mathai; Andrew F Read; Matthew B Thomas; Alex Eapen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  House design modifications reduce indoor resting malaria vector densities in rice irrigation scheme area in western Kenya.

Authors:  Harrysone Atieli; Diana Menya; Andrew Githeko; Thomas Scott
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  The effect of temperature on Anopheles mosquito population dynamics and the potential for malaria transmission.

Authors:  Lindsay M Beck-Johnson; William A Nelson; Krijn P Paaijmans; Andrew F Read; Matthew B Thomas; Ottar N Bjørnstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Priorities for Broadening the Malaria Vector Control Tool Kit.

Authors:  Priscille Barreaux; Antoine M G Barreaux; Eleanore D Sternberg; Eunho Suh; Jessica L Waite; Shelley A Whitehead; Matthew B Thomas
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2017-06-28

2.  Does the roof type of a house influence the presence of adult Anopheles stephensi, urban malaria vector? - evidence from a few slum settings in Chennai, India.

Authors:  Sangamithra Ravishankaran; Aswin Asokan; N A Johnson Amala Justin; Shalu Thomas; Vasna Joshua; Manu Thomas Mathai; Alex Eapen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Dynamics of Plasmodium vivax sporogony in wild Anopheles stephensi in a malaria-endemic region of Western India.

Authors:  Praveen Balabaskaran Nina; Ajeet Kumar Mohanty; Shuvankar Ballav; Smita Vernekar; Sushma Bhinge; Maria D'souza; Jayashree Walke; Suresh Kumar Manoharan; Anjali Mascarenhas; Edwin Gomes; Laura Chery; Neena Valecha; Ashwani Kumar; Pradipsinh K Rathod
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  An update on the distribution, bionomics, and insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia, 2018-2020.

Authors:  Meshesha Balkew; Peter Mumba; Gedeon Yohannes; Ephrem Abiy; Dejene Getachew; Solomon Yared; Amha Worku; Araya Gebresilassie; Fitsum G Tadesse; Endalamaw Gadisa; Endashaw Esayas; Temesgen Ashine; Delenasaw Yewhalaw; Sheleme Chibsa; Hiwot Teka; Matt Murphy; Melissa Yoshimizu; Dereje Dengela; Sarah Zohdy; Seth Irish
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  The neglected role of relative humidity in the interannual variability of urban malaria in Indian cities.

Authors:  M Santos-Vega; P P Martinez; K G Vaishnav; V Kohli; V Desai; M J Bouma; M Pascual
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Genetic diversity of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia provides insight into patterns of spread.

Authors:  Tamar E Carter; Solomon Yared; Dejene Getachew; Joseph Spear; Sae Hee Choi; Jeanne N Samake; Peter Mumba; Dereje Dengela; Gedeon Yohannes; Sheleme Chibsa; Matthew Murphy; Gunawardena Dissanayake; Cecilia Flately; Karen Lopez; Daniel Janies; Sarah Zohdy; Seth R Irish; Meshesha Balkew
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Wild populations of malaria vectors can mate both inside and outside human dwellings.

Authors:  Ismail H Nambunga; Betwel J Msugupakulya; Emmanuel E Hape; Issa H Mshani; Najat F Kahamba; Gustav Mkandawile; Daniel M Mabula; Rukiyah M Njalambaha; Emmanuel W Kaindoa; Letus L Muyaga; Marie R G Hermy; Frederic Tripet; Heather M Ferguson; Halfan S Ngowo; Fredros O Okumu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Microclimate variables of the ambient environment deliver the actual estimates of the extrinsic incubation period of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum: a study from a malaria-endemic urban setting, Chennai in India.

Authors:  Shalu Thomas; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; N A Johnson Amala Justin; Aswin Asokan; T Maria Jusler Kalsingh; Manu Thomas Mathai; Neena Valecha; Jacqui Montgomery; Matthew B Thomas; Alex Eapen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 9.  Biology and bionomics of malaria vectors in India: existing information and what more needs to be known for strategizing elimination of malaria.

Authors:  Sarala K Subbarao; Nutan Nanda; Manju Rahi; Kamaraju Raghavendra
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Geographical distribution of Anopheles stephensi in eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Meshesha Balkew; Peter Mumba; Dereje Dengela; Gedeon Yohannes; Dejene Getachew; Solomon Yared; Sheleme Chibsa; Matthew Murphy; Kristen George; Karen Lopez; Daniel Janies; Sae Hee Choi; Joseph Spear; Seth R Irish; Tamar E Carter
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.