| Literature DB >> 23452620 |
Lauren J Cator1, Shalu Thomas, Krijn P Paaijmans, Sangamithra Ravishankaran, Johnson A Justin, Manu T Mathai, Andrew F Read, Matthew B Thomas, Alex Eapen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental temperature is an important driver of malaria transmission dynamics. Both the parasite and vector are sensitive to mean ambient temperatures and daily temperature variation. To understand transmission ecology, therefore, it is important to determine the range of microclimatic temperatures experienced by malaria vectors in the field.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23452620 PMCID: PMC3599321 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Mean, minimum and maximum temperature, and mean DTR
| Asbestos Roof | 5 | 30.20 ± 0.02 | 25 | 36 | 4.39 ± 0.15 | ||
| | | Concrete Roof | 9 | 29.60 ± .02 | 24 | 37 | 2.15 ± 0.18 |
| | | Thatch Roof | 3 | 28.80 ± 0.08 | 24 | 36 | 5.78 ± 0.22 |
| | | Tile Roof | 8 | 29.92 ± 0.02 | 25 | 35 | 3.40 ± 0.03 |
| | Vegetation | 5 | 27.41 ± 0.03 | 21 | 35 | 6.21 ± 0.25 | |
| | | Well | 3 | 27.97 ± 0.03 | 22 | 36 | 3.27 ± 0.45 |
| | | Overhead Tank | 1 | 32.88 ± 0.15 | 26 | 45 | 14.88 ± 0.45 |
| | | Other Outdoor | 3 | 29.37 ± 0.04 | 22 | 36 | 6.10 ± 0.28 |
| | | NOAA | 1 | 26.26 ± 0.10 | 20 | 35 | 9.67 ± 0.36 |
| Asbestos Roof | 6 | 31.89 ± 0.02 | 28 | 39 | 3.99 ± 0.10 | ||
| | | Concrete Roof | 7 | 30.84 ± 0.01 | 27 | 36 | 1.37 ± 0.06 |
| | | Thatch Roof | 3 | 30.19 ± 0.04 | 26 | 38 | 5.13 ± 0.21 |
| | | Tile Roof | 8 | 31.50 ± 0.02 | 25 | 40 | 3.83 ± 0.13 |
| | Vegetation | 5 | 29.79 ± 0.02 | 25 | 38 | 6.03 ± 0.20 | |
| | | Well | 3 | 29.31 ± 0.03 | 25 | 40 | 3.64 ± 0.39 |
| | | Overhead Tank | 1 | 33.73 ± 0.10 | 27 | 43 | 12.03 ± 0.25 |
| | | Other Outdoor | 3 | 31.36 ± 0.04 | 25 | 37 | 7.18 ± 0.33 |
| | | NOAA | 1 | 28.94 ± 0.08 | 22 | 36 | 9.07 ± 0.30 |
| Asbestos Roof | 6 | 33.01 ± 0.03 | 29 | 39 | 4.41 ± 0.14 | ||
| | | Concrete Roof | 7 | 31.57 ± 0.01 | 30 | 35 | 0.94 ± 0.07 |
| | | Thatch Roof | 2 | 30.85 ± 0.05 | 27 | 36 | 3.97 ± 0.21 |
| | | Tile Roof | 8 | 32.36 ± 0.02 | 28 | 38 | 3.70 ± 0.16 |
| | Vegetation | 4 | 30.69 ± 0.04 | 19 | 35 | 5.19 ± 0.25 | |
| | | Well | 3 | 30.25 ± 0.03 | 27 | 37 | 4.00 ± 0.46 |
| | | Overhead Tank | 1 | 34.76 ± 0.15 | 29 | 43 | 11.38 ± 0.59 |
| | | Other Outdoor | 3 | 32.35 ± 0.05 | 27 | 40 | 6.38 ± 0.38 |
| NOAA | 1 | 30.22 ± 0.12 | 24 | 37 | 9.10 ± 0.35 |
The mean, minimum, maximum, and DTR for the different categories of data logger location subdivided by month.
Figure 1Relationship between temperature and the development rate of . The function as proposed by Brière et al.[30] is fitted to a set of empirical data (see Methods for references) and the well-established Detinova equation [37] over a defined temperature range (black line). The previously published thermal performance curve for P. falciparum is plotted in grey. The optimal temperature for P. falciparum development in this curve is 30.1°C and 29.4°C for P. vivax.
Figure 2Temperature reported by local weather station and within transmission sites. A. Average daily temperature over sampling period in all sites. Red lines indicate the month breaks in the data. B. Average hourly temperature profile for loggers located at transmission sites and the nearest NOAA weather station. Within transmission sites there was less cooling during the night and this resulted in higher average temperatures. Bars represent approximate 95% confidence intervals (±2 standard errors) of the mean calculated across the hourly temperature for loggers at each site.
Figure 3Average temperature and DTR for different structure types (divided in indoor and outdoor structures) over a 3 month time period. Bars represent standard errors; there are no error bars in cases in which measurements were from a single logger (NOAA and overhead tank).
Figure 4Predicted development times of and malaria (EIP in days) for different structure types (divided in indoor and outdoor structures) separated by predictions based on the mean temperature and daily variation in temperature, over approximately 3 months. Note the increase in differences between EIP predicted from loggers and NOAA reported data when fluctuation is incorporated into EIP calculations. Bars represent standard errors.
Figure 5Predicted development times of and malaria (EIP in days) within the local transmission setting. The black line indicates EIP durations as predicted using weather station data and the grey line represents the mean EIP from the ensemble of local habitat/structure types in which data loggers were placed. The grey shading indicates the potential range in EIP that exists within the transmission environment considering the diversity of microclimatic conditions extending from the coolest to warmest habitats.