Literature DB >> 28282209

Why does Steady-State Magnetic Reconnection have a Maximum Local Rate of Order 0.1?

Yi-Hsin Liu1, M Hesse1, F Guo2, W Daughton2, H Li2, P A Cassak3, M A Shay4.   

Abstract

Simulations suggest collisionless steady-state magnetic reconnection of Harris-type current sheets proceeds with a rate of order 0.1, independent of dissipation mechanism. We argue this long-standing puzzle is a result of constraints at the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) scale. We predict the reconnection rate as a function of the opening angle made by the upstream magnetic fields, finding a maximum reconnection rate close to 0.2. The predictions compare favorably to particle-in-cell simulations of relativistic electron-positron and nonrelativistic electron-proton reconnection. The fact that simulated reconnection rates are close to the predicted maximum suggests reconnection proceeds near the most efficient state allowed at the MHD scale. The rate near the maximum is relatively insensitive to the opening angle, potentially explaining why reconnection has a similar fast rate in differing models.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28282209     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.085101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  8 in total

1.  Orientation and Stability of Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection X Line.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Liu; M Hesse; T C Li; M Kuznetsova; A Le
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.811

2.  Strongly localized magnetic reconnection by the super-Alfvénic shear flow.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Liu; M Hesse; F Guo; H Li; T K M Nakamura
Journal:  Phys Plasmas       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.023

3.  Juno Observations of Heavy Ion Energization During Transient Dipolarizations in Jupiter Magnetotail.

Authors:  A V Artemyev; G Clark; B Mauk; M F Vogt; X-J Zhang
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.811

4.  Relativistic Nonthermal Particle Acceleration in Two-Dimensional Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection.

Authors:  Dmitri A Uzdensky
Journal:  J Plasma Phys       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  On the Collisionless Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Rate.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Liu; M Hesse; P A Cassak; M A Shay; S Wang; L-J Chen
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.720

6.  Magnetic Field Annihilation in a Magnetotail Electron Diffusion Region With Electron-Scale Magnetic Island.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; R E Denton; T K M Nakamura; K J Genestreti; T D Phan; R Nakamura; K-J Hwang; N Ahmadi; Q Q Shi; M Hesse; J L Burch; J M Webster; R B Torbert; B L Giles; D J Gershman; C T Russell; R J Strangeway; H Y Wei; P-A Lindqvist; Y V Khotyaintsev; R E Ergun; Y Saito
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.111

7.  Comparative Analysis of the Vlasiator Simulations and MMS Observations of Multiple X-Line Reconnection and Flux Transfer Events.

Authors:  M Akhavan-Tafti; M Palmroth; J A Slavin; M Battarbee; U Ganse; M Grandin; G Le; D J Gershman; J P Eastwood; J E Stawarz
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.811

8.  Decay of Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices at the Earth's Magnetopause Under Pure Southward IMF Conditions.

Authors:  T K M Nakamura; F Plaschke; H Hasegawa; Y-H Liu; K-J Hwang; K A Blasl; R Nakamura
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.720

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.