Literature DB >> 28282132

Quantifying Allosteric Communication via Both Concerted Structural Changes and Conformational Disorder with CARDS.

Sukrit Singh1, Gregory R Bowman1.   

Abstract

Allosteric (i.e., long-range) communication within proteins is crucial for many biological processes, such as the activation of signaling cascades in response to specific stimuli. However, the physical basis for this communication remains unclear. Existing computational methods for identifying allostery focus on the role of concerted structural changes, but recent experimental work demonstrates that disorder is also an important factor. Here, we introduce the Correlation of All Rotameric and Dynamical States (CARDS) framework for quantifying correlations between both the structure and disorder of different regions of a protein. To quantify disorder, we draw inspiration from methods for quantifying "dynamic heterogeneity" from chemical physics to classify segments of a dihedral's time evolution as being in either ordered or disordered regimes. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we apply CARDS to the Catabolite Activator Protein (CAP), a transcriptional activator that is regulated by Cyclic Adenosine MonoPhosphate (cAMP) binding. We find that CARDS captures allosteric communication between the two cAMP-Binding Domains (CBDs). Importantly, CARDS reveals that this coupling is dominated by disorder-mediated correlations, consistent with NMR experiments that establish allosteric coupling between the CBDs occurs without a concerted structural change. CARDS also recapitulates an enhanced role for disorder in the communication between the DNA-Binding Domains (DBDs) and CBDs in the S62F variant of CAP. Finally, we demonstrate that using CARDS to find communication hotspots identifies regions of CAP that are in allosteric communication without foreknowledge of their identities. Therefore, we expect CARDS to be of great utility for both understanding and predicting allostery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28282132      PMCID: PMC5934993          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  79 in total

1.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Enzyme flexibility and enzyme action.

Authors:  D E KOSHLAND
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1959-12

Review 3.  Expanding the Range of Protein Function at the Far End of the Order-Structure Continuum.

Authors:  Virginia M Burger; Diego O Nolasco; Collin M Stultz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

5.  Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics.

Authors:  Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Combining NMR and molecular dynamics studies for insights into the allostery of small GTPase-protein interactions.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Sabine Bouguet-Bonnet; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Structure-based drug screening for G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 8.  The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Daniel M Rosenbaum; Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Modelling proteins' hidden conformations to predict antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hart; Chris M W Ho; Supratik Dutta; Michael L Gross; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Quantifying information transfer by protein domains: analysis of the Fyn SH2 domain structure.

Authors:  Tom Lenaerts; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Francois Stricher; Luis Serrano; Joost W H Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-10-08
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  What Combined Measurements From Structures and Imaging Tell Us About DNA Damage Responses.

Authors:  Chris A Brosey; Zamal Ahmed; Susan P Lees-Miller; John A Tainer
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Enspara: Modeling molecular ensembles with scalable data structures and parallel computing.

Authors:  J R Porter; M I Zimmerman; G R Bowman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Advanced Methods for Accessing Protein Shape-Shifting Present New Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Catherine R Knoverek; Gaya K Amarasinghe; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Evolution of dynamical networks enhances catalysis in a designer enzyme.

Authors:  H Adrian Bunzel; J L Ross Anderson; Donald Hilvert; Vickery L Arcus; Marc W van der Kamp; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 5.  New perspectives in cancer drug development: computational advances with an eye to design.

Authors:  Matteo Castelli; Stefano A Serapian; Filippo Marchetti; Alice Triveri; Valentina Pirota; Luca Torielli; Simona Collina; Filippo Doria; Mauro Freccero; Giorgio Colombo
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 6.  Intrinsic dynamics is evolutionarily optimized to enable allosteric behavior.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Pemra Doruker; Burak Kaynak; She Zhang; James Krieger; Hongchun Li; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Viral packaging ATPases utilize a glutamate switch to couple ATPase activity and DNA translocation.

Authors:  Joshua Pajak; Rockney Atz; Brendan J Hilbert; Marc C Morais; Brian A Kelch; Paul J Jardine; Gaurav Arya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conformational distributions of isolated myosin motor domains encode their mechanochemical properties.

Authors:  Justin R Porter; Artur Meller; Maxwell I Zimmerman; Michael J Greenberg; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  "Infostery" analysis of short molecular dynamics simulations identifies highly sensitive residues and predicts deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Yasaman Karami; Tristan Bitard-Feildel; Elodie Laine; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Simulation of spontaneous G protein activation reveals a new intermediate driving GDP unbinding.

Authors:  Xianqiang Sun; Sukrit Singh; Kendall J Blumer; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.