Literature DB >> 28281155

The Strength of Ethical Matrixes as a Tool for Normative Analysis Related to Technological Choices: The Case of Geological Disposal for Radioactive Waste.

Céline Kermisch1, Christophe Depaus2.   

Abstract

The ethical matrix is a participatory tool designed to structure ethical reflection about the design, the introduction, the development or the use of technologies. Its collective implementation, in the context of participatory decision-making, has shown its potential usefulness. On the contrary, its implementation by a single researcher has not been thoroughly analyzed. The aim of this paper is precisely to assess the strength of ethical matrixes implemented by a single researcher as a tool for conceptual normative analysis related to technological choices. Therefore, the ethical matrix framework is applied to the management of high-level radioactive waste, more specifically to retrievable and non-retrievable geological disposal. The results of this analysis show that the usefulness of ethical matrixes is twofold and that they provide a valuable input for further decision-making. Indeed, by using ethical matrixes, implicit ethically relevant issues were revealed-namely issues of equity associated with health impacts and differences between close and remote future generations regarding ethical impacts. Moreover, the ethical matrix framework was helpful in synthesizing and comparing systematically the ethical impacts of the technologies under scrutiny, and hence in highlighting the potential ethical conflicts.

Keywords:  Ethical matrix; Future generations; Geological disposal; Normative analysis; Radioactive waste; Retrievability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281155     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9882-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  Duties to future generations, proxy consent, intra- and intergenerational equity: the case of nuclear waste.

Authors:  K Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Trading jobs for health: ionizing radiation, occupational ethics, and the welfare argument.

Authors:  Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  An ethical dimension to sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated areas.

Authors:  Deborah Oughton; Ellen-Marie Forsberg; Ingrid Bay; Matthias Kaiser; Brenda Howard
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Intergenerational considerations affecting the future of nuclear power: equity as a framework for assessing fuel cycles.

Authors:  Behnam Taebi; Andrew C Kadak
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Specifying the Concept of Future Generations for Addressing Issues Related to High-Level Radioactive Waste.

Authors:  Celine Kermisch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Climate change, nuclear economics, and conflicts of interest.

Authors:  Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Framing ethical acceptability: a problem with nuclear waste in Canada.

Authors:  Ethan T Wilding
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review.

Authors:  Charisios Achillas; Nicolas Moussiopoulos; Avraam Karagiannidis; Georgias Banias; George Perkoulidis
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2013-01-11

9.  ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.

Authors:  W Weiss; C-M Larsson; C McKenney; J-P Minon; S Mobbs; T Schneider; H Umeki; W Hilden; C Pescatore; M Vesterlind
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2013-06

10.  Reexamining the Ethics of Nuclear Technology.

Authors:  Andrei Andrianov; Victor Kanke; Ilya Kuptsov; Viktor Murogov
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  2 in total

1.  Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Mélinée Schindler; Susan D Goold; Marion Danis
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  AWOSE - A Process Model for Incorporating Ethical Analyses in Agile Systems Engineering.

Authors:  Benjamin Strenge; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.