Literature DB >> 26695505

Specifying the Concept of Future Generations for Addressing Issues Related to High-Level Radioactive Waste.

Celine Kermisch1.   

Abstract

The nuclear community frequently refers to the concept of "future generations" when discussing the management of high-level radioactive waste. However, this notion is generally not defined. In this context, we have to assume a wide definition of the concept of future generations, conceived as people who will live after the contemporary people are dead. This definition embraces thus each generation following ours, without any restriction in time. The aim of this paper is to show that, in the debate about nuclear waste, this broad notion should be further specified and to clarify the related implications for nuclear waste management policies. Therefore, we provide an ethical analysis of different management strategies for high-level waste in the light of two principles, protection of future generations-based on safety and security-and respect for their choice. This analysis shows that high-level waste management options have different ethical impacts across future generations, depending on whether the memory of the waste and its location is lost, or not. We suggest taking this distinction into account by introducing the notions of "close future generations" and "remote future generations", which has important implications on nuclear waste management policies insofar as it stresses that a retrievable disposal has fewer benefits than usually assumed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Future generations; Geological disposal; Nuclear power; Radioactive waste; Safety; Security

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26695505     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9741-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  5 in total

1.  Intergenerational considerations affecting the future of nuclear power: equity as a framework for assessing fuel cycles.

Authors:  Behnam Taebi; Andrew C Kadak
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Ethics and radiation protection.

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 1.394

3.  ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.

Authors:  W Weiss; C-M Larsson; C McKenney; J-P Minon; S Mobbs; T Schneider; H Umeki; W Hilden; C Pescatore; M Vesterlind
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2013-06

4.  Reexamining the Ethics of Nuclear Technology.

Authors:  Andrei Andrianov; Victor Kanke; Ilya Kuptsov; Viktor Murogov
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  To recycle or not to recycle? An intergenerational approach to nuclear fuel cycles.

Authors:  Behnam Taebi; Jan Leen Kloosterman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.525

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Strength of Ethical Matrixes as a Tool for Normative Analysis Related to Technological Choices: The Case of Geological Disposal for Radioactive Waste.

Authors:  Céline Kermisch; Christophe Depaus
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Rawls's Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn; Behnam Taebi
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2017-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.