Literature DB >> 11266054

Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales.

S Petrou1, E Kupek, S Vause, M Maresh.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the independent effects of clinical factors and non-clinical factors, such as provider and sociodemographic characteristics, on the number of antenatal visits made by women in England and Wales. The study was based on a survey of the secondary case records of 20,771 women with singleton pregnancies who were delivered between 1 August 1994 and 31 July 1995. The women in the survey attended one of nine maternity units in Northern England and North Wales selected within those areas to reflect geographical variations, as well as variations in the size and teaching status of the institution. A multivariate Poisson regression model was developed to examine differences in the number of antenatal visits made by women with different clinical and non-clinical characteristics. After controlling for non-clinical factors, primiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 1.0% more visits than primiparous women identified as low risk at booking (p = 0.196). Multiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 3.5% more visits than their low risk counterparts (p<0.001). High risk-defining criteria during antenatal care led to a 0.3% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst primiparous women (p <0.001) and a 0.4% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst multiparous women (p < 0.001). Several notable results, not reported elsewhere in the literature, were revealed by the regression analyses. After all independent variables were controlled for, women who were booked into urban teaching hospitals made 10% fewer antenatal visits than the women who were booked into the urban non-teaching hospitals. Women of Pakistani origin made 9.1% fewer antenatal visits than women of white British origin. Similar results were revealed for women of Indian origin and women from other ethnic groups. Non-smokers made 6.0% more antenatal visits than smokers. The planned pattern of antenatal care, number of carers seen, gestation at first presentation and maternal age also had significant independent impacts on the number of antenatal visits. The study highlights the sizeable impact of non-clinical factors on the antenatal care delivery process and indicates ways in which variations in antenatal care might be reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266054     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Annette Bernloehr
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Angie Docherty; Carol Bugge; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Determinants of time of start of prenatal care and number of prenatal care visits during pregnancy among Nepalese women.

Authors:  Subas Neupane; David Teye Doku
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-08

4.  Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The development and application of a new tool to assess the adequacy of the content and timing of antenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Godelieve Masuy-Stroobant; Soo Downe; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Late entry to antenatal care in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Lieu Thuy Thi Trinh; George Rubin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Explanatory factors for first and second-generation non-western women's inadequate prenatal care utilisation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Agatha W Boerleider; Judith Manniën; Cherelle M V van Stenus; Therese A Wiegers; Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Evelien R Spelten; Walter L J M Devillé
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Factors Associated with Numbers of Antenatal Care Visits in Rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Melkalem Mamuye Azanaw; Alemayehu Digssie Gebremariam; Fentaw Teshome Dagnaw; Hiwot Yisak; Getaneh Atikilt; Binyam Minuye; Melaku Tadege Engidaw; Desalegn Tesfa; Edgeit Abebe Zewde; Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 9.  Factors affecting the use of prenatal care by non-western women in industrialized western countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Agatha W Boerleider; Therese A Wiegers; Judith Manniën; Anneke L Francke; Walter L J M Devillé
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ryan Ng; Erin M Macdonald; Mona R Loutfy; Mark H Yudin; Janet Raboud; Khatundi-Irene Masinde; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Wangari E Tharao; Jason Brophy; Richard H Glazier; Tony Antoniou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.