| Literature DB >> 28280341 |
Kuo-Wei Cheng1, Shan-Hui Hsu1.
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOEntities:
Keywords: drug release; hybrid nanoparticles; polyurethane; superparamagnetic iron oxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28280341 PMCID: PMC5340243 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S120290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Preparation of SPIO and drug-PU NPs.
Notes: (A) Synthesis and chemical structure of PU1, PU2, and PU3. (B) Encapsulation of SPIO NPs or drug in PU NPs by ultrasonic vibration.
Abbreviations: DMPA, 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid; EDA, ethylenediamine; IPDI, isophorone diisocyanate; NPs, nanoparticles; PCL, poly(ε-caprolactone); PEBA, polyethylene butylene adipate; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; TEA, triethylamine.
Sizes and zeta potentials of different NPs determined by light scattering analyses
| NPs | Ultrasonic vibration time | Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) | Zeta potential |
|---|---|---|---|
| PU1 | NA | 39.03±1.12 | −55.3±2.4 |
| PU2 | NA | 33.78±1.27 | −53±1.78 |
| PU3 | NA | 41.2±4.45 | −57.6±1.9 |
| SPIO-PU1 | 3 min | 140.4±8.45 | −29.04±0.25 |
| SPIO-PU2 | 3 min | 117.9±0.7 | −32.33±0.02 |
| SPIO-PU3 | 3 min | 111.5±3.61 | −34.46±1.35 |
| SPIO-PU1 | 20 sec | 119.33±17.17 | −29.88±1.51 |
| SPIO-PU2 | 20 sec | 135.31±10.39 | −32.42±0.6 |
| SPIO-PU3 | 20 sec | 66.13±0.61 | −40.23±3.97 |
| VK3-PU3 | 2.5 min | 37.02±2.28 | −41.41±0.7 |
| MAMA-PU3 | 2.5 min | 36.68±3.26 | −42.35±0.5 |
| MAMA-SPIO-PU3 | 2.5 min | 121.5±5.31 | −32.53±1.27 |
Notes: Figures for hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential are represented by mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: MAMA, 9-(methylaminomethyl)anthracene; NA, not applicable; NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; VK3, Vitamin K3.
Figure 2TEM analysis of various SPIO-PU NPs with different sonication time.
Abbreviations: NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.
Figure 3Characterization of SPIO-PU NPs.
Notes: (A) ATR-IR absorption spectra of PU1, PU2, PU3, SPIO-PU1, SPIO-PU2, and SPIO-PU3. (B) TGA curves of various SPIO-NPs.
Abbreviations: ATR-IR, attenuated total reflection-infrared spectroscopy; NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; TGA, thermogravimetric analyzer.
The extent of N–H stretching peak shift of SPIO-PU NPs
| Peak assignment | Peak shift PU1→SPIO-PU1 | Peak shift PU2→SPIO-PU2 | Peak shift PU3→SPIO-PU3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| N–H stretching | 3,373 cm−1→3,347 cm−1 | 3,365 cm−1→3,334 cm−1 | 3,367 cm−1→3,296 cm−1 |
| N–H bending | 1,556 cm−1→1,546 cm−1 | 1,553 cm−1→1,549 cm−1 | 1,558 cm−1→1,534 cm−1 |
Abbreviations: NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Figure 4Magnetic properties of SPIO-PU NPs.
Notes: (A) Superconducting quantum interference device magnetometer curves for various SPIO-PU NPs and (B) MRI T2-weighted images of SPIO-PU NPs at different iron concentrations (0–15 ppm).
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Figure 5Cell viability after hyperthermia treatment.
Notes: (A) Temperature elevation for SPIO-PU3 NPs compared to the SPIO NPs under high-frequency magnetic field. (B) The viability of A549 cells after hyperthermia treatment. *P<0.05 with respect to the control (without any treatment). (C) The morphology of A549 cells treated with SPIO-PU3 NPs and magnetic field in comparison to (D) the control (without any treatment).
Abbreviations: NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide.
The values of DEE and DLC for various drug-PU NPs
| Samples | DEE% | DLC (%) |
|---|---|---|
| VK3-PU1 | 96.36±0.30 | 0.32 |
| VK3-PU2 | 96.21±0.19 | 0.32 |
| VK3-PU3 | 95.51±0.25 | 0.32 |
| MAMA-PU3 | 97.45±0.36 | 0.32 |
| MAMA-SPIO-PU3 | 92.52±1.05 | 4.4 |
Abbreviations: DEE, drug entrapment efficiency; DLC, drug loading content; MAMA, 9-(methylaminomethyl)anthracene; PU, polyurethane; NPs, nanoparticles; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; VK3, Vitamin K3.
Figure 6Drug release profile of drug-PU NPs at different temperatures.
Notes: (A) The drug release profile of various VK3-PU NPs at 37°C. (B) The drug release profile of VK3-PU NPs at 50°C. (C) The drug release profile of MAMA-SPIO-PU3 NPs.
Abbreviations: DDW, distilled de-ionized water; MAMA, 9-(methylaminomethyl)anthracene; NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; VK3, Vitamin K3.
The water swelling ratios of different PU films
| WBPU film in 37°C DDW | PU1 | PU2 | PU3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swelling ratio (%) | 9.78±0.15 | 12.79±0.37 | 14.65±0.3 |
Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: DDW, distilled de-ionized water; WBPU, waterborne biodegradable polyurethane; PU, polyurethane.
Figure 7Cellular uptake of MAMA-SPIO-PU3 NPs.
Notes: (A) Evaluation of cytotoxicity of MAMA-SPIO-PU3 to A549 and L929 cells. *P<0.05 with respect to 0 ppm Fe. (B) The uptake of MAMA-SPIO-PU3 by A549 cells. Images of Prussian blue staining confirmed the internalization of SPIO NPs. Scale bar =20 µm. (C) Study of uptake of MAMA-SPIO-PU3 by L929 cells. Images of Prussian blue staining confirmed the internalization of SPIO NPs. Scale bar =20 µm.
Abbreviations: MAMA, 9-(methylaminomethyl)anthracene; NPs, nanoparticles; PU, polyurethane; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide.
Figure 8The hypothetical mechanism behind the encapsulation of SPIO and drug in PU NPs by the ultrasonic vibration method.
Abbreviations: PU NPs, polyurethane nanoparticles; SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide; Tg, glass transition temperature.