Literature DB >> 22364729

Nanoparticle uptake and gene transfer efficiency for MSCs on chitosan and chitosan-hyaluronan substrates.

Shan-hui Hsu1, Tung-Tso Ho, Ting-Chen Tseng.   

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) are usually surface modified to increase endocytosis for applications in cellular imaging and gene delivery. The influence of cell culture substrates on endocytosis remains relatively unexplored. This study investigated the substrate-mediated effects on the uptake of NPs by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Two types of NPs were employed, negatively charged paramagnetic iron oxide (Fe(3)O(4)) NPs (~5 nm) and bare plasmid DNA pTRE-Tight-DsRED2 (3.3 kb, ~5 nm), each of which were poorly endocytosed by the adipose-derived MSCs grown on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS). When cells were cultured on chitosan or hyaluronan-modified chitosan (chitosan-HA) membranes, significant increases (>5-fold) in the intracellular uptake of Fe(3)O(4) NPs as well as transfectability of plasmid DNA were demonstrated. The enhancement in transgene expression was more pronounced than that using the transfection agent. The beneficial effects were not caused by elevated proliferation or a change in the differentiation state of interacting MSCs. On chitosan and chitosan-HA, cells moved fast and formed spheroids. The cytoskeletal arrangement associated with the up-regulated RhoA activity during spheroid formation may have accounted for the increased endocytosis. Using different inhibitors, the endocytosis pathways were further clarified. Both Fe(3)O(4) NPs and plasmid DNA were taken up primarily by clathrin-mediated endocytosis on chitosan (~50%). The caveolae-mediated endocytosis on chitosan-HA was more evident (~30-40%) than that on chitosan (<25%). For plasmid DNA but not Fe(3)O(4) NPs, macropinocytosis also occurred on both substrates. Chitosan and chitosan-HA as cell culture substrates may activate different endocytic pathways of MSCs to increase NP internalization or plasmid transfection. The substrate-mediated endocytosis described here may represent a new and potentially attractive approach to facilitate stem cell labeling or to improve gene delivery efficiency without altering cell viability and differentiation. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364729     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  18 in total

1.  Inorganic nanovectors for nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Sandhya Pranatharthiharan; Mitesh D Patel; Anisha A D'Souza; Padma V Devarajan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 2.  Biomaterial substrate modifications that influence cell-material interactions to prime cellular responses to nonviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Amy Mantz; Angela K Pannier
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-01-08

Review 3.  Personalized nanomedicine advancements for stem cell tracking.

Authors:  Miroslaw Janowski; Jeff W M Bulte; Piotr Walczak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Polymeric scaffolds for three-dimensional culture of nerve cells: a model of peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Radamés Ayala-Caminero; Luis Pinzón-Herrera; Carol A Rivera Martinez; Jorge Almodovar
Journal:  MRS Commun       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy.

Authors:  Geeta Mehta; Amy Y Hsiao; Marylou Ingram; Gary D Luker; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Vehiculization determines the endocytic internalization mechanism of Zn(II)-phthalocyanine.

Authors:  Jorge Soriano; Angeles Villanueva; Juan C Stockert; Magdalena Cañete
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  The effect of the acid-sensitivity of 4-(N)-stearoyl gemcitabine-loaded micelles on drug resistance caused by RRM1 overexpression.

Authors:  Saijie Zhu; Piyanuch Wonganan; Dharmika S P Lansakara-P; Hannah L O'Mary; Yue Li; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Physical and mechanical cues affecting biomaterial-mediated plasmid DNA delivery: insights into non-viral delivery systems.

Authors:  Valeria Graceffa
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-17

9.  Formulation, characterization, and expression of a recombinant MOMP Chlamydia trachomatis DNA vaccine encapsulated in chitosan nanoparticles.

Authors:  Chino D Cambridge; Shree R Singh; Alain B Waffo; Stacie J Fairley; Vida A Dennis
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-05-10

10.  Ultrasound treatment increases transfection efficiency of low molecular weight chitosan in fibroblasts but not in KB cells.

Authors:  Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat; Chanyapat Supaprutsakul; Wilaiwan Chotigeat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.